Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: finance act 2007 section 23 · Page 1 of about 4,414 results (0.075 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 26 2014

M/s. Bharti Airtel Ltd. Vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-26-2014

Subject : Service Tax

Secondary and Higher Education Cess on excisable goods leviable under section 136 read with section 138 of the Finance Act, 2007 (22 of 2007);(vii)(vii) the additional duty leviable under section 3 of Customs Tariff Act, equivalent to the duty … further show cause cum demand notices were issued issued covering the period October 2005 to March 2008 dated 23.4.2007, 8.2.2008 and 23.10.2008 making an aggregate demand of Rs.15,40,63,898/- as also interest and equivalent penalty was demanded. 9.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 04 2009

Essar Steel Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Nov-04-2009

Subject : Customs

Acts : Finance Act, 2007 - Sections 99 and 114; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 7, 12, 22, 25, 28(1), 30 and 76A to 76N; Sea Customs Act; Special Economic Zones Act, 2005 - Sections 1, 2, 2(1), 3, 3(1), 4, 4(1), 4(2), 4(4), 5, 7, 12, 15(9), 26, 26(1), 26(2), 30, 51, 53, 53(1), 53(2) and 55; Motor Vehicles Act - Sections 38 and 38(1); Taxation Act - Sections 3, 3(1) and 4A; Trade Marks Act - Sections 28; Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 3; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 4 and 4(1); Factories Act, 1948; Sea Customs (Amendment) Act, 1955; Land Customs Act; Indian Aircrafts Act, 1911; Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - Sections 2, 2(15), 2(18), 2(19), 2(20), 2(22), 2(23), 2(25), 2(26), 2(27), 12, 14, 14(1), 17, 18, 46 and 50; Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951; Income

Reported in : [2010]24STT121

permitted the goods into the zone. By virtue of Section 114(n) read with the 3rd Schedule to the Finance Act, 2007, Heading No. 11 of the Second Schedule - Export Tariff to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 was substituted … No. 2 had also directed the Development Commissioners of SEZ throughout the country, vide its Circular letter dated 23-5-2008 to allow supply of steel products on submission of bond and bank guarantee. Notifications were issued by the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 15 2014

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-15-2014

Subject : Service Tax

referred to. This Appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 r/w Section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994 challenges the order passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (for short “CESTAT”) dated … Appeal No.57/2012 dated 23.04.2014, (8) The All India Federation of Tax Practitioners v/s Union of India reported in 2007(7) STR 625 (SC), (9) The Commissioner of Inland Revenue v/s Databank Systems Limited in Privy Council Appeal No.39/1989

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 19 2015

Pepsi Foods Ltd. (Now Merged With Pepsico India Ho Vs. Deputy Commissi ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-19-2015

Subject : Direct Taxation

(supra) should also apply to the construction of the third proviso as introduced in Section 254(2A) by the Finance Act, 2007. The power to grant stay or interim relief being inherent or incidental is not defeated by the provisos … W.P.(C) 1935/2014 and CM40542014 ….Petitioner PEPSI FOODS LTD. versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX &ORS ....Respondents + W.P.(C) 2326/2014 and CM48852014 ….Petitioner ERICSSON AB versus ADDL. DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, ORS ….Respondents + W.P.(C) 2465/2014 and CM51302014

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 23 2009

Indian National Shipowners' Association, a Company having Its register ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-23-2009

Subject : Service Tax

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 25; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 378; Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 65, 65(105), 65A, 65A(2), 66, 68(1) and 83; Finance Act, 2007; Finance Act, 2008; Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 2(9) and 3; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(31); Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 129(3), 129C and 129D; Service Tax Rules, 1994; Constitution of India - Articles 246, 276 and 276(1)

Reported in : 2009(5)BomCR369; 2009(111)BomLR1529; (2009)224CTR(Bom)197; [2009]17STJ255; 2009[14]STR289; [2009]19STT408; (2009)22VST293(Bom)

from the service consumer.7. Entry (zzzy) was inserted into Section 65(105) of the Finance Act, 1994 by the Finance Act, 2007. The said entry reads as under:Any service provided or to be provided to any person by any other … or gas will be comprehensively brought under the service tax net. 9. By a further Circular bearing No. 232/2/2006-CX dated 12/11/07 it was further clarified that post mining activities like transportation were not covered by the said

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 19 2015

Pepsi Foods Pvt. Ltd. (Now Merged With Pepsico Ind Vs. Assistant Commi ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-19-2015

Subject : Direct Taxation

(supra) should also apply to the construction of the third proviso as introduced in Section 254(2A) by the Finance Act, 2007. The power to grant stay or interim relief being inherent or incidental is not defeated by the provisos … W.P.(C) 1935/2014 and CM40542014 ….Petitioner PEPSI FOODS LTD. versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX &ORS ....Respondents + W.P.(C) 2326/2014 and CM48852014 ….Petitioner ERICSSON AB versus ADDL. DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, ORS ….Respondents + W.P.(C) 2465/2014 and CM51302014

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 19 2015

Ericsson Ab Vs. Addl. Director of Income Tax, Ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-19-2015

Subject : Direct Taxation

(supra) should also apply to the construction of the third proviso as introduced in Section 254(2A) by the Finance Act, 2007. The power to grant stay or interim relief being inherent or incidental is not defeated by the provisos … W.P.(C) 1935/2014 and CM40542014 ….Petitioner PEPSI FOODS LTD. versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX &ORS ....Respondents + W.P.(C) 2326/2014 and CM48852014 ….Petitioner ERICSSON AB versus ADDL. DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, ORS ….Respondents + W.P.(C) 2465/2014 and CM51302014

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 19 2015

Pepsi Foods Ltd. (Now Pepsico India Holdings) Vs. Deputy Commissioner ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-19-2015

Subject : Direct Taxation

(supra) should also apply to the construction of the third proviso as introduced in Section 254(2A) by the Finance Act, 2007. The power to grant stay or interim relief being inherent or incidental is not defeated by the provisos … W.P.(C) 1935/2014 and CM40542014 ….Petitioner PEPSI FOODS LTD. versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX &ORS ....Respondents + W.P.(C) 2326/2014 and CM48852014 ….Petitioner ERICSSON AB versus ADDL. DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, ORS ….Respondents + W.P.(C) 2465/2014 and CM51302014

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 19 2015

Aspect Software Inc Vs. Astt. Director of International Taxation and O ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-19-2015

Subject : Direct Taxation

(supra) should also apply to the construction of the third proviso as introduced in Section 254(2A) by the Finance Act, 2007. The power to grant stay or interim relief being inherent or incidental is not defeated by the provisos … W.P.(C) 1935/2014 and CM40542014 ….Petitioner PEPSI FOODS LTD. versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX &ORS ....Respondents + W.P.(C) 2326/2014 and CM48852014 ….Petitioner ERICSSON AB versus ADDL. DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, ORS ….Respondents + W.P.(C) 2465/2014 and CM51302014

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 19 2015

Pepsi Foods Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax and Ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-19-2015

Subject : Direct Taxation

(supra) should also apply to the construction of the third proviso as introduced in Section 254(2A) by the Finance Act, 2007. The power to grant stay or interim relief being inherent or incidental is not defeated by the provisos … W.P.(C) 1935/2014 and CM40542014 ….Petitioner PEPSI FOODS LTD. versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX &ORS ....Respondents + W.P.(C) 2326/2014 and CM48852014 ….Petitioner ERICSSON AB versus ADDL. DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, ORS ….Respondents + W.P.(C) 2465/2014 and CM51302014

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial