Advanced Search Results

Shyamal Kumar Roy Vs. Sushil Kumar Agarwal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 2(14), 31, 32, 33, 35, 36, 38, 39, 40 and 61; Indian Stamp (West Bengal Amendment) Act, 1990; West Bengal Finance Act, 2006; West Bengal Act - Sections 33(4) and 33(5); Marwar Stamp Act, 1947; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 151

Reported in : AIR2007SC637; (SCSuppl)2007(1)CHN15; JT2006(9)SC483; (2007)1MLJ617(SC); 2006(11)SCALE159; (2006)11SCC331; 2007AIRSCW234

Matched in: Citation AIR2007SC637; (SCSuppl)2007(1)CHN15; JT2006(9)SC483; (2007)1MLJ617(SC); 2006(11)SCALE159; (2006)11SCC331; 2007AIRSCW234

Rama Newsprints and Paper Ltd. and Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2006)(104)ECC541

Matched in: Citation (2006)(104)ECC541

Oil and Natural Gas Corpn. Ltd Vs. State (Finance) and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Subject : Education

has rejected the challenge to the vires of the provisions of Sections 38(c) and 39 of the Rajasthan Finance Act, 2006 and Rule 24 of the Rajasthan Land Tax Rules, 2006; and has dismissed the writ petitions while extending … Rajasthan & Ors. wherein a co-ordinate Bench has rejected the challenge to the vires of the provisions of Sections 38(c) and 39 of the Rajasthan Finance Act, 2006 and Rule 24 of the Rajasthan Land Tax Rules,

Vijay Kumar Sharma Vs. State of Raj. and anr

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Subject : Land Acquisition

the rules framed thereunder have been complete violated while framing assessment orders. Definition of 'land' as given in Section 38 (c) of the Rajasthan Finance Act, 2006 has also not been taken into consideration. The provisional assessment lists … challenged the levy of land tax vide the demand notice dated 24.7.2009 (Annex-10), under the provisions of Rajasthan Finance Act, 2006 for assessment years 2009-10 raised by the Assessing Authority, (Sub-Registrar), Bikaner.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that

M/S. Shiva Mines and Mineral Vs. State of Raj. and anr

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Subject : Land Acquisition

the rules framed thereunder have been complete violated while framing assessment orders. Definition of 'land' as given in Section 38 (c) of the Rajasthan Finance Act, 2006 has also not been taken into consideration. The provisional assessment lists … challenged the levy of land tax vide the demand notices dated 05.06.2008 (Annex-5), under the provisions of Rajasthan Finance Act, 2006 for assessment years 2006-07 raised by the Assessing Authority, (Sub-Registrar), Kolayat.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that

M/S. Khetan Business Corp. Pvt. Ltd Vs. State of Raj. and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Subject : Education

has rejected the challenge to the vires of the provisions of Sections 38(c) and 39 of the Rajasthan Finance Act, 2006 and Rule 24 of the Rajasthan Land Tax Rules, 2006; and has dismissed the writ petitions while extending … of Rajasthan & ORS.wherein a co-ordinate Bench has rejected the challenge to the vires of the provisions of Sections 38(c) and 39 of the Rajasthan Finance Act, 2006 and Rule 24 of the Rajasthan Land Tax Rules,

M/S. Khetan Business Corp. Pvt. Ltd Vs. State and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Subject : Education

has rejected the challenge to the vires of the provisions of Sections 38(c) and 39 of the Rajasthan Finance Act, 2006 and Rule 24 of the Rajasthan Land Tax Rules, 2006; and has dismissed the writ petitions while extending … of Rajasthan & ORS.wherein a co-ordinate Bench has rejected the challenge to the vires of the provisions of Sections 38(c) and 39 of the Rajasthan Finance Act, 2006 and Rule 24 of the Rajasthan Land Tax Rules,

M/S.Malaysian Airlines. M/S.Saudi Arabian Airlines. and ors Vs. the Un ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

Acts : Constitution Of India - Article 226

under Article 226 of the Constitution of India are challenging imposition of penalty under section 38(3) of the Finance Act, 1979 ("Finance Act" or "Act" for short) for delay in payment of Foreign Travel Tax ("FTT" for short) … said order petitioner filed revision application before respondent No.4. The respondent No.4 vide his order dated 31st July, 2006 upheld the imposition of penalty of Rs.11,71,100/ as imposed by respondent No.2 on the basis of retrospective effect

Gkw Limited and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : AIR2008Raj90; RLW2008(2)Raj1627

Bhandari, J.1. In all these writ petitions, a challenge has been made to the Chapter VII to Rajasthan Finance Act, 2006 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act of 2006') and Rules framed thereunder, as well as consequential notification issued. … substantiate arguments, Learned Counsel for the petitioners referred to certain provisions of the impugned Act. Firstly, referring to Section 38 of the Act of 2006, it was focused that the definition of land as provided under Section 38

In the Matter Of: Damodar Valley Corporation Vs. Central Electricity R ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Direct Taxation

Appellant filed an Appeal before this Tribunal in Appeal No. 273 of 2006 raising various issues. The Tribunal ultimately passed order dated 23.11.2007 rejecting some … the Central Commission dated 6.8.2009 on the following issues:- i) Additional capitalisation. ii) Interest on capital as per Section 38 of the DVC Act. iii) Other capital being adjusted against depreciation. iv) Pay revision. v) Pension and gratuity … or by way of interest on loans. We direct the Central Commission to ensure that capital deployed in financing operating assets is getting fully serviced either through Return on Equity or interest on loan (including on the