Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: finance act 2006 section 69 · Page 1 of about 1,288 results (0.084 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 17 2015

Delhi Transport Corporation Vs. Commissioner Service Tax

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-17-2015

Subject : Service Tax

to pay Education Cess on the tax levied and calculated under Section 91 read with Section 66.16. By Finance Act, 2006, Section 65 (105) was amended to add the following to the categories of “taxable service”:"(zzzm) to any person, by … for each of the three periods, ₹5,000/- under Section 77(1) for not obtaining the registration in accordance with Section 69, ₹5,000/- under Section 77(2) generally for the contravention of the statutory provisions relating to the service tax and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 11 2008

Indian National Shipowners Association Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-11-2008

Subject : Service Tax

Acts : Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 5(2), 64, 65, 65(105), 66, 66A, 68, 68(2), 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 and 94; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 25; Merchant Shipping Act, 1958; Territorial Waters, Continental Shelf, Exclusive Economic Zone, and other Maritime Zones Act, 1976 - Sections 6(6) and 7(7); Factories Act, 1948; Societies Registration Act, 1860; Central Excise Act, 1944; Finance Act, 2005; Finance Act, 2006; Service Tax Rules, 1994 - Rule 2 and 2(1); Central Excise Rules; Constitution of India - Article 265

Reported in : (2009)222CTR(Bom)234; [2009]16STJ175; 2009[13]STR235

It appears that it is first time when the Act was amended and Section 66A was inserted by Finance Act, 2006 w.e.f. 18-4-2006, the Respondents got legal authority to levy service tax on the recipients of the taxable service. … Section 68 requires every person providing the taxable service to collect the service tax at the specified rate. Section 69 of the Finance Act, 1994 provided for the registration of a person responsible for collecting service tax. Sub-section

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 29 2006

Vindhyachal Distilleries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-29-2006

Subject : Service Tax

Acts : Finance Act, 2005 - Sections 65(76), 68 and 69; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 2; Madhya Pradesh Excise Act, 1915; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 65, 66 and 68(1); Madhya Prades General Sales Tax Act, 1958 - Sections 2; Madhya Pradesh Country Spirit Rules, 1995; Madhya Pradesh Country Spirit Rules, 1995 - Rules 2A and 3(3); Service Tax Rules, 1994 - Rules 4A, 4A(1) and 6; Service Tax (Amendemnt), Rules 1997 - Rule 2; Service Tax Rules, 1944

Reported in : (2007)7VST197(MP)

of Rs. 2.25 per bottle.4. The petitioner M/s. Vindhyachal Distilleries Pvt. Ltd. got the registration certificate (P-6) under Section 69 of the Finance Act. After registration the distillers demanded the service tax @ 10.2% on the packaging/sealing charges … Distilleries Pvt. Ltd. (in W.P. No. 2346/2006).3. It is further averred that on 16.6.2005 Section 65(76)(b) of the Finance Act, 2005 was amended and 'Packaging Activity' was also brought within the ambit of service tax. On 9th September,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 30 2007

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Mangalam Cement Ltd.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : May-30-2007

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2007)7STR673

in one case (Service Tax Appeal No. 2/23 of 2005) of Rs. 60,26,508/- under Section 73(2) of the Finance Act, 1994, imposing penalty of Rs. 48,700/- under Section 76 and ordering interest amount of Rs. 8,84,287/- under Section … of the Central Government. Notwithstanding anything contained in the provisions of Sections 69 and 70, the provisions thereof shall not apply to a person referred … He further relied upon the decision of this Tribunal in J&K Industries Ltd. v. CCE Indore, reported in 2006(3) STR 14, more particularly on paragraphs 8 and 9 of the judgment and the decision in Indian Farmers

