Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: finance act 2006 section 52 · Page 1 of about 1,638 results (0.093 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 21 2026

Tannia Rikhy and Others vs Sunrider India Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-21-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

been brought under the ambit of Service Tax, with effect from 01.06.2007 by virtue of implementation of the Finance Act, 2007. The Defendants, requested the Plaintiff to expedite the payment of Service Tax with immediate effect, so as … that the amount of Rs.10,50,000/-, which was given to the Defendants as interest free security deposit in August 2006, would be handed over to the Plaintiff, when they vacated the Suit Property. 14. The Plaintiff also paid … Page 13 of 15 Digitally Signed By:ANIL KUMAR BHATT Signing Date:21.05.2026 17:16:57 52. At this stage, it would also be pertinent to refer to Letter … Signed By:ANIL KUMAR BHATT Signing Date:21.05.2026 17:16:57 1. Regular First Appeal under Section 96 read with Order XLI Rule 1 of the Code of Civil

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 21 2007

Neolite Polymer Industries Pvt. Ltd. a Company Incorporated Under the ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-21-2007

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Stamps Act, 1899 - Sections 2(3), 2(14), 2(15), 3, 4, 33, 35, 36, 40, 42(1) and 42(2) - Schedule - Articles 13 and 45; Bills of Exchange Act, 1882 - Sections 51, 51(1), 52, 52(3) and 57; Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 80, 104 and 134; Finance Act, 2006; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 37

Reported in : 2007(6)BomCR539; (2007)109BOMLR1930

evidence, unless such instrument is duly stamped. Clause (a) of the proviso prior to its amendment by the Finance Act of 2006 was to the following effect:(a) any such instrument not being an instrument chargeable with a duty … are 'inland bills' for the purpose of the Bills of Exchange Act, 1882 in England. Sub-section (1) of Section 52 of the English Act provides that when a Bill is accepted generally, presentment for payment is not necessary

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 11 2011

Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs (Appellant) Vs. To ...

Court : UK Supreme Court

Decided on : May-11-2011

Subject : MRTP

as "the most fundamental reform of personal tax administration for 50 years"). The changes were introduced by the Finance Act 1994 ("FA 1994") and took effect, for income tax and capital gains tax purposes, in 1996-97. Further amendments … procedural issue concerns the effect of two closure notices dated 20 June 2006 signed by Mr Peter Frost, an officer in the Anti-Avoidance Group (Investigation) … or otherwise deal with any of the software in question." The various statutory conditions are brought together by section 52, which specifies the percentages for FYAs. It is common ground that LLP2 was a small enterprise. Originally HMRC

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 11 2021

M.m. Aqua Technologies Ltd. Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Delhi - Ii ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-11-2021

Subject : Direct Taxation

In para 8, the judgment then set out Section 43B with Explanation 3C, which was inserted by the Finance Act, 2006 6 retrospectively w.e.f. 1.4.1989. The High Court concluded, based on Explanation 3C, as follows: “10. Now, Explanation 3C, … meant to be affected. In similar circumstances, in K.P. Varghese v. ITO, (1981) 4 SCC173 this Court construed Section 52 of the Income Tax Act as applying only to cases where ‘understatement’ is be found - an ‘understatement’

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 07 2016

Simplex Infrastructures Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Service Tax, Kolkata

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-07-2016

Subject : Service Tax

service tax for the fiRs.time was introduced in India in the year 1994 under Chapter V of the Finance Act, 1994. It has been amended from time to time, inter alia, by introducing more categories of services within … Banerjee, J.: (1) In the instant writ petition, the petitioner challenges a show cause-cum-Demand Notice dated 21st April, 2006 demanding service tax of Rs.65.25 crores (approx.) for the period 1st October, 2000 to 31st March, 2005 and … civil engineering construction and was not ‘consulting engineer’ within the meaning of Section 65(11) of the Finance Act, 1994. (as amended by Finance Act, 1997).(6)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 16 2009

