Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: finance act 2006 section 61 · Page 1 of about 1,384 results (0.081 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 31 2006

Shyamal Kumar Roy Vs. Sushil Kumar Agarwal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-31-2006

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 2(14), 31, 32, 33, 35, 36, 38, 39, 40 and 61; Indian Stamp (West Bengal Amendment) Act, 1990; West Bengal Finance Act, 2006; West Bengal Act - Sections 33(4) and 33(5); Marwar Stamp Act, 1947; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 151

Reported in : AIR2007SC637; (SCSuppl)2007(1)CHN15; JT2006(9)SC483; (2007)1MLJ617(SC); 2006(11)SCALE159; (2006)11SCC331; 2007AIRSCW234

Matched in: Citation AIR2007SC637; (SCSuppl)2007(1)CHN15; JT2006(9)SC483; (2007)1MLJ617(SC); 2006(11)SCALE159; (2006)11SCC331; 2007AIRSCW234

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 21 2026

Tannia Rikhy and Others vs Sunrider India Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-21-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

been brought under the ambit of Service Tax, with effect from 01.06.2007 by virtue of implementation of the Finance Act, 2007. The Defendants, requested the Plaintiff to expedite the payment of Service Tax with immediate effect, so as … that the amount of Rs.10,50,000/-, which was given to the Defendants as interest free security deposit in August 2006, would be handed over to the Plaintiff, when they vacated the Suit Property. 14. The Plaintiff also paid … Signed By:ANIL KUMAR BHATT Signing Date:21.05.2026 17:16:57 1. Regular First Appeal under Section 96 read with Order XLI Rule 1 of the Code of Civil

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 12 2008

Total Network Sl (a Company Incorporated in Spain) (Original Responden ...

Court : House of Lords

Decided on : Mar-12-2008

Subject : Service Tax

of a similar nature which it specifies. 17. Secondly, section 55A was added by section 19(1) of the Finance Act 2006, together with section 26AB which provides for the adjustment of accounts to give effect to it. It introduced … recovered in cases of dishonest evasion of VAT or the making of false input tax or repayment claims. Section 61 extends liability to a civil penalty to the director or managing officer where the person liable under section

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 18 2016

M/s. D.P. Jain and Company Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-18-2016

Subject : Service Tax

reconditioning on restoration, or servicing of any goods, excluding a motor vehicle and also substituted it by the Finance Act, 2006 with effect from 1st May, 2006. It also substituted the Explanation below section 65(64) with effect from 15th … 2012 directing deposit of Rs.3 crores. That was on the prima facie view as reflected from that order. 61. This order on the stay application was challenged before this court in Central Excise Appeal (L) No. 137

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 20 2009

Tanfac Industries Ltd. Vs. the Assistant Commissioner of Customs, Cust ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-20-2009

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 15, 18, 25, 58, 59, 61, 61(1), 61(2) and 68; Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - Sections 3

Reported in : 2009(165)LC186(Madras)

of warehoused goods when duty paid through DEPB debit.Circular No. 26/2007-Cus., dated 20.7.2007F. No. 475/04/2006-LCGovernment of IndiaMinistry of Finance (Department of Revenue)Central Board of Excise & Customs, New Delhi.Subject : Waiver of interest on goods cleared from … No. 26/07, dated 20.7.2007 is legally correct ?ii) Whether the appellant is liable to pay the interest under Section 61(2) of the Customs Act, when no duty is paid in cash, as having been exempted as per Notification

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 22 2008

Gkw Limited and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Feb-22-2008

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : AIR2008Raj90; RLW2008(2)Raj1627

Bhandari, J.1. In all these writ petitions, a challenge has been made to the Chapter VII to Rajasthan Finance Act, 2006 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act of 2006') and Rules framed thereunder, as well as consequential notification issued. … 2006. After the enactment, the Government even framed Rules on 25.9.2006 in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 61 of the Act of 2006. According to the petitioners, even the imposition of land tax pursuant to Chapter

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 24 2008

Areva T and D India Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax and ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-24-2008

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 50B, 54EC, 54EC(1) and 119(2); Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 391 and 394; Finance Act, 2006; Finance Act, 2007; Finance Act, 2001; National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development Act, 1981 - Sections 3; National Highways Authority of India Act, 1988 - Sections 3; National Housing Bank Act, 1987 - Sections 3(1); Small Industries Development Bank of India Act, 1989 - Sections 3(1); Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 265; Securities and Exchange Board of India Regulations

Reported in : (2008)220CTR(Mad)156; [2009]177TAXMAN192(Mad)

capital gains on sale of long-term capital assets in specified assets to be eligible to claim exemption. The Finance Act, 2006 restricted the scope and limited the meaning of 'long-term specified asset' to bonds notified by the Government of … 8] along with the words 'subject to the following conditions, namely,' issued by the CBDT are ultra vires Section 54EC of the IT Act, 1961 and arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 265 of the Constitution

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 21 2009

M.i.D.C. Industries Association Chandrapur Vs. Maharashtra Electricity ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Decided on : Jul-21-2009

Subject : Electricity

notified by the Government of India, which states at para 5.3, as under: (h) Multi Year Tariff 1) Section 61 of the Act states that the Appropriate Commission, for determining the terms and conditions for the determination of … to submit the first Application for determination of multi year tariff for the first Control Period of 3 financial years, i.e., FY 2006-07, FY 2007-08 and FY 2008-09, by 30th November 2005. By a subsequent Order, the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 26 2006

Siel Limited Vs. the Punjab State Electricity

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Decided on : May-26-2006

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : (2006)LCAPTEL931

Matched in: Citation (2006)LCAPTEL931

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 10 2019

Mahindra Electric Mobility Limited and Anr. Vs.cci and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-10-2019

Subject : MRTP

have been taken over by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (hereafter “NCLAT”) due to provisions of the Finance Act, 2017. Though by amendments, the petitioners have impugned provisions of the Finance Act nevertheless, they do not press … 70 years; for member it is sixty-five years. Petroleum Regulation 112. The Petroleum and Natural Gas Regulatory Board Act, 2006 (hereafter as “the PNGRB Act”) was framed to promote competitive markets and protect the interests of consumers by … equality before law, and equal protection of law is violated. Counsel submitted that the bar to jurisdiction under Section 61 of the Act underscores the fact that the task performed by CCI is essentially judicial, ordinarily performed by

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial