Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: finance act 2007 section 52 · Page 1 of about 1,556 results (0.078 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 21 2026

Tannia Rikhy and Others vs Sunrider India Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-21-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

been brought under the ambit of Service Tax, with effect from 01.06.2007 by virtue of implementation of the Finance Act, 2007. The Defendants, requested the Plaintiff to expedite the payment of Service Tax with immediate effect, so as to … Page 13 of 15 Digitally Signed By:ANIL KUMAR BHATT Signing Date:21.05.2026 17:16:57 52. At this stage, it would also be pertinent to refer to Letter … 32/2023 Page 1 of 15 Digitally Signed By:ANIL KUMAR BHATT Signing Date:21.05.2026 17:16:57 1. Regular First Appeal under Section 96 read with Order XLI Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 20 2014

G.V.Matheswaran Vs. the Union of India

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-20-2014

Subject : Service Tax

the provisions of Section 65(90a) read with Section 65(105)(zzzz) of the Finance Act, 1994 as amended by the Finance Act, 2007 and Finance Act, 2010 (b) levying or attempting to levy, collect or recover from the petitioner, any service … judgment reported in [2012].52 VST409(Raj.).Purshottam Das Malpani versus Union of India and OtheRs.Accordingly, W.P.No.8932 of 2011 is dismissed. 52 In W.P.No.26012 of 2012, the Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board has made a challenge to the order dated

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 26 2014

M/s. Bharti Airtel Ltd. Vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-26-2014

Subject : Service Tax

Secondary and Higher Education Cess on excisable goods leviable under section 136 read with section 138 of the Finance Act, 2007 (22 of 2007);(vii)(vii) the additional duty leviable under section 3 of Customs Tariff Act, equivalent to the duty … CCE Vs. Jay Engineering Works Ltd., (1989(39) ELT 169 (S.C.) (g) Indus Towers Ltd. Vs. CTO, Hyderabad, ((2012) 52 VST 447), (VIII) That it is impossible to conceive that the telecommunication services can be provided without towers

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 28 2008

Vatika Farms Private Limited Through Its Director, Sh. Anil Bhalla and ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-28-2008

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2008)216CTR(Del)37; 2008(102)DRJ356; [2008]98ITR302(Delhi)

are presently not concerned with that.4. The challenge has arisen out of amendments to the Act by the Finance Act, 2007. The effect of the amendments is that where a settlement application has been filed under Section 245C of … a very brief order passed by the Bombay High Court on 4th March, 2008 in Writ Petition No. 525/2008 ( Sunita Textiles Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax) wherein it has been directed that the Settlement Commission

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 15 2013

Raghubir Saran Charitable Trust Vs. Puma Sports India Pvt.Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-15-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

handed over to the appellant.2) The dispute which arose inter se the parties was a sequitur to the Finance Act, 2007 which introduced an amendment in the Finance Act, 1994 incorporating in Section 65 (105), a sub-Clause (zzzz). The … SPORTS INDIA PVT.LTD. .... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Chinmoy Pradip Sharma and Mr.Sayan Ray, Advocates. _____________________________________________________________________________________________ FAO (OS) Nos.440/2012 and 52/2013 Page 1 of 23 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJAY KISHAN

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 15 2013

Raghubir Saran Charitable Trust Vs. Puma Sports India Pvt.Ltd

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-15-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

handed over to the appellant.2) The dispute which arose inter se the parties was a sequitur to the Finance Act, 2007 which introduced an amendment in the Finance Act, 1994 incorporating in Section 65 (105), a sub-Clause (zzzz). The … SPORTS INDIA PVT.LTD. .... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Chinmoy Pradip Sharma and Mr.Sayan Ray, Advocates. _____________________________________________________________________________________________ FAO (OS) Nos.440/2012 and 52/2013 Page 1 of 23 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJAY KISHAN

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 20 2018

Arjun Malhotra vs.commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-20-2018

Subject : Direct Taxation

(1) with insertion of sub-section (2) with effect from 1st April, 1964. However, Section 52 was deleted/omitted by Finance Act, 1987 with effect from 1st April, 1988 in view of the judgment of the Supreme Court explaining both

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 20 2018

Director of Income Tax, New Delhi vs.arjun Malhotra

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-20-2018

Subject : Direct Taxation

(1) with insertion of sub-section (2) with effect from 1st April, 1964. However, Section 52 was deleted/omitted by Finance Act, 1987 with effect from 1st April, 1988 in view of the judgment of the Supreme Court explaining both

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 02 2021

Engineering Analysis Centre Of Excellence Private Limited Vs. The Comm ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-02-2021

Subject : Direct Taxation

in the case of Arun Kumar (supra). To overcome the above decision, the law has been amended by Finance Act, 2007 with retrospective effect from 1/4/2002. The retrospective amendment merely takes away the above argument, which was available to … C.A. Nos. 8737-8941/2018, submitted that to comprehend the nature of a licence, one would have to refer to section 52 of the Indian Easements Act 1882. He stressed the fact that the ruling by the AAR in the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 15 2014

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-15-2014

Subject : Service Tax

referred to. This Appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 r/w Section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994 challenges the order passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (for short “CESTAT”) dated … effect from such date as the Central Government may, by notification, appoint.” 52. We do not see as to how this Section can be of … Appeal No.57/2012 dated 23.04.2014, (8) The All India Federation of Tax Practitioners v/s Union of India reported in 2007(7) STR 625 (SC), (9) The Commissioner of Inland Revenue v/s Databank Systems Limited in Privy Council Appeal No.39/1989

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial