Advanced Search Results

Narang Overseas (P) Ltd. Vs. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 220(6), 253(1), 253(2), 254 and 254(2A); Finance Act, 2007; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35B(1), 35C, 35C(2A); Constitution of India - Article 14; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC)

Reported in : 2008(2)BomCR853; (2007)211CTR(Bom)524; 2007(217)ELT497(Bom); 2007[8]STR117

Matched in: Citation 2008(2)BomCR853; (2007)211CTR(Bom)524; 2007(217)ELT497(Bom); 2007[8]STR117

Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Vs. M/s Pepsi Foods Ltd. (now Pepsic ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

order is concerned, would lead to great hardship, the legislature stepped in again and amended Section 254(2A) vide Finance Act, 2007 (w.e.f. 01/06/2007) as follows: “254. Orders of Appellate Tribunal. xxx xxx xxx (2A) In every appeal, the Appellate

Pepsi Foods Pvt. Ltd. (Now Merged With Pepsico Ind Vs. Assistant Commi ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

(supra) should also apply to the construction of the third proviso as introduced in Section 254(2A) by the Finance Act, 2007. The power to grant stay or interim relief being inherent or incidental is not defeated by the provisos

Ericsson Ab Vs. Addl. Director of Income Tax, Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

(supra) should also apply to the construction of the third proviso as introduced in Section 254(2A) by the Finance Act, 2007. The power to grant stay or interim relief being inherent or incidental is not defeated by the provisos

Aspect Software Inc Vs. Astt. Director of International Taxation and O ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

(supra) should also apply to the construction of the third proviso as introduced in Section 254(2A) by the Finance Act, 2007. The power to grant stay or interim relief being inherent or incidental is not defeated by the provisos

Pepsi Foods Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax and Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

(supra) should also apply to the construction of the third proviso as introduced in Section 254(2A) by the Finance Act, 2007. The power to grant stay or interim relief being inherent or incidental is not defeated by the provisos

Pepsi Foods Ltd. (Now Merged With Pepsico India Ho Vs. Deputy Commissi ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

(supra) should also apply to the construction of the third proviso as introduced in Section 254(2A) by the Finance Act, 2007. The power to grant stay or interim relief being inherent or incidental is not defeated by the provisos

Pepsi Foods Ltd. (Now Pepsico India Holdings) Vs. Deputy Commissioner ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

(supra) should also apply to the construction of the third proviso as introduced in Section 254(2A) by the Finance Act, 2007. The power to grant stay or interim relief being inherent or incidental is not defeated by the provisos

Star Television News Limited Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through the Secr ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 245A, 245(2A), 245C, 245C(1), 245C(3), 245D, 245D(1), 245D(1A), 245D(2A), 245D(2B), 245D(2C), 245D(2D), 245D(4), 245D(4A), 245D(4A)(1), 45D(4A)(2A), 45D(4A)(2D), 245D(4A)(4), 245H, 245H(1), 245HA, 245HA(3), 245(I), 245(4), 246C, 245HA(1), 245HA(2), 245HA(3) and 254(2A); Finance Act, 2007; Finance Act, 2008 - Sections 273AA, 273AA(1), 273AA(3), 278AB, 278AB(1) and 278AB(3); Taxation Law (Amendment) Act, 1975; Wealth-tax Act; Right to Information Act (RTI); Central Excise Act - Sections 35C(2A); Income Tax Rules - Rule 3; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16; Indian Penal Code

Reported in : 2009(111)BomLR3617; (2009)225CTR(Bom)140; [2009]317ITR66(Bom); [2009]184TAXMAN400(Bom)

legality of the provisions of Section 245HA(1)(iv) and Section 245HA(3) of the Income Tax Act as inserted by Finance Act, 2007 (hereinafter referred to as F.A. 2007) with effect from 1st June, 2007 as being ultra vires and violative … in Narang Overseas Pvt. Ltd. v. ITAT (2007) 295 ITR 22 (Bom.) read down the provisions of Section 254(2A) of the Act as amended by the 2007 Act which purported to curtail the power of the Tribunal

Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax - TDS Circle Vs. Vodafone Essar Guja ...

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Land Acquisition

(supra) should also apply to the construction of the third proviso as introduced in Section 254(2A) by the Finance Act, 2007. The power to grant stay or interim relief being inherent or incidental is not defeated by the provisos