Advanced Search Results

B.S. Enterprises Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Bihar Value Added Tax Act, 2005 - Sections 14, 16, 16(1), 24, 56(2), 93, 94 and 95; Bihar Finance Act, 1981; Bihar Finance Act, 2006; Central Sales Tax Act - Sections 8(4), 13(3), 13(4) and 15; Mysore Sales Tax Act - Sections 5(4); Bihar Value Added Tax Rules - Rules 13, 56, 56(1) and 56(2); Land Ceiling Act; High Denomination Bank Notes (Demonetisation) Act, 1978; Bihar Value Added Tax Ordinance, 2005 - Sections 1(3) and 2 to 99; Mysore Sales Tax Rules - Rule 39A(2) and 39A(3); Bihar Sales Tax Rules, 1983 - Rule 35; Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules - Rules 7(3) and 9; Central Sales Tax (Kerala) Rules - Rule 6(1)

the 1st day of April, 2005. Later, a number of amendments were introduced in the Act by Bihar Finance Act, 2006 (Act 7 of 2006). The amendment Act received the assent of the President of India on 19.04.2006 and … to extend, in appropriate cases, the period for furnishing details of stocks for claiming input tax credit under Section 16(1)(d) of the Bihar Value Added Tax Act, 2005? This is the common question arising in all the … No. 1 of 2005). It was published in the Official Gazette on 4.3.2005. Section 1(3) of the Ordinance provided that that section would come into

The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Chemplast Sanmar Limited

Court : Chennai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 50, 90, 90A, 115JA(1), 115JAA, 115JAA(4), 115JAA(5), 115JB, 139(1), 140A, 143(1), 208, 209, 210, 234A, 234B, 234B(1), 234B(2), 234C, 234C(1), 295 and 295(2); Finance Act, 2006; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 20; Land Reforms Act; Income Tax (19th Amendment) Rules, 2001; Income Tax Rules, 1962 - Rules 5 and 12(1)

Reported in : (2009)224CTR(Mad)211; [2009]314ITR231(Mad); [2009]180TAXMAN335(Mad)

Matched in: Advocate Pushya Sitaraman, Sr. Standing Counsel assisted by J. Narayanasamy, Adv. Venkatnarayanan, Adv. in T.C. Nos. 887/04, 2246, 2277, 2323, 2606, 2615 and 2656 of 2006, 10, 410, 717 and 1006 to 1008 of 2007 and 81 to 84, 245, 356, 543 and 578 of 2008, ;N. Quadin Hoseyn, Adv. in

Shyamal Kumar Roy Vs. Sushil Kumar Agarwal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 2(14), 31, 32, 33, 35, 36, 38, 39, 40 and 61; Indian Stamp (West Bengal Amendment) Act, 1990; West Bengal Finance Act, 2006; West Bengal Act - Sections 33(4) and 33(5); Marwar Stamp Act, 1947; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 151

Reported in : AIR2007SC637; (SCSuppl)2007(1)CHN15; JT2006(9)SC483; (2007)1MLJ617(SC); 2006(11)SCALE159; (2006)11SCC331; 2007AIRSCW234

Matched in: Citation AIR2007SC637; (SCSuppl)2007(1)CHN15; JT2006(9)SC483; (2007)1MLJ617(SC); 2006(11)SCALE159; (2006)11SCC331; 2007AIRSCW234

The Income-tax Officer Vs. Smt. Sukhini P. Modi, Smt. Radhika

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2008)112ITD1(Ahd.)

issuing any notice under this section, record his reasons for doing so.12. Certain Provisos are added by the Finance Act, 2006 to Section 148 to save the assessments completed on the assumption that no such notice need be issued … response to which the assessee had filed her return of income on 27.10.2000 for A.Y. 1997-98 at Rs. 47,673. In respect of Asst.Year 1996-97, the assessee vide her written submissions dated 22.6.2001, stated that the return filed

Asstt. Cit, Range 10(1) Vs. Citicorp Finance (India Ltd.)

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2007)108ITD457(Mum.)

has been amended by Section 10 of the Finance Act, 2002 and again by Section 7 of the Finance Act, 2006. Section 14A as so amended reads now as under: 14A. Expenditure incurred in relation to income not includible in … has erred in directing to allow exemption under Section 10(33) in respect of whole dividend income of Rs, 4,85,24,362 instead of the net income rightly determined by the assessing officer at Rs. 1, 17,21,951 2. Briefly stated,

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Jindal Exports Ltd. and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 2(1), 2(43), 16(3), 24(2), 90, 90A, 91, 115J, 115JA, 115JA(1), 115JAA, 115JAA(1), 115JAA(2), 115JAA(4), 115JAA(5), 119, 139, 140A, 140A(1), 142, 143, 143(1), 144, 147, 148, 154, 155, 158BC, 207, 208, 209, 209(1), 210, 215(2), 234A, 234B, 234B(1), 234B(2), 234C, 234C(1), 245D(4), 245D(6), 250, 254, 260, 262, 263 and 264; Finance Act, 2006; Direct Tax Laws (Amendment) Act, 1987; Finance Act, 1997; Finance (No. 2) Act, 1996

Reported in : (2009)221CTR(Del)8; [2009]314ITR137(Delhi); [2009]179TAXMAN391(Delhi)

Section 234C(1) of the IT Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the said Act') by virtue of the Finance Act, 2006, w.e.f. 1st April, 2007. According to the learned Counsel for the appellant/Revenue, after the said amendments, there is … interest under Section 234C of the IT Act, 1961?2. Question A has been formulated in IT Appeal Nos. 402 of 2005, 407 of 2007, 907 of 2007, 914 of 2007, 969 of 2007, 989 of 2007, 1350

Mahyco Monsanto Biotech (India) Pvt. Ltd. and Others Vs. THE UNION OF ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

impregnated seed is a service, and this is liable to be taxed under the relevant provisions of the Finance Act as amended, read with the Rules that pertain to service tax. This is a central levy. The transaction … India Pvt. Ltd. v State of Maharashtra, (2009) 40 MTJ 285; Second Appeal Nos. 1432 to 1438 of 2006 decided on 12th February 2009)as separate proceedings in that regard were pending. These were cases where the issue … Added Tax Act, 2002 ( the MVAT Act ); the definitions under Sections 65(105)(zzr), 65(55a) and 65(55b) of the Finance Act, 1994; and sub-clause (c) … G.S. Patel J. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction........................................................................ 4 II. Constitutional and Legislative Framework........................... 8 III. Facts in the Monsanto Petition

Neolite Polymer Industries Pvt. Ltd. a Company Incorporated Under the ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Stamps Act, 1899 - Sections 2(3), 2(14), 2(15), 3, 4, 33, 35, 36, 40, 42(1) and 42(2) - Schedule - Articles 13 and 45; Bills of Exchange Act, 1882 - Sections 51, 51(1), 52, 52(3) and 57; Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 80, 104 and 134; Finance Act, 2006; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 37

Reported in : 2007(6)BomCR539; (2007)109BOMLR1930

evidence, unless such instrument is duly stamped. Clause (a) of the proviso prior to its amendment by the Finance Act of 2006 was to the following effect:(a) any such instrument not being an instrument chargeable with a duty … order to preserve the recourse against the drawer or indorse. An inland Bill of Exchange is defined by Section 4 inter alia as one which is both drawn and payable within the British Isles. In the present case,

M/s. Total Environment Building Systems Pvt Ltd. Vs. The Deputy Commis ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service Tax

appeals is, “whether, service tax could be levied on Composite Works Contracts prior to the introduction of the Finance Act, 2007, by which the Finance Act, 1994 came to be amended to introduce Section 65(105)(zzzza) pertaining to Works … the impugned judgment and order dated 10.03.2010 passed by the CESTAT, West Zonal Bench in Appeal No.ST/275 of 2006, the Revenue has preferred the present Civil Appeal No.6792 of 2010. 3.8 Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the … …Appellant(s) Versus Union of India & Ors. …Respondent(s) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 4547-4548 OF2014M/s. National Building Construction Corporation Ltd. (NBCC) …Appellant(s) Versus Union of India

Indian National Shipowners' Association, a Company having Its register ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 25; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 378; Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 65, 65(105), 65A, 65A(2), 66, 68(1) and 83; Finance Act, 2007; Finance Act, 2008; Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 2(9) and 3; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(31); Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 129(3), 129C and 129D; Service Tax Rules, 1994; Constitution of India - Articles 246, 276 and 276(1)

Reported in : 2009(5)BomCR369; 2009(111)BomLR1529; (2009)224CTR(Bom)197; [2009]17STJ255; 2009[14]STR289; [2009]19STT408; (2009)22VST293(Bom)

to issue clarifications under Section 378 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with Section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994. Respondent 3 is the Commissioner of Service Tax and Respondent 4 is the Additional Commissioner (Technical) Service … : 1993ECR1(SC) and the judgment of this court in C.K.P. Mandal v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai : 2006(4)BomCR747 . Mr. Nankani submitted that the phrase 'in relation to' means that the activity must have a direct