Advanced Search Results

Commissioner of Income Tax Central Vs. Anil Hastkala (P) Ltd. and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2009)226CTR(Raj)417; [2010]186TAXMAN365(Raj)

tried to convince that once orders of settlement commission are not legally sustainable as per amendment made under Finance Act, 2007 being enforced w.e.f. 01/06/07, proceedings stand abated in terms of Section 245-HA as a consequence whereof, matter is … this Court and got directions issued in pursuance whereof, settlement commission decided their applications by common order dt. 29/03/08, in which also, paras are almost self-same as in order dt. 31/03/08 impugned in bunch of petitions of

The Manager, Ravindra Kalakestra Vs. the Commissioner of Central

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2008)12STJ245CESTAT(Bang.)alore

function' includes 'marriage'. The learned Advocate has come to the conclusion that social function, as far as the Finance Act 2007 is concerned, means only marriage and similar functions. We are afraid that the above conclusion is not correct. … Order-in-Appeal No. 16/2004 dated 6.2.2004 confirming Service Tax under the category of Mantap Keepers as defined under the Section 65 of Finance Act. The appellant is a non-commercial auditorium, which is let-out on nominal charges for activities … Government of Karnataka, Mysore" by Final Order No. 720 and 721 dated 29.6.2007 wherein this bench has upheld the levy of Service Tax to the

G.V.Matheswaran Vs. the Union of India

Court : Chennai

Subject : Service Tax

the provisions of Section 65(90a) read with Section 65(105)(zzzz) of the Finance Act, 1994 as amended by the Finance Act, 2007 and Finance Act, 2010 (b) levying or attempting to levy, collect or recover from the petitioner, any service … T.S.SIVAGNANAM W.P.Nos.16400/2013, 23983/2009, 16789/2008, 16790/2008, 21564/2008, 23355 & 23356/2008, 24234/2008, 25280-25286/2008, 27820-27823/2008, 27917 & 27918/2008, 28021 & 28022/2008, 29188/2008, 662/2009, 747 & 748/2009, 2766-2770/2009, 3995/2009, 6346/2009, 8562/2009, 8613/2009, 8827-8846/2009, 9251/2009, 10494/2009, 10997/2009, 11024-11027/2009, 12016/2009, 12268 & 12269/2009,

Scottish Widows plc (Appellant) Vs. Commissioners for Her Majesty's Re ...

Court : UK Supreme Court

Subject : MRTP

Revell v Edinburgh Life Insurance Co (1906) 5 TC 221, 227. The Crown option was abolished by the Finance Act 2007 and replaced by mandatory provisions. With a mutual life office the Revenue never had a choice, since mutual … in line 15 of the Company's form 40 must be taken as falling within the scope of either section 83(2) or section 83(3) of the Finance Act 1989, as substituted by paragraph 16 of Schedule 8 to … to examine it, I would like to make these few brief comments. 29. The exercise to which section 83(3) is directed proceeds in two stages

M/s. Bharti Airtel Ltd. Vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

Secondary and Higher Education Cess on excisable goods leviable under section 136 read with section 138 of the Finance Act, 2007 (22 of 2007);(vii)(vii) the additional duty leviable under section 3 of Customs Tariff Act, equivalent to the duty … of the Cenvat Credit taken on tower, shelter, prefabricated building and other for the period in dispute:-YearsTowerShelterOthersTotal2004-05174368801478938Chair - 298,738Printer - 1,224,53720,439,1002005-0644142943 441429432006-071591920315384719 313039222007-082658803428174029 54762063Total104087060450376861523282150648028 16. Mr. Sridharan, learned Senior Counsel on behalf of the Appellant has made

D.R. Industries Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and 3 ors.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11AB, 11AC, 35, 35(1), 35B(1), 35B(5), 35A(4A) and 35E(3); Excise Act, 1980; Finance Act, 1980; Finance Act, 2001; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 4 to 24 and 29(2); Finance Act, 2007; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 173Q(1); Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1989 - Rule 17 and 17(2); Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226

Reported in : 2008(127)ECC61; 2008(153)LC61(Gujarat); 2008(229)ELT24(Guj)

period of three months. This period was earlier one year, but is now reduced to three months by Finance Act, 2007 - that is - within three months from the date of communication of the decision or order of … as prescribed in the Act, the Court will have the power to condone the delay. Sub-section (2) of Section 29 of the Limitation Act also provides that where any civil or local law prescribes a period of limitation

Airport Retail Pvt. Limited Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

use in the course or furtherance of business was included as a taxable service by virtue of the Finance Act, 2007 w.e.f. 01.06.2007 and clause (zzzz) was introduced in sub-section 105 of Section 65 of the Act. The said

Raymond Limited Vs. Raymond Pharmaceutical Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : MRTP

Wodka KG Vs. John Distilleries Ltd. 2011(4) Mh.L.J. 842 KSB Aktiengesellschaft and Anr. v. KSB Real Estate and Finance Private Ltd. in Notice of Motion No.4019 of 2007 Ford Motor Company and Anr. v. C.R.Borman and Anr. … Mark in their domain name and email address leading to infringement of the Mark under the provisions of Section 29(1) or 29(2) of the Trade Marks Act. The Defendants have denied all the allegations of misrepresentation, unauthorised use

KSB Aktiengesellschaft and Another Vs. Anil Agarwal

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

internationally well-known trade mark with a presence in India (KSB Aktiengesellschaft and Anr. v KSB Real Estate and Finance Private Limited; Notice of Motion No.4019 of 2007 in Suit No.2930 of 2007; decided on 11th February 2008). … is or must be deemed to be an unregistered proprietor or user at least for the purposes of Section 29(4) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 using dissimilar goods and, therefore, liable to suffer an injunction. If, on

Tata Teleservices Vs. Union of India

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Education

3.1 The respective petitioners have also prayed to declare that section 201 of the Act as amended by Finance Act, 2014 (Act No.2 of 2014) is prospective and does not apply to the proceedings where period of passing … Declare that the proceedings consequent to notice issued under Section 201 (1) of the Act for Financial Year 2007-08 are barred by the proviso to Section 201 (3); (G) Your Lordships may be pleased to Declare that … Summons dated 9/12/2014, impugned Notices dated 18/12/2014 and impugned Letters dated 18/12/2014, 29/12/2014 and 12/1/2015 issued by the respondent No. 2 are barred by limitation