Advanced Search Results

Raymond Limited Vs. Raymond Pharmaceutical Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : MRTP

Wodka KG Vs. John Distilleries Ltd. 2011(4) Mh.L.J. 842 KSB Aktiengesellschaft and Anr. v. KSB Real Estate and Finance Private Ltd. in Notice of Motion No.4019 of 2007 Ford Motor Company and Anr. v. C.R.Borman and Anr. … use. 4. On or about 26.12.2005 the Plaintiffs filed Suit No.437 of 2006 in this Court ( 2006 Suit ) seeking to prevent Defendants from … Mark in their domain name and email address leading to infringement of the Mark under the provisions of Section 29(1) or 29(2) of the Trade Marks Act. The Defendants have denied all the allegations of misrepresentation, unauthorised use

Oracle India Private Limited vs.assistant Commissioner of Income Tax C ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

55,38,275. ii. A wrong claim made by the Assessee of the principal amount of Rs. 1,54,19,985 included in finance lease rentals paid during AY200304. iii. Failure of the Assessee to add back the capital expenditure in the … the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 13(1) [hereafter the ‘Assessing Officer (‘AO’)]. under Sectionof the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘Act’) seeking to re-open the assessment for Assessment Year (‘AY’) 2003-2004. W.P.(C) 7828/2010 Page 1 of 29 … of the Act by the AO by an order dated 17th February, 2006 making the following disallowances and enhancing the total taxable income to Rs. … Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 13(1) [hereafter the ‘Assessing Officer (‘AO’)]. under Sectionof the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘Act’) seeking to re-open the assessment for

The Mavilayi Service Cooperative Bank Ltd. Vs. Commissioner Of Income ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

to such deductions after the introduction of section 80P(4) of the IT Act by section 19 of the Finance Act, 2006 (21 of 2006) with effect from 01.04.2007. It may be stated at the outset that all these assessees, … the benefit members.8. To construct or let out godowns or warehouse buildings for keeping agricultural products of members. 299. Provide assistance to members for producing new types seedlings.10. Purchase and maintenance of newly innovated machines and Implements

Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. Vs. The State of Bihar

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

aforesaid judgment has been nullified by the addition of a third proviso to Section 3(2) by the Bihar Finance Act, 2006, which specifically provides that exempted goods will not be entitled to set off. For all these reasons, we … policy to give incentives to existing units to encourage additional production, the Appellant was exempted in terms of 29 the aforesaid policy from payment of sales tax on additional production for the period in question. The Entry

KSB Aktiengesellschaft and Another Vs. Anil Agarwal

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

internationally well-known trade mark with a presence in India (KSB Aktiengesellschaft and Anr. v KSB Real Estate and Finance Private Limited; Notice of Motion No.4019 of 2007 in Suit No.2930 of 2007; decided on 11th February 2008). … are in respect of the registrations in Class 7. On 4th December 2006, the Registrar of Trade Marks entered the name of the 2nd Plaintiff … is or must be deemed to be an unregistered proprietor or user at least for the purposes of Section 29(4) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 using dissimilar goods and, therefore, liable to suffer an injunction. If, on

Bharti Airtel Ltd. (Formerly Bharti Tele Ventures Ltd.) Rep. by Its He ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Sales Tax/VAT

Acts : Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 - Sections 2(15), 2(29), 3 and 39; Karnataka Value Added Tax Rules; Companies Act, 1956; Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 - Sections 4; Finance Act, 1994; Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Sections 2(7); Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 2(22) and 12; Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 2; Kerala General Saks Act 1963 - Sections 2(7); Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 39; Sales Tax Act; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 19, 19(1), 226, 246, 366(12) and 366(29A)

Reported in : (2009)22VST465(Karn); 2009(3)AIRKarR235(D.B)

It has also been registered with the 5th respondent, namely, the Commissioner of Service Tax, Bangalore under the Finance Act, 1994 and it has been regularly paying 'Service tax' in respect of the said service.(b) The Appellant Company … short) and consequent 12 notices of demand issued by him for the months of April 2005 to March 2006 demanding the tax from the appellant - company quantified thereunder. The learned Single Judge declined to interfere with … been granted license by the Government of India, Ministry of Telecommunications, under Section 4 of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 for providing 'broad hand services' … for Development of Advanced Computing, Bangalore in reply to the letter dated 29-09-2006 that was written to him by Sri G. Shivadas, the learned Advocate

G.D. Builders Vs. Uoi and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

further amendments from time to time and prior to its reenactment with effect from 18th April, 2006 vide Finance Act 2006. As on 17th April, 2006, explanation 1 of Section 67 for the purpose of removal of doubt, was … Parliament enacts a law, the exercise of legislative power of the State would be subject to a Page 29 of 51 system of levy, rates or incidence of tax. Most importantly it has been observed that measure

Cc And Ce And St Noida Vs. M/s Interarch Building Products Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service Tax

construction, erection etc. under the category "commercial or industrial constructions services" as referred under Section 65(105)(zzq) of the Finance Act, 1994 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act, 1994’). 2.2 Based on specific intelligence that the respondent had wrongly … It was mandatory for the respondent to either follow Rule 2A of Service Tax (Determination of Value) Rules, 2006 or adopt Composition Scheme. The said Rule 2A and Composition Scheme do not allow the availment of CENVAT … Notification No.12/2006 - Service Tax. Rule 2A has been inserted vide notification 29/2007 dated Civil Appeal No.11330 of 2018 Page 16 of 64 17 22.05.2007

Godrej and Boyce Mfg.Co.Ltd. Mumbai. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax,

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Income Tax

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Section 14A(1)(2)(3); Income Tax Act, 1922 - Section 8; Finance Act of 2001 - Section 14A; Finance Act 1997 - Section 10(33)

form part of the total income under the Act. Section 14A was introduced by an amendment to the Finance Act of 2001 with retrospective effect from 1 April 1962. Subsections (2) and (3) were inserted by the Finance … correctness of the claim of the assessee having regard to the accounts of the assessee.11 Circular 14 of 2006 Section 115-O :27. The submission which has been urged on behalf of the assessee is that Section 14A has … The assessee filed its return of income for Assessment Year 200203 on 29 October 2002, declaring a loss of Rs. 45.90 crores. The assessee had

Enercon (India) Ltd. and Others Vs. Enercon Gmbh and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

buttress the said submission by referring to the clauses mentioned in the IPLA, regarding the grant of licences, finance, tenure of the IPLA; iv] That the patents in respect of which the licences were to be given … The said fact is borne out by the letter dated 3rd November 2006 of the Petitioners and it is only thereafter that the Petitioners started … the IPLA and its duration. The IPLA is therefore vague, ambiguous and uncertain, and is therefore, void under Section 29 of the Indian Contract Act. The learned Senior Counsel would place reliance on the judgment of a Division