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 11 2009

N. Meenakshi Vs. the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-11-2009

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 10, 16A(1), 16A(2), 16A(3), 16A(4), 16A(5), 16A(6), 48, 50C, 50C(2), 55A, 69, 69A, 69B, 69C, 129, 142A, 142(2A), 143(3), 147, 153, 153(1), 153(3), 142, 245C, 245D(1), 245R(3), 245Q(1), 246A, 250, 254, 260, 262, 263 and 264; Indian Stamp Act - Sections 47A; Finance Act, 2006; Finance Act, 2007; Wealth-tax Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 16A, 23A, 24, 34AA, 35, 37 and 38A; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226

Reported in : (2009)226CTR(Mad)625

Sub-section (5) of Section 139, whichever is later and the periods of limitation are varied by insertion through Finance Act, 2006 with effect from 1.6.2006 and Finance Act, 2007 with effect from 1.6.2007. However, Section 153(3) of the Act … assessment or reassessment under this Act, where an estimate of the value of any investment referred to in Section 69 or Section 69B or the value of any bullion, jewellery or other valuable article referred to in Section

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 15 2008

Magus Construction Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors ...

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : May-15-2008

Subject : Service Tax

to the petitioner, whereby the petitioner-company has been asked to get itself registered under Section 69 of the Finance Act, 1994 (hereinafter referred to as, 'the Finance Act, 1994'), inasmuch as the petitioner-company has been, according to respondent … business of development and sale of immovable property, i.e., real estate, have impugned a notice, dated March 6, 2006 issued by respondent No. 3, namely, Superintendent of Central Excise, to the petitioner, whereby the petitioner-company has been

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 01 2012

Rakesh Kumar Goyal Vs. Nct of Delhi and Another

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jun-01-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

cognizance is dated 15th January, 2008 and the notification and amendment by way of Section 69 of the Finance Act 2008 came into force only on 10th May, 2008. Thus, even on the date of issuance of the … officer of Customs to summon any person to give evidence. By Section 25 of the Taxation Laws Amendment Act, 2006 Section 108 of the Customs Act was amended with effect from 13th July, 2006 and it entitled a Gazetted

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 11 2022

Commissioner Of Central Excise Raipur Vs. M/s Sepco Electric Power Con ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-11-2022

Subject : Service Tax

Central Excise, Raipur to the respondent under Section 73 read with Sections 65, 66 and 68 of the Finance Act, 1994 demanding the service tax along with interest under Section 75 and for imposition of penalty under Sections … Court in the case of M.N. Dastur Limited v. Union of India, 2006 (2) STR532CAL. It is further submitted that the aforesaid two decisions have … as if he is the person liable for paying the service tax in relation to such service. Registration. Section 69 (1) Every person liable to pay the service tax under this Chapter or the rules made thereunder shall,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 27 2006

Saj Flight Services (P) Ltd. Vs. Supdt. of Central Excise

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Feb-27-2006

Subject : Service Tax

Acts : Finance (No. 2) Act, 2004 - Sections 66 and 69; Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 65(24); Finance Rules, 2004; Finance Act, 2004 - Sections 65(24) and 69

Reported in : (2006)201CTR(Ker)490; 2006(2)KLT73; 2006[4]STR432

Matched in: Citation (2006)201CTR(Ker)490; 2006(2)KLT73; 2006[4]STR432

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 08 2008

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Amit Kumar Maheshwari

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Dec-08-2008

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : 2009[13]STR119; (2009)22VST397(Raj)

Monday positively.Sd/-21/9/04Asstt. Comm. (ST).*********137/39/2004-CX.AnnexureForm of DeclarationTo,The Designated Authority:Sir,I hereby make the declaration for being registered in terms of Section 69 of the Finance Act, 1994 (32 of 1994).1. Name: ___________________________________2. Address of the business premises: ________3. Date of … on different types of business, did not get registration as required by the relevant chapter, introduced by the Finance Act, 1994, relating to imposition of Service Tax, hereafter referred to as the 'Service Tax Act', and notices were … case, and Anr. judgment in Amit Kumar Maheshwari v. CCE reported in 2006 (2) S.T.R. 506.5. Thus, in substance, the controversy is, as to whether

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial