Advanced Search Results

N.H. Harsora Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and 2 ors.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Excise

Acts : Finance Act, 2007 - Sections 32E, 32F, 32F(1), 32F(5) and 32F(6);

Reported in : 2009(164)LC202(Gujarat); 2009(243)ELT684(Guj); (2009)2GLR1696

as if no application under Section 32E had been made.9. This Section came to be substituted by the Finance Act, 2007 with effect from 1/6/2007. Prior to this point of time, there was no time limit fixed for making

Commissionerate Vs. Ankit Metal and Power Ltd. and Ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Education

sub-section (7) of section 32F [, as it stood immediately before the commencement of section 122 of the Finance Act, 2007 (22 of 2007) or sub-section (5) of section 32F,].provides for the imposition of a penalty on the person … (5) of section 32F,].provides for the imposition of a penalty on the person who made the application under section 32E for settlement, on the ground of concealment of particulars of his duty liability; ………. then, he shall not

Commissioner, Central Excise, Customs & Service Tax, Sonepat & ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

29. We may note, here, that Section 32F was substituted, in its entirety, by Section 122 of the Finance Act, 2007. As it stood prior to substitution, sub-section (1) of Section 32F read thus: the case or the complexity … moving the Customs, Central Excise and Service Tax Settlement Commission (hereinafter referred to as ―the Settlement Commission‖), under Section 32E of the Act. Vide Final Order dated 2nd September, 2014, the Settlement Commission settled the case, on condition

Union of India and ors. Vs. M/S. Ind-swift Laboratories Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 32E(1), 32F(7), 32M

the provisions of Sections 11A and 11AB of the Excise Act or Sections 73 and 75 of the Finance Act, shall apply mutatis mutandis for effecting such recoveries."2 16. A bare reading of the said Rule would indicate … judgment and order dated 03.07.2009 in Civil Writ Petition No. 13860 of 2007 passed by the Punjab & Haryana High Court, whereby the High Court … also deposited the entire duty of Rs. 5,71,47,148/-. Since conditions/parameters for the admission of a case prescribed under Section 32E(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 [for short "the Act"] were fulfilled and complied with, the application of

Commissionerate Vs. Rohit Ferro Tech Ltd. and Ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Education

sub-section (7) of section 32F [, as it stood immediately before the commencement of section 122 of the Finance Act, 2007 (22 of 2007) or sub-section (5) of section 32F,].provides for the imposition of a penalty on the person … an earlier point of time. This case arises out of an application made by the writ petitioner under Section 32E of the Central Excise Act, 1944 with regard to the fifth show-cause notice. It appears that the Settlement

Rohit Ferro Tech Ltd. and ors. Vs. Settlement Commission and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Right to Information

sub-section (7) of section 32F [, as it stood immediately before the commencement of section 122 of the Finance Act, 2007 (22 of 2007) or sub-section (5) of section 32F,].provides for the imposition of a penalty on the person … an earlier point of time. This case arises out of an application made by the writ petitioner under Section 32E of the Central Excise Act, 1944 with regard to the fifth show-cause notice. It appears that the Settlement

Ankit Metal and Power Ltd. and ors. Vs. Settlement Commission and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Right to Information

sub-section (7) of section 32F [, as it stood immediately before the commencement of section 122 of the Finance Act, 2007 (22 of 2007) or sub-section (5) of section 32F,].provides for the imposition of a penalty on the person … (5) of section 32F,].provides for the imposition of a penalty on the person who made the application under section 32E for settlement, on the ground of concealment of particulars of his duty liability; ……… then, he shall not

Alluminium Profiles Limited, a Public Limited Company Registered Under ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 2007 - Sections 11, 32(7), 32E, 32F, 32F(5), 32F(7), 32F(8), 32F(9), 32F(10), 32M and 32N; Income Tax Act; Finance Act, 1984

Reported in : 2009(169)LC76(Bombay); 2009(241)ELT9(Bom)

power to make payment by installments. In respect of similar provisions pertaining to the Income Tax Act, by Finance Act, 1984 w.e.f. 1.10.1984 the powers of the Settlement Commission to grant payment by installments has been recognized. That … The Settlement Commission thereafter passed an order on 31.10.2008.Section 32F has been substituted by Act No. 22 of 2007 with effect from 1.6.2007. Section 32F(10) as it originally stood read as under:Where any duty payable in pursuance … jurisdiction over the person who made the application for settlement under Section 32E.6. Considering the above, it is clear that as the order of settlement

M/S.Truwood Pvt. Ltd., Visakhapatnam. Vs. the Commissioner of Central ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

parties that the said provisions were amended by substitution with effect from 01-06-2007 by Section 121 of the Finance Act, 2007 and the amended provisions do not apply to the facts of the case. 22004) 1 S.C.C. 287 C.E.A.Nos.54 … Commissioner of Central Excise, Visakhapatnam which was passed after filing of an application before the Settlement Commission under Section 32E of the Central Excise Act and was declared as "Non Est" by the Settlement Commission is valid in

M/s. Cineyug Worldwide through its Partner Ali Morani Vs. The Union of ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Education

event management services. These services are covered by Section 65(40) read with Sections 65(41) and 65(105)(zu) of the Finance Act, 1994. The Petitioners are registered with the Service Tax Department under registration No. AAFFC3158GST001. 4. During the Financial … dated 29th May 2014. By that order, the Settlement Commission rejected the application in question as impermissible under Section 32E of the Central Excise Act, 1944 ( CEA ). 3. The Petitioners are a partnership firm. They provide … Service Tax Department under registration No. AAFFC3158GST001. 4. During the Financial Years 2007-2008 to 2010-2011, the Petitioners claim to have suffered a set back in