Advanced Search Results
Tannia Rikhy and Others vs Sunrider India Pvt. Ltd.
Delhi
May-21-2026
Land Acquisition
been brought under the ambit of Service Tax, with effect from 01.06.2007 by virtue of implementation of the Finance Act, 2007. The Defendants, requested the Plaintiff to expedite the payment of Service Tax with immediate effect, so as to … Page 13 of 15 Digitally Signed By:ANIL KUMAR BHATT Signing Date:21.05.2026 17:16:57 52. At this stage, it would also be pertinent to refer to Letter … 32/2023 Page 1 of 15 Digitally Signed By:ANIL KUMAR BHATT Signing Date:21.05.2026 17:16:57 1. Regular First Appeal under Section 96 read with Order XLI Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskG.V.Matheswaran Vs. the Union of India
Chennai
Jun-20-2014
Service Tax
the provisions of Section 65(90a) read with Section 65(105)(zzzz) of the Finance Act, 1994 as amended by the Finance Act, 2007 and Finance Act, 2010 (b) levying or attempting to levy, collect or recover from the petitioner, any service … judgment reported in [2012].52 VST409(Raj.).Purshottam Das Malpani versus Union of India and OtheRs.Accordingly, W.P.No.8932 of 2011 is dismissed. 52 In W.P.No.26012 of 2012, the Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board has made a challenge to the order dated
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/s. Bharti Airtel Ltd. Vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise
Mumbai
Aug-26-2014
Service Tax
Secondary and Higher Education Cess on excisable goods leviable under section 136 read with section 138 of the Finance Act, 2007 (22 of 2007);(vii)(vii) the additional duty leviable under section 3 of Customs Tariff Act, equivalent to the duty … CCE Vs. Jay Engineering Works Ltd., (1989(39) ELT 169 (S.C.) (g) Indus Towers Ltd. Vs. CTO, Hyderabad, ((2012) 52 VST 447), (VIII) That it is impossible to conceive that the telecommunication services can be provided without towers
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Vatika Farms Private Limited Through Its Director, Sh. Anil Bhalla and ...
Delhi
Mar-28-2008
Direct Taxation
(2008)216CTR(Del)37; 2008(102)DRJ356; [2008]98ITR302(Delhi)
are presently not concerned with that.4. The challenge has arisen out of amendments to the Act by the Finance Act, 2007. The effect of the amendments is that where a settlement application has been filed under Section 245C of … a very brief order passed by the Bombay High Court on 4th March, 2008 in Writ Petition No. 525/2008 ( Sunita Textiles Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax) wherein it has been directed that the Settlement Commission
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRaghubir Saran Charitable Trust Vs. Puma Sports India Pvt.Ltd.
Delhi
May-15-2013
Land Acquisition
handed over to the appellant.2) The dispute which arose inter se the parties was a sequitur to the Finance Act, 2007 which introduced an amendment in the Finance Act, 1994 incorporating in Section 65 (105), a sub-Clause (zzzz). The … SPORTS INDIA PVT.LTD. .... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Chinmoy Pradip Sharma and Mr.Sayan Ray, Advocates. _____________________________________________________________________________________________ FAO (OS) Nos.440/2012 and 52/2013 Page 1 of 23 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJAY KISHAN
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRaghubir Saran Charitable Trust Vs. Puma Sports India Pvt.Ltd
Delhi
May-15-2013
Land Acquisition
handed over to the appellant.2) The dispute which arose inter se the parties was a sequitur to the Finance Act, 2007 which introduced an amendment in the Finance Act, 1994 incorporating in Section 65 (105), a sub-Clause (zzzz). The … SPORTS INDIA PVT.LTD. .... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Chinmoy Pradip Sharma and Mr.Sayan Ray, Advocates. _____________________________________________________________________________________________ FAO (OS) Nos.440/2012 and 52/2013 Page 1 of 23 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJAY KISHAN
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskArjun Malhotra vs.commissioner of Income Tax
Delhi
Apr-20-2018
Direct Taxation
(1) with insertion of sub-section (2) with effect from 1st April, 1964. However, Section 52 was deleted/omitted by Finance Act, 1987 with effect from 1st April, 1988 in view of the judgment of the Supreme Court explaining both
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDirector of Income Tax, New Delhi vs.arjun Malhotra
Delhi
Apr-20-2018
Direct Taxation
(1) with insertion of sub-section (2) with effect from 1st April, 1964. However, Section 52 was deleted/omitted by Finance Act, 1987 with effect from 1st April, 1988 in view of the judgment of the Supreme Court explaining both
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEngineering Analysis Centre Of Excellence Private Limited Vs. The Comm ...
Supreme Court of India
Mar-02-2021
Direct Taxation
in the case of Arun Kumar (supra). To overcome the above decision, the law has been amended by Finance Act, 2007 with retrospective effect from 1/4/2002. The retrospective amendment merely takes away the above argument, which was available to … C.A. Nos. 8737-8941/2018, submitted that to comprehend the nature of a licence, one would have to refer to section 52 of the Indian Easements Act 1882. He stressed the fact that the ruling by the AAR in the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMumbai
Sep-15-2014
Service Tax
referred to. This Appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 r/w Section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994 challenges the order passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (for short âCESTATâ) dated … effect from such date as the Central Government may, by notification, appoint.â 52. We do not see as to how this Section can be of … Appeal No.57/2012 dated 23.04.2014, (8) The All India Federation of Tax Practitioners v/s Union of India reported in 2007(7) STR 625 (SC), (9) The Commissioner of Inland Revenue v/s Databank Systems Limited in Privy Council Appeal No.39/1989
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »