Advanced Search Results

Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation Vs. C ...

Court : UK Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

rely on section 320 of the Finance Act 2004 ("Section 320 FA 2004") or section 107 of the Finance Act 2007 ("Section 107 FA 2007") to exclude DMG mistake claims, as these provisions purported to curtail the extended limitation period … observed, para 406), "the outcome of those appeals was, at the time, impossible to predict with any confidence." 106. The BAT group started its proceedings on 18 June 2003, a month before Park J's judgment in DMG.

Premier Associates Vs. The Assistant Commissioner of Service Tax,

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

liability of interest or penalty thereon shall be adjudicated as per the provisions of Chapter V of the Finance Act, 1994 and paid accordingly. The immunity from interest and penalty is only for ‘tax dues’ declared under VCES’.7. … only stipulates that the tax due for the period from 1st October 2007 to 31st December 2012, which was due and not paid as on … of Service Tax & Others. Date of Order 28-11-2017 W.P.No.3824/2016 5/16 Form VCES-1 dated 31-12-2013, in terms of Section 106(2) read with Section 106(1) of Finance Act, 2013 (17 of 2013), Chapter VI, Service Tax Voluntary Compliance Encouragement

M/s. Hotel Southson Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Customs, Excise Service Tax Appella ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Service Tax

the Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue clarifying the provisions of Section 106(2) of the Finance Act, 2013 that if an inquiry, investigation or audit pending as on 1.3.2013 was being carried out for the … (VCES) for all those persons who have failed to pay service tax dues for the period 1 October 2007 to 31 December 2012. In view of the said scheme, the petitioner submitted an application dated 21.6.2013 before

Digi Studio and Color House Vs. the Commissioner of Central

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2008)10STR31

by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs & Service Tax (Appeals), Cochin.Rs. 26,162/- Under Section 73 of the Finance Act, 1994 with interest Under Section 75.Rs. 78,106/- Under Section 73 of the Finance Act, 1994 with interest Under

Commr. of C. Ex. Vs. Patient Service Centre

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : 2008[9]STR229; [2007]14STT92

Matched in: Citation 2008[9]STR229; [2007]14STT92

Orix Auto Infrastructure Services Ltd. Vs. Commissioner, Dvat, Delhi a ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

subject matter of tax. Reliance is placed upon the decision of the Supreme Court in M/s 20th Century Finance Corporation Limited and Another versus State of Maharashtra, (2000) 119 STC182 Union of India and Others versus Bombay … this sub-section shall be valid up to the 31st day of March, 2007: PROVIDED FURTHER that the provisions of this sub-section shall not apply where … day of April, 2005 shall continue to have effect as if this Act has not been passed.” 10. Section 106 is a repeal and a savings clause. As already noticed above, the Act repeals four earlier enactments by

Tata Steel Limited and ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Sales Tax/VAT

Reported in : [2008(3)JCR365(Jhr)]

2007. Immediately thereafter, in order to give effect to the amended provisions, a notification was issued by the Finance Department vide S.O. No. 48 dated 29.8.2008 describing the procedure for levy and collection of tax on import … (in short 'VAT Act') and subsequent amendments made in the said Act by Jharkhand Value Added Tax (Amendment) Act, 2007 (in short Amendment Act, 2007').6. In the VAT Act, 2005, preamble of the Act reads as under:An Act … In all these writ petitions, the petitioners have challenged the vires of Section 11 of the Jharkhand Value Added Tax Act, 2005 as ultra vires

Diamond Apartments Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Abanar Marketing Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Arbitration

to be pursued. Mr.Mitra has referred to the decision of the Madras High Court in India Cements Capital Finance Limited versus Kwality Spinning Mills LTD.& Others reported at [2000].102 Company Cases 523 (Mad.) and submitted that mere … had served a notice to quit dated 25th claimant, however, the The plaintiff, in fact, September, 2013 under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 calling upon the defendant to deliver vacant and peaceful possession of

Justice k.s.puttaswamy(retd) Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

the constitution of UIDAI, allocation of Rs.147.31 crores for Phase I of Aadhaar enrolments was approved by the Finance Minister on the recommendation of the Standing Committee on Finance. Demo-Official letter dated February 25, 2009, was sent … formats were discussed. Thereafter, in its fifth meeting held on April 27, 2007, it was decided that the evolution of UID database would be in … No.494 of 2012 & c onnected matters Page 106 of 567 We are in the age of … of the Indian Constitution. The petitioners have challenged the Aadhaar project which took off by way of administrative action in the year 2009. Even after Aadhaar got a shield of statutory cover, challenge persists as the very … Aadhaar and the architecture built thereupon has received scathing criticism from a section of the society. According to them, Aadhaar is a serious invasion into

Sainsbury's Supermarkets Ltd, R (on the application of) Vs. Wolverhamp ...

Court : UK Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

Raglan Street site came before the Council's Planning Committee on March 13, 2007 when it was resolved to grant both applications subject to various requirements. … the CPO. The fact that a link between the two developments could be achieved by an agreement under section 106 of the 1990 Act did not entitle the Council to treat what were in reality well-being benefits resulting … the whole proposed development on the basis that the desirable improvements to the Opera House could not be financed unless the offices were permitted. The applicants sought judicial review of that decision on the ground, inter alia,