Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: finance act 2007 section 102 · Page 1 of about 356 results (0.050 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 18 2012

Commissioner of Service Tax, Mumbai and Another Vs. P.N. Writer and Co ...

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-18-2012

Subject : Service Tax

comes under the category of taxable service of ‘storage and warehousing’ as defined in Section 65(102) of the Finance Act, 1994 and therefore, they are liable to pay service tax on the said activity under Section 65(105)(zza) of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 16 2022

Union Of India Vs. Bharat Forge Limited

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-16-2022

Subject : MRTP

and on the concerned officer or jurisdictional officer in respect of the applicant. Section 103(1A) inserted by the Finance Act, 2019, amplifies the scope of advance ruling, as provided therein. An advance ruling can become void in certain … detailed procedure, which includes an original Authority, an Appellate Authority and a National Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling. Section 102 40 provides for rectification of advance ruling. Section 103 provides that the advance ruling shall be binding on

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 27 2022

Vijay Madanlal Choudhary Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-27-2022

Subject : Land Acquisition

twin conditions. The second situation is said to be even more damaging given that the substitution by the Finance Act, 2018 is targeted only to this classification of Part-A of the Schedule, since the Court in the reported … at Footnote No.154 156 2021 SCC OnLine SC440157 Supra at Footnote No.3 102 substitution of this pre-existing term cannot appear on the statute book due … Consideration • The 2002 Act 19-22 • Preamble of the 2002 Act 23-24 • Definition Clause 25-36 • Section 3 of the 2002 Act 37-55 • Section 5 of the 2002 Act 56-70 • Section 8 of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 13 2019

Rojer Mathew Vs. South Indian Bank Ltd and Ors Chief Manager

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-13-2019

Subject : Land Acquisition

CJI1 Leave granted. BRIEF BACKGROUND:2. In the present batch of cases, the constitutionality of Part XIV of the Finance Act, 2017 and of the rules framed in consonance has been assailed. While it would be repetitious to reproduce … From Hewart to Leggatt” 28 TRAS51(2009) 6 Excerpts from the ‘Explanatory Notes to the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act, 2007’ prepared by the Ministry of Justice, British Parliament. 10 II. Canada 23. The Tribunal system in Canada, although … petitioner had originally approached the High Court challenging the constitutional validity of Section 13 (5- A) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 11 2023

In Re Article 370 Of The Constitution

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-11-2023

Subject : Right to Information

the Legislative Council. Part VI provides for the High Court and the “subordinate courts”. Part VIII provides for Finance, Property and Contracts; Part IX for the Public Services; Part X for Elections and Part XI for Miscellaneous … the State of Jammu and Kashmir for a declaration that the Jammu and Kashmir Big Landed Estate Abolition Act 2007 was “void, inoperative and ultra vires of Yuvraj Karan Singh who enacted it” so that the appellant could … Senior Advocate. 101 Written Submissions of Ms. Nitya Ramakrishnan, Senior Advocate, Rejoinder. 102 Mr R Venkataramani, the Attorney General for India made prefatory submissions which … the Proclamations issued under Article 356 of the Constitution of India and Section 92 of the Constitution of Jammu and Kashmir .................................................................................... 112 iii. Limitations

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 23 2013

R (on the Application of Prudential Plc and Another) Vs. Special Commi ...

Court : UK Supreme Court

Decided on : Jan-23-2013

Subject : Right to Information

necessary implication is a matter of express language and logic not interpretation". 5. Section 20A, inserted by the Finance Act 1976 ("the 1976 Act"), empowered an inspector to call for documents to be produced by a person who … Courts and Legal Services Act 1990, which has now been superseded by section 190 of the Legal Services Act 2007. Section 190(2) of the 2007 Act provides that where advocacy, litigation, conveyancing or probate services are provided by individuals … Brougham LC in Greenough v Gaskell (1833) 1 My and K 98, 102-103. (Litigation privilege seems to have developed rather later “ see per Lord

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 20 2013

Uma Maheswari Vs. the State

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-20-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

NCH No.2298, 2299 and 2300 of the petitioners passed by the order dated 18.6.2013 issued by Repco Home Finance Ltd, Plot No.4055, U  Block, No.10, 4th Main Road, Anna Nagar, Chennai-600 040 and direct the Repco … offence.33. In seizing the properties, the investigating officer has to follow certain procedures. That has been prescribed in Section 102 Cr.P.C. It runs as under : ".102.Power of police officer to seize certain property.-(1)Any Police Officer may seize … the F.I.R as such they do not disclose the offences alleged. What actually is purely a civil transaction, breach of terms and conditions of an

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 23 2012

Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation Vs. C ...

Court : UK Supreme Court

Decided on : May-23-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

rely on section 320 of the Finance Act 2004 ("Section 320 FA 2004") or section 107 of the Finance Act 2007 ("Section 107 FA 2007") to exclude DMG mistake claims, as these provisions purported to curtail the extended limitation period … by the Court of Justice, but para 20 of its judgment appears to be in line with it. 102. I have quoted this passage at some length because it seems to me to touch on what is,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 26 2008

Davis Vs. Federal Election Comm’n

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jun-26-2008

Subject : MRTP

U. S. 1 , the Court soundly rejected a cap on a candidate’s expenditure of personal funds to finance campaign speech, holding that a “candidate … has a First Amendment right to … vigorously and tirelessly … … Davis v. Federal Election Comm창™n - 07-320 (2008) SYLLABUS OCTOBER TERM, 2007 DAVIS V. FEDERAL ELECTION COMM'N SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES DAVIS … v. Lyons , 461 U. S. 95 , 102. Davis faced the requisite injury from §319(a) when … equally to all competitors for a seat and their authorized committees. However, §319(a) of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 (BCRA), 2 U. S. C. §441a-1(a), part of the so-called “Millionaire’s Amendment,” fundamentally alters this scheme … §319 is unconstitutional and an injunction preventing the FEC from enforcing the section during the 2006 election. The District Court concluded sU. S.onte that Davis

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 26 2014

M/s. Bharti Airtel Ltd. Vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-26-2014

Subject : Service Tax

Secondary and Higher Education Cess on excisable goods leviable under section 136 read with section 138 of the Finance Act, 2007 (22 of 2007);(vii)(vii) the additional duty leviable under section 3 of Customs Tariff Act, equivalent to the duty

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial