Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: finance act 2007 section 39 · Page 1 of about 2,140 results (0.058 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 07 2016

Simplex Infrastructures Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Service Tax, Kolkata

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-07-2016

Subject : Service Tax

service tax for the fiRs.time was introduced in India in the year 1994 under Chapter V of the Finance Act, 1994. It has been amended from time to time, inter alia, by introducing more categories of services within … the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of State of Punjab-vs.-Bhatinda District Co-op. Milk P Union LTD.reported in 2007 (11) SCC363 In that case, at paragraphs 18 and 19 of the judgment the Hon’ble Supreme Court observed … civil engineering construction and was not ‘consulting engineer’ within the meaning of Section 65(11) of the Finance Act, 1994. (as amended by Finance Act, 1997).(6)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 09 2012

Nagarjuna Constn. Co. Ltd. Vs. Government of India and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-09-2012

Subject : Tax

Acts : Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957; Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2005; Finance Act, 1994 - Section 65(105)(zzd), 39(a), 25(b), 30(a), 93, 94; Works Contracts (Composition Scheme for Payment of Service Tax) Rules, 2007 - Rule 3(3)

the following categories of taxable services, namely:(a) Erection, commissioning or installation service under Section 65(105) (zzd) of the Finance Act, 1994 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'),b) Commercial or industrial construction service under Section 65(105) (zzq) of the … of the Act, the Central Government introduced the Works Contracts (Composition Scheme for Payment of Service Tax) Rules, 2007 (hereinafter referred to as 'the 2007 Rules'). Under this scheme, an option of composition was offered @ 2% … complex (residential complex) service under Section 65(105) (zzzh) of the Act.4. Sub-sections 39(a), 25(b) and 30(a) of Section 65 of the Act define the above

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 26 2014

M/s. Bharti Airtel Ltd. Vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-26-2014

Subject : Service Tax

Secondary and Higher Education Cess on excisable goods leviable under section 136 read with section 138 of the Finance Act, 2007 (22 of 2007);(vii)(vii) the additional duty leviable under section 3 of Customs Tariff Act, equivalent to the duty … under Explanation IV to sub-section (28) of Section 2 of the APVAT Act,2005, is without jurisdiction and illegal. 39. In the facts and circumstances of this lis (adverted to supra), in view of the ratio deducible from

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jun 20 2014

G.V.Matheswaran Vs. the Union of India

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-20-2014

Subject : Service Tax

the provisions of Section 65(90a) read with Section 65(105)(zzzz) of the Finance Act, 1994 as amended by the Finance Act, 2007 and Finance Act, 2010 (b) levying or attempting to levy, collect or recover from the petitioner, any service … 23355 & 23356/2008, 24234/2008, 25280-25286/2008, 27820-27823/2008, 27917 & 27918/2008, 28021 & 28022/2008, 29188/2008, 662/2009, 747 & 748/2009, 2766-2770/2009, 3995/2009, 6346/2009, 8562/2009, 8613/2009, 8827-8846/2009, 9251/2009, 10494/2009, 10997/2009, 11024-11027/2009, 12016/2009, 12268 & 12269/2009, 16251/2009, 17238/2009, 18287/2009, 18795/2009, 19995-20013/2009, 20524/2009,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 30 2012

Prism Cement Limited, (Formerly Known as H and R Johnson (India) Limit ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-30-2012

Subject : Sales Tax

unregistered dealers. This error of the draftsman has been corrected by deleting the words 'or sub-section 2' by Finance Act 2007 which is purely clarificatory in nature. Accordingly, it is contended that since the object of 2002 amendment is … case of Shree Digvijay Cement Company Limited V/s. State of Rajasthan and others reported in (2000) 117 STC 395 (S.C.) over-ruling its decision in the case of the very same assessee reported in (1997) 106 STC 11

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 30 2012

Prism Cement Limited, (Formerly Known as H and R Johnson (India) Limit ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-30-2012

Subject : Sales Tax

unregistered dealers. This error of the draftsman has been corrected by deleting the words 'or sub-section 2' by Finance Act 2007 which is purely clarificatory in nature. Accordingly, it is contended that since the object of 2002 amendment is … case of Shree Digvijay Cement Company Limited V/s. State of Rajasthan and others reported in (2000) 117 STC 395 (S.C.) over-ruling its decision in the case of the very same assessee reported in (1997) 106 STC 11

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 22 2014

Commissioner Income Tax-i Vs. Chd Developers Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-22-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

2004 (23 of 2004), sec. 18(d), for sub-section (10) w.e.f. 1-4-2005). Earlier subsection (10) was amended by the Finance Act, 2000 (10 of 2001), sec. 39(e)(i) and (ii) (w.e.f. 1.4.2001), by Finance Act, 2003 (32 of 2003), Sec … issued, in the facts of this case, by the authority prescribed by Explanation (ii).3. The assessment year is 2007-08. The assessee, a real estate developer, launched a project known as “Krishna Lok” in Vrindavan. It obtained the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 23 2012

Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation Vs. C ...

Court : UK Supreme Court

Decided on : May-23-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

rely on section 320 of the Finance Act 2004 ("Section 320 FA 2004") or section 107 of the Finance Act 2007 ("Section 107 FA 2007") to exclude DMG mistake claims, as these provisions purported to curtail the extended limitation period … 661, para 19; Marks and Spencer plc v Customs and Excise Comrs (Case C-62/00) [2003] QB 866, para 39. 20. The crucial question, however, is whether the retrospective application of that limitation period to claims based on

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 15 2014

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-15-2014

Subject : Service Tax

referred to. This Appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 r/w Section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994 challenges the order passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (for short “CESTAT”) dated … Appeal No.57/2012 dated 23.04.2014, (8) The All India Federation of Tax Practitioners v/s Union of India reported in 2007(7) STR 625 (SC), (9) The Commissioner of Inland Revenue v/s Databank Systems Limited in Privy Council Appeal No.39/1989

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 15 2014

P.C. Joshi, Indian Citizen, A practicing Advocate and Others Vs. Union ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-15-2014

Subject : Service Tax

practicing advocate prays for the following reliefs:- “(a) Declare the impugned provisions in section 65(105) (zzzzm) of the Finance Act, 1994 as inserted by the Finance Act, 2011 as null and void and ultra vires the Constitution of … also submitted that the Hon'ble Supreme Court in All India Federation of Tax Practitioners V/s. Union of India 2007 (7) SCC 527 has held that Service Tax is a value added tax which is levied on the … of individuals seems to be to cater to the need of Article 39A of the Constitution of India; however the legislature seems to have lost

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial