Advanced Search Results

M/s. Lakshminirman Bangalore Pvt. Ltd., Rep. by its Managing Director ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Direct Taxation

227 of Constitution of India praying to declare the newly inserted Sec.234E of the IT Act, by the Finance Act, 2012 as unconstitutional being arbitrary, discriminatory and unreasonable, the relevant extract of Section 234E is enclosed as Annexure-A. … Mr. Rashmikant Kundalia and another Vs Union of India and others (2) 2006 STC Vol.145 544 “ Jindal Stainless Ltd., and another Vs State of … provision is against the principle of audi alterum partem - no one should be condemned unheard, inasmuch as Section 272A(2)(k) was replaced by introduction of two Sections namely Section 234E and 271H and undisputedly as per repealed Section

M/S. Lakshminirman Bangalore pvt.ltd Vs. The Deputy Commissioner of In ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THE NEWLY INSERTED SEC.234E OF THE IT ACT, BY THE FINANCE ACT, 2012 AS UNCONSTITUTIONALBEING ARBITRARY, DISCRIMINATORY & UNREASONABLE. THE RELEVANT EXTRACT OF SECTION234 IS ENCLOSED AS ANNEXURE-A. 6 W.P.NOs.6918-6938/2014: … Mr.Rashmikant Kundalia and another Vs Union of India and others 76 (2) 2006 STC Vol.145 544 - Jindal Stainless Ltd., and another Vs State of … provision is against the principle of “audi alterum partem” - no one should be condemned unheard, inasmuch as Section 272A(2)(k) was replaced by introduction of two Sections namely Section 234E and 271H and undisputedly as per repealed Section

Nalini Vs. Deputy Collector

Court : Kerala

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 2(14), 139A, 192 to 196, 197, 203, 203A, 203(1), 206, 220, 271C, 272A(1), 272A(2), 272B and 272BB; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 9; Finance Act, 2004; Income Tax Rules - Rules 30, 30(1) and 31

Reported in : (2007)213CTR(Ker)601; 2006(4)KarLJ87

Matched in: Citation (2007)213CTR(Ker)601; 2006(4)KarLJ87

income Tax Officer Vs. Labh Construction and Industries

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2006)103TTJ(Ahd.)269

Matched in: Citation (2006)103TTJ(Ahd.)269

Nitin Kumar Saraf Huf Vs. Union of India Through Secretary Ministry of ...

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Land Acquisition

it has been submitted that Section 234E as well as Section 271H have been incorporated by way of Finance Act, 2012 in the Income Tax Act, 1961. There is a provision under Section 271H regarding penalty for not … tax collected. Counsels for the petitioners have submitted that prior to introduction of section 234E, there was a Section 272A which was regarding penalty for failure to answer questions, sign statements, furnish information, returns or statements, allow inspections

The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. M/S. Triumph International Finance ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

provides penalty for failure to comply with Section 269T of the Act. Section 269T has been substituted by Finance Act 2002 with effect from 1st June 2002 wherein the provision relating to repayment of deposit exceeding the prescribed … by filing a detailed reply. However, by an order dated 21st March 2006 passed under Section 271E of the Act, the assessing officer on the … section 271E, section 271F, section 271G, clause (c) or clause (d) of subsection (1) or subsection (2) of section 272A, subsection (1) of section 272AA or section 272B or subsection (1) of section 272BB or subsection (1) of