Bharti Airtel Ltd. (Formerly Bharti Tele Ventures Ltd.) Rep. by Its He ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-16-2009

Subject : Sales Tax/VAT

Acts : Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 - Sections 2(15), 2(29), 3 and 39; Karnataka Value Added Tax Rules; Companies Act, 1956; Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 - Sections 4; Finance Act, 1994; Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Sections 2(7); Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 2(22) and 12; Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 2; Kerala General Saks Act 1963 - Sections 2(7); Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 39; Sales Tax Act; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 19, 19(1), 226, 246, 366(12) and 366(29A)

Reported in : (2009)22VST465(Karn); 2009(3)AIRKarR235(D.B)

It has also been registered with the 5th respondent, namely, the Commissioner of Service Tax, Bangalore under the Finance Act, 1994 and it has been regularly paying 'Service tax' in respect of the said service.(b) The Appellant Company … short) and consequent 12 notices of demand issued by him for the months of April 2005 to March 2006 demanding the tax from the appellant - company quantified thereunder. The learned Single Judge declined to interfere with … been granted license by the Government of India, Ministry of Telecommunications, under Section 4 of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 for providing 'broad hand services'

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 13 2008

Larsen and Toubro Limited Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Jun-13-2008

Subject : Sales Tax/VAT

Acts : Bihar Finance Act, 1981 - Sections 2, 13, 17(2), 17(3), 19, 19(1), 19(2), 21, 21(1), 47 and 58; Central Sales Tax Act; Rajasthan Sales Tax Act - Sections 5; Bihar Sales Tax Rules, 1983 - Rules 13, 13A, 15(3) and 18; Rajasthan Sales Tax Rules - Rule 29(2); Sales Tax (Amendment) Rules, 2000 - Rule 13A; Sales Tax (Amendment) Rules, 2006 - Rule 13A

Reported in : 2008(56)BLJR2126; [2008(3)JCR698(Jhr)]; (2009)24VST233(Jharkh)

the petitioner challenging the order of re-assessment dated 5/5/2006 passed under Sections 17(3) and 19 of the Bihar Finance Act. The writ petition was dismissed by this Bench on 27/11/2006 holding that the petitioner may avail the statutory … 2007.2. The writ petition was filed by the petitioner challenging the order of re-assessment dated 5/5/2006 passed under Sections 17(3) and 19 of the Bihar Finance Act. The writ petition was dismissed by this Bench on 27/11/2006

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 14 2012

Gujarat Ambuja Cements Ltd Vs. Cce, Chandigarh

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Feb-14-2012

Subject : Excise

the difficulty faced, the Legislature amended Central Excise Rules, 1944, retrospectively from 1944 onwards by Section 52 of Finance Act 1982 and the matter was at rest for over two decades. The amendments made through the retrospective amendment

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 21 1984

Anchor Line Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : May-21-1984

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [1984]10ITD63(Mum)

allowance.3. Section 44B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (the Act) which was inserted in the Act, by the Finance Act, 1975, with effect from the assessment year 1976-77, made a special provision for computing profits and gains of … not remediless and that would further buttress the above view. [Jagannath Singh v Dr. Ajay Upadyay & anr 2006 Cri LJ 4274; 2006 (5) AIR Bom R held per incuriam]. - We find that prior to coming … issued on 7-7-1964 and 14-1-1974 explaining the scope and object of section 52(2) of that Act were binding on the department in the administration and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 27 2015

PVP Ventures Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Corporate ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-27-2015

Subject : Direct Taxation

of the Revenue. In that case, the Assessing Officer reopened the assessment, upon receipt of information that various finance companies managed and controlled by Chartered Accountants were involved in providing accommodation entries to the assessee company. Therefore, … Section 69A. 5. Subsequently, the Assessing Officer passed a rectification order on 6.9.2011 under Section 154 of the Act. This order was for the purpose of adjustment of losses under the head Unabsorbed Depreciation and Business Loss

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial