Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: finance act 2006 section 21 · Page 1 of about 4,977 results (0.091 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 13 2008

Larsen and Toubro Limited Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Jun-13-2008

Subject : Sales Tax/VAT

Acts : Bihar Finance Act, 1981 - Sections 2, 13, 17(2), 17(3), 19, 19(1), 19(2), 21, 21(1), 47 and 58; Central Sales Tax Act; