Advanced Search Results

P.C. JaIn Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 129(1) to 129(5), 129(6), 146A and 146A(2); Finance Act, 2007 - Sections 110; Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 30; Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 - Sections 9(4), 14 and 14(1); Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 2, 12, 35D, 35Q, 35Q(2) and 50; Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 65(5) and 83; Gold (Control) Act, 2003 - Sections 135; Customs and Excise Revenue Appellate Tribunal Act, 1986 - Sections 11; Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985 - Sections 11; Haryana Ceiling of Land Holdings Act, 1972 - Sections 20A; Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 - Sections 48(8); Maharastra Restoration of Lands to Schedule Tribes Act, 1974 - Sections 3(1), 4 and 9A; Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 19(6), 21,

Reported in : 159(2009)DLT326

1962 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Custom Act'). The said provision was introduced by Section 110 of the Finance Act, 2007 w.e.f. 11.05.2007.1.1 The petitioners being aggrieved, have laid a challenge to the said provision, broadly on two grounds. … Section 2(aa) of the Excise Act was inserted in the Excise Act by Act 44 of 1980 Section 50 and Schedule V w.e.f 11.10.1982. The said definition was amended to attain its present form by substitution of

Ms. the Windsor Castle, Kodimatha, Kottayam, Represented by M.O. Asram ...

Court : Kerala

Subject : Service Tax

and the scope of the statute was clarified by introducing a ‘proviso’ to Section 4(2) as per the Finance Act, 2007 w.e.f. 01.04.2007, making it clear that no luxury tax shall be payable for such charges received in respect … copy of the Act 41 of 2005 published in the Gazette dated 28.08.2005, it is contended that, since sub-section (5) of Section 6 was introduced only with effect from that date, there was no question of any’ escaped

Essar Steel Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Customs

Acts : Finance Act, 2007 - Sections 99 and 114; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 7, 12, 22, 25, 28(1), 30 and 76A to 76N; Sea Customs Act; Special Economic Zones Act, 2005 - Sections 1, 2, 2(1), 3, 3(1), 4, 4(1), 4(2), 4(4), 5, 7, 12, 15(9), 26, 26(1), 26(2), 30, 51, 53, 53(1), 53(2) and 55; Motor Vehicles Act - Sections 38 and 38(1); Taxation Act - Sections 3, 3(1) and 4A; Trade Marks Act - Sections 28; Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 3; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 4 and 4(1); Factories Act, 1948; Sea Customs (Amendment) Act, 1955; Land Customs Act; Indian Aircrafts Act, 1911; Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - Sections 2, 2(15), 2(18), 2(19), 2(20), 2(22), 2(23), 2(25), 2(26), 2(27), 12, 14, 14(1), 17, 18, 46 and 50; Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951; Income

Reported in : [2010]24STT121

permitted the goods into the zone. By virtue of Section 114(n) read with the 3rd Schedule to the Finance Act, 2007, Heading No. 11 of the Second Schedule - Export Tariff to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 was substituted … Section 4 provides for establishment of Special Economic Zone and approval and authorization to operate it to developer. Section 5 contains guidelines for notifying Special Economic Zone. Section 7 which assumes importance in the context of the present

Gvk Inds. Ltd and Anr Vs. The Income Tax officer and Anr

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service Tax

2010 with retrospective effect from 1.6.1976. Prior to the said substitution, another Explanation had been inserted by the Finance Act, 2007 with retrospective effect from 1.6.1976. The said Explanations read as under: "As amended by Finance Act, 2010 Explanation.- … in the equity of the appellant company besides IFC, Washington. The further stand of the revenue was that Section 5(2) read with Section 9(1)(i)(vii)(b) will apply to the remittance to be made by the company to the NRC

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Siemens Aktiongesellschaft

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 4, 4(2), 5, 9, 9(1), 9(2), 10(1), 10(2), 90, 90(1), 90(2) and 195; Finance Act, 2007; Indian Income Tax Act, 1922; Finance Act, 1976; Finance Act, 1977; Income Tax (Amendment) Act, 1976

Reported in : (2008)220CTR(Bom)425; [2009]310ITR320(Bom); [2009]177TAXMAN81(Bom)

of the Act to the extent they are required. Before answering the issue we may point out that Finance Act, 2007 has inserted Explanation to Section 9(1) after Section 9(1)(vii) with retrospective effect from 1st June, 1976 and which … principle of chargeability to tax under Section 4 and the general principle of ascertainment of total income under Section 5 of the Act, then there was no purpose in making those Sections 'subject to the provisions' of the

Enercon (India) Ltd. and Others Vs. Enercon Gmbh and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

buttress the said submission by referring to the clauses mentioned in the IPLA, regarding the grant of licences, finance, tenure of the IPLA; iv] That the patents in respect of which the licences were to be given … the Original Side of this Court being Short Cause Suit No.2667 of 2007 seeking resumption of supplies. This Court has, by an interim order dated … intervention by judicial authorities. 73. The absence in Part II of the Act of a provision corresponding to Section 5 in Part I has been highlighted as supportive of the view that greater judicial intervention is contemplated in

Surendra M. Khandhar Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 69, 132, 132A, 132A(1), 132B, 132(4), 132(4A), 132(5), 133, 133A, and 271(1); Finance Act, 2007 - Sections 292C

Reported in : (2009)224CTR(Bom)409

the case of Metrani (supra), the IT Act has been amended and Section 292C has been inserted by Finance Act, 2007 w.e.f. 1st Oct., 1975. The effect of said amendment is that where the document is seized in the … Chheda it is decided as under:(1) On or before 28th Feb., 1991, (Bhupen Chheda) myself will pay Rs. 5,00,000 (Rupees five lacs) towards the payment of loan out of twenty lakh rupees.(2) Balance amount will be paid

Tube Investments of India Limited Represented by Its Vice President, T ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(24), 5, 9(1), 10A, 10A(1A), 10B, 28 to 43C, 43D, 44AC, 64, 72, 80, 80(IA), 80(IE), 143C, 145, 153, 192, 193, 194, 194A, 194C, 194C(1), 194D, 194G, 194H, 194I, 194J, 194LA, 195, 195(5), 195A, 197, 198, 199, 200, 200(1), 201, 201(1), 201(1A), 205, 206C, 221, 271C, 276B and 276BB; Hindu Women's Right to Property Act; Companies Act; Finance Act, 1983; Finance Act, 2007; Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 - Sections 11D; Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 11(4); Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI), 2002 - Sections 13(4), 17 and 17(2); Andhra Pradesh Shops and Establishments Act, 1966 - Sections 47(3); Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972; Partnership Act, 1932 -

Reported in : (2009)226CTR(Mad)313; [2009]185TAXMAN438(Mad)

submission.87. The contention comparing Section 40(a)(ia) with the proviso to Section 40A(3)(b) of the Act as introduced through Finance Act, 2007, can have no relevance, in as much as in the first place, the two substantive provisions are not … and when the responsibility is fulfilled, it is reversed.39. According to the learned standing Counsel, by virtue of Section 5 of the Act, income would include deemed receipts and deemed accruals also. The learned standing Counsel therefore contended

Vatika Farms Private Limited Through Its Director, Sh. Anil Bhalla and ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2008)216CTR(Del)37; 2008(102)DRJ356; [2008]98ITR302(Delhi)

are presently not concerned with that.4. The challenge has arisen out of amendments to the Act by the Finance Act, 2007. The effect of the amendments is that where a settlement application has been filed under Section 245C of … a very brief order passed by the Bombay High Court on 4th March, 2008 in Writ Petition No. 525/2008 ( Sunita Textiles Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax) wherein it has been directed that the Settlement Commission

Commissioner of Income Tax Central Vs. Anil Hastkala (P) Ltd. and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2009)226CTR(Raj)417; [2010]186TAXMAN365(Raj)

tried to convince that once orders of settlement commission are not legally sustainable as per amendment made under Finance Act, 2007 being enforced w.e.f. 01/06/07, proceedings stand abated in terms of Section 245-HA as a consequence whereof, matter is … of assessees (quoted supra) but it is pertinent to extract relevant paras only to show that in para 5 of order impugned, settlement commission recorded at its own that it would be impracticable to examine the records