Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: finance act 2007 section 22d · Page 1 of about 5 results (0.022 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 20 2012

Sri P. Ramanaiah and Others Vs. Greater Hyderabad Municpal Corporation

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-20-2012

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Legal Services Authority Act, 1987 - Section 22-C, 22B, 22D, 22A (b), 22, 23, 22-B(1), 19, 22-C, 22D, 22E; Code of Civil Procedure,(CPC) 1908 - Sections 15, 20, 19; Evidence Act, 1872; Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 - Section 18(1)

and Rayalaseema in the first phase as proposed by the State Government. Thereafter the State Government in G.O.Ms.No.161, Finance, SMPC Department, dated 21-06-2006 accorded sanction for the post of Chairman and supporting staff for six Permanent Lok … Government. The State Government is being reminded periodically vide letters dated 15-10- 2007; 30-01-2008; 19-06-2008 and 12-03-2009, to expedite the establishment of PLAs in the … erred in stating that it is only a pre-litigation dispute resolution authority; (b) that notwithstanding the provisions of Section 22D of the 1987 Act, the relevant provisions of CPC and the principles underlying such provisions would apply and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 20 2012

Sri P. Ramanaiah and Others Vs. Greater Hyderabad Municpal Corporation ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-20-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

and Rayalaseema in the first phase as proposed by the State Government. Thereafter the State Government in G.O.Ms.No.161, Finance, SMPC Department, dated 21-06-2006 accorded sanction for the post of Chairman and supporting staff for six Permanent Lok … Government. The State Government is being reminded periodically vide letters dated 15-10- 2007; 30-01-2008; 19-06-2008 and 12-03-2009, to expedite the establishment of PLAs in the … erred in stating that it is only a pre-litigation dispute resolution authority; (b) that notwithstanding the provisions of Section 22D of the 1987 Act, the relevant provisions of CPC and the principles underlying such provisions would apply and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 13 2015

Amit Hemendra Jhaveri Vs. Union of India

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-13-2015

Subject : Direct Taxation

for the Assessment Years 1994-95 and 1995-96, were pending before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). 4. The Finance Act, 1998 introduced the KVSS, 1998 with effect from 1 September, 1998 providing for settlement of tax disputes pending … the Settlement Commission under sub-section (4) of section 245D of the Income Tax Act or sub-section (4) of section 22D of the Wealth Tax Act, as the case may be, for any assessment year, to any tax arrear

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 18 2016

M/s. D.P. Jain and Company Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-18-2016

Subject : Service Tax

tax amounting to Rs.10,25,72,125/- should not be demanded from it under the provisions of section 73(1) of the Finance Act, 1994. Interest under section 75 was proposed to be recovered and penalties under sections 76, 77 and 78 … the Hon ble Gujarat High Court centered around the interpretation of Item 22D and Item 68 in the first Schedule of the Central Excise Act, … (4) STR 527 (Tri. Del.) (ii) Commissioner of C. Ex. Ludhiana vs. Dr. Lal Path Lab (P) Ltd., 2007(8) STR 337 (P and H) (iii) Commissioner of Customs, Central Excise vs. Federal Bank Limited, 2013 (29) STR

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 09 2011

Nasser Zackeria, M/S Abad Fisheries, Kochi Vs. the Commissioner of Wea ...

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Dec-09-2011

Subject : Direct Taxation

by a Division Bench of the Madras High Court in Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Co. Ltd. [(2007) 294 ITR 438 (Mad.)] and the appeal preferred by the Department/Revenue was dismissed, upholding the … or section 29 or section 35 or any order of the Wealth-tax Settlement Commission under sub-section (4) of Section 22D, the amount on which interest was payable under clause (a) has been increased or reduced, as the case … for interest on refund of the tax paid under the Wealth Tax Act, stating that the tax paid was not in response to any ‘demand’

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial