Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: finance act 2006 section 33 · Page 1 of about 2,724 results (0.105 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 31 2006

Shyamal Kumar Roy Vs. Sushil Kumar Agarwal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-31-2006

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 2(14), 31, 32, 33, 35, 36, 38, 39, 40 and 61; Indian Stamp (West Bengal Amendment) Act, 1990; West Bengal Finance Act, 2006; West Bengal Act - Sections 33(4) and 33(5); Marwar Stamp Act, 1947; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 151

Reported in : AIR2007SC637; (SCSuppl)2007(1)CHN15; JT2006(9)SC483; (2007)1MLJ617(SC); 2006(11)SCALE159; (2006)11SCC331; 2007AIRSCW234

Matched in: Citation AIR2007SC637; (SCSuppl)2007(1)CHN15; JT2006(9)SC483; (2007)1MLJ617(SC); 2006(11)SCALE159; (2006)11SCC331; 2007AIRSCW234

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 21 2007

Neolite Polymer Industries Pvt. Ltd. a Company Incorporated Under the ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-21-2007

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Stamps Act, 1899 - Sections 2(3), 2(14), 2(15), 3, 4, 33, 35, 36, 40, 42(1) and 42(2) - Schedule - Articles 13 and 45; Bills of Exchange Act, 1882 - Sections 51, 51(1), 52, 52(3) and 57; Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 80, 104 and 134; Finance Act, 2006; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 37

Reported in : 2007(6)BomCR539; (2007)109BOMLR1930

evidence, unless such instrument is duly stamped. Clause (a) of the proviso prior to its amendment by the Finance Act of 2006 was to the following effect:(a) any such instrument not being an instrument chargeable with a duty … Article 45 of Schedule I prescribes the proper stamp duty payable in case of an instrument of partition. Section 33 provides for the impounding of the instrument not duly stamped and for examination of the instrument for ascertaining

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 30 2006

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Indian Syntans Investments (P)

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chennai

Decided on : Jun-30-2006

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2007)103ITD457(Chennai)

that there is change in law as regards the provisions of Section 148 of the Act by the Finance Act, 2006 with retrospective effect from 1st Oct., 1991 and with that change in law in the provisions of Section

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 08 2008

Jammu and Kashmir Bank Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Amritsar

Decided on : Feb-08-2008

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2008)114TTJ(Asr.)728

claim deduction on the interest earned on long-term lending to infrastructure industries. This section was deleted by the Finance Act, 2006. The provision exempted specified income by way of dividend, interest and long-term capital gains of infrastructure capital funds

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 13 2008

Larsen and Toubro Limited Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Jun-13-2008

Subject : Sales Tax/VAT

Acts : Bihar Finance Act, 1981 - Sections 2, 13, 17(2), 17(3), 19, 19(1), 19(2), 21, 21(1), 47 and 58; Central Sales Tax Act; Rajasthan Sales Tax Act - Sections 5; Bihar Sales Tax Rules, 1983 - Rules 13, 13A, 15(3) and 18; Rajasthan Sales Tax Rules - Rule 29(2); Sales Tax (Amendment) Rules, 2000 - Rule 13A; Sales Tax (Amendment) Rules, 2006 - Rule 13A

Reported in : 2008(56)BLJR2126; [2008(3)JCR698(Jhr)]; (2009)24VST233(Jharkh)

the petitioner challenging the order of re-assessment dated 5/5/2006 passed under Sections 17(3) and 19 of the Bihar Finance Act. The writ petition was dismissed by this Bench on 27/11/2006 holding that the petitioner may avail the statutory … 2007.2. The writ petition was filed by the petitioner challenging the order of re-assessment dated 5/5/2006 passed under Sections 17(3) and 19 of the Bihar Finance Act. The writ petition was dismissed by this Bench on 27/11/2006

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 25 2006

Deutsche Morgan Grenfell Group Plc (Respondents) Vs. Her Majesty's Com ...

Court : House of Lords

Decided on : Oct-25-2006

Subject : Land Acquisition

2003, this provision no longer applies to mistakes of law in tax cases: see section 320 of the Finance Act 2004.) DMG says that it did not discover its mistake until the ECJ gave judgment (after the commencement … 174 - 175 in Burrows and Rodger (Eds), Mapping the Law (Oxford 2006). 48. It has to be acknowledged, of course, that at p 382C-D … tax unlawfully demanded which was established in the Woolwich case. The other is the statutory remedy provided by section 33 of the Taxes Management Act 1973: 33.--(1) If any person who has paid tax charged under an assessment

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 08 2017

Godrej and Boyce Manufacturing Co.Ltd. Vs. Dy.Commr. of I.T.Mumbai and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-08-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

The learned Tribunal held that sub-sections (2) and (3) of Section 14A of the Act (inserted by the Finance Act, 2006 with effect from 1st April, 2007) were retrospectively applicable to the Assessment Year 2002-2003 and, therefore, the matter … in relation to earning of dividend income exempt under Section 10(33), disallowable under Section 14A of the Act?.” 33. While answering the said question this Court considered the object of insertion of Section 14A in the Income

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 07 2007

Tata MaIn Hospital Vs. the State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Sep-07-2007

Subject : Sales Tax/VAT

Acts : Bihar Finance Act, 1981 - Sections 2, 3, 7(3), 17(5) and 33; Sale of Goods Act, 1930; Government of India Act, 1935; Constitution of India - Articles 336 and 366

Reported in : [2008(2)JCR174(Jhr)]

Finance Act, 1981 for the last four financial years. (vi) To quash the demand notices dated 20th March 2006, contained in Annexure-14 series, issued by the Assistant Commissioner, Commercial Taxes, Urban Circle, Jamshedpur, under Section 17 (5) … not a transaction which comes within the meaning of 'Sale' as defined under Section 2(t) of the Bihar Finance Act, 1981 and, therefore, is not taxable under the said Act.(ii) For declaration that the petitioner does not come … were supplied to the team and, therefore, under the provision of Section 33(i) of the Act, the petitioner TMH was directed to attend the office

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 26 2013

M/S Gs1 India Vs. Director General of Income Tax (Exemption) and anr

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-26-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

the present case the period in question is both prior and subsequent to the amendments made applicable vide Finance Act 2008 with effect from 1.4.2009. Before deciding the contentions of the parties we would like to first reproduce … of Rs 20,000 and subsequent annual registration fee of Rs 4000, enhanced to Rs 5000 from financial year 2006-07 onwards. No charitable activity was involved in permitting use of intellectual property right for consideration which is nothing … passed by Director General of Income Tax (Exemptions) denying them registration under Section 10(23C)(iv) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act, for short) and for

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 21 2026

Tannia Rikhy and Others vs Sunrider India Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-21-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

been brought under the ambit of Service Tax, with effect from 01.06.2007 by virtue of implementation of the Finance Act, 2007. The Defendants, requested the Plaintiff to expedite the payment of Service Tax with immediate effect, so as … that the amount of Rs.10,50,000/-, which was given to the Defendants as interest free security deposit in August 2006, would be handed over to the Plaintiff, when they vacated the Suit Property. 14. The Plaintiff also paid … similar lines, as the defence taken by her in the Written Statement. 33. The Learned District Judge after considering the rival evidence, concluded that the … Signed By:ANIL KUMAR BHATT Signing Date:21.05.2026 17:16:57 1. Regular First Appeal under Section 96 read with Order XLI Rule 1 of the Code of Civil

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial