Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: finance act 2007 section 38 · Page 1 of about 2,108 results (0.071 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 04 2009

Essar Steel Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Nov-04-2009

Subject : Customs

Acts : Finance Act, 2007 - Sections 99 and 114; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 7, 12, 22, 25, 28(1), 30 and 76A to 76N; Sea Customs Act; Special Economic Zones Act, 2005 - Sections 1, 2, 2(1), 3, 3(1), 4, 4(1), 4(2), 4(4), 5, 7, 12, 15(9), 26, 26(1), 26(2), 30, 51, 53, 53(1), 53(2) and 55; Motor Vehicles Act - Sections 38 and 38(1); Taxation Act - Sections 3, 3(1) and 4A; Trade Marks Act - Sections 28; Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 3; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 4 and 4(1); Factories Act, 1948; Sea Customs (Amendment) Act, 1955; Land Customs Act; Indian Aircrafts Act, 1911; Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - Sections 2, 2(15), 2(18), 2(19), 2(20), 2(22), 2(23), 2(25), 2(26), 2(27), 12, 14, 14(1), 17, 18, 46 and 50; Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951; Income

Reported in : [2010]24STT121

permitted the goods into the zone. By virtue of Section 114(n) read with the 3rd Schedule to the Finance Act, 2007, Heading No. 11 of the Second Schedule - Export Tariff to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 was substituted … v. K. Gopalakrishna Shenoy : [1987] 3 SCC 655, wherein it is held that the deeming provision in Section 38(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act cannot be extended to Section 3(1) and the Explanation thereto of the Taxation

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 26 2014

M/s. Bharti Airtel Ltd. Vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-26-2014

Subject : Service Tax

Secondary and Higher Education Cess on excisable goods leviable under section 136 read with section 138 of the Finance Act, 2007 (22 of 2007);(vii)(vii) the additional duty leviable under section 3 of Customs Tariff Act, equivalent to the duty … placed on the following judgments:- (a) Industrial Machinery Manufacturers Pvt. Ltd Vs. The State of Gujarat, (1965)16 STC 380); (b) Member, Board of Revenue, West Bengal Vs. M/s.Phelps and Co.(P) Ltd., (1972) 4 Supreme Court Cases 121;

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 23 2012

Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation Vs. C ...

Court : UK Supreme Court

Decided on : May-23-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

rely on section 320 of the Finance Act 2004 ("Section 320 FA 2004") or section 107 of the Finance Act 2007 ("Section 107 FA 2007") to exclude DMG mistake claims, as these provisions purported to curtail the extended limitation period … excluded by section 320 FA 2004 and section 107 FA 2007. 13. As Lord Walker explains in para 38, the question is whether EU law requires only that the member state must make available an adequate remedy

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 10 2010

In the Matter Of: Damodar Valley Corporation Vs. Central Electricity R ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Decided on : May-10-2010

Subject : Direct Taxation

for the Appellant relied upon the judgment of the Supreme Court in 2007 (3) SCC 33 DERC Vs BSES Yamuna Power Ltd. and Ors. The … the Central Commission dated 6.8.2009 on the following issues:- i) Additional capitalisation. ii) Interest on capital as per Section 38 of the DVC Act. iii) Other capital being adjusted against depreciation. iv) Pay revision. v) Pension and gratuity … or by way of interest on loans. We direct the Central Commission to ensure that capital deployed in financing operating assets is getting fully serviced either through Return on Equity or interest on loan (including on the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 31 2018

Commissioner of Income Tax 5 Mumbai Vs. M/S. Essar Teleholdings Ltd. T ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-31-2018

Subject : Land Acquisition

be understood before correctly appreciating the nature and purport of Rule 8D. Section 14A was first inserted by Finance Act, 2001 with retrospective effect w.e.f. 01.04.1962. Section 14A as originally inserted reads as under:­ “14A. Expenditure incurred in … and (3) of Section 14A clearly mention that the aforesaid provisions were to be applicable from assessment year 2007­2008 onwards. Hence, Rule 8D, which is framed to give effect to the provisions of sub­sections (2) and (3) … C.A. No. 113 of 20151, C.A. No. 7797 of 2012, C.A. No. 381 of 2013 , C.A. No. 7426 of 2012, C.A. No. 8195 of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 13 2009

Commissioner of Income Tax Central Vs. Anil Hastkala (P) Ltd. and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Aug-13-2009

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2009)226CTR(Raj)417; [2010]186TAXMAN365(Raj)

tried to convince that once orders of settlement commission are not legally sustainable as per amendment made under Finance Act, 2007 being enforced w.e.f. 01/06/07, proceedings stand abated in terms of Section 245-HA as a consequence whereof, matter is … once remained undecided for adjudication and remain pending in such cases, proceedings can be considered to be abated. 38. It is also not the case of respondents that settlement commission constituted Under Section 245-B(2) stands wound up,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 09 2010

M/S.Malaysian Airlines. M/S.Saudi Arabian Airlines. and ors Vs. the Un ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-09-2010

Subject : Service Tax

Acts : Constitution Of India - Article 226

under Article 226 of the Constitution of India are challenging imposition of penalty under section 38(3) of the Finance Act, 1979 ("Finance Act" or "Act" for short) for delay in payment of Foreign Travel Tax ("FTT" for short) … v. Union of India, 2006 (202) ELT 588 (Bom.) followed in North West Airlines v. Union of India, 2007 (214) ELT 278 (Bom); wherein Division Bench of this Court upheld the minimum penalty imposed upon the carrier/airlines

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 15 2014

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-15-2014

Subject : Service Tax

referred to. This Appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 r/w Section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994 challenges the order passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (for short “CESTAT”) dated … best international practice, the Export of the Service Rules, 2005 were notified. 38. The final submission of Mr.Sridharan is that the amendment/deletion made on 27.02.2010 … Appeal No.57/2012 dated 23.04.2014, (8) The All India Federation of Tax Practitioners v/s Union of India reported in 2007(7) STR 625 (SC), (9) The Commissioner of Inland Revenue v/s Databank Systems Limited in Privy Council Appeal No.39/1989

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 25 2018

Lally Automobiles Pvt. Ltd. Vs.commissioner (Adjudication), Central Ex ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-25-2018

Subject : Service Tax

for payment of Service Tax under the categories of "Authorized Service Station" and "Business Auxiliary Service" under the Finance Act, 1994. It availed Cenvat credit of duty paid on various inputs and tax paid on better services in … The rules clearly provides that the exempted services includes services on which no service tax is leviable under Section 66 of the Finance Act, 1944. Trading is a service liable to VAT/sales tax by States and outside

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 12 2013

M/S. Shiva Mines and Mineral Vs. State of Raj. and anr

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Decided on : Sep-12-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

the rules framed thereunder have been complete violated while framing assessment orders. Definition of 'land' as given in Section 38 (c) of the Rajasthan Finance Act, 2006 has also not been taken into consideration. The provisional assessment lists … challenged the levy of land tax vide the demand notices dated 05.06.2008 (Annex-5), under the provisions of Rajasthan Finance Act, 2006 for assessment years 2006-07 raised by the Assessing Authority, (Sub-Registrar), Kolayat.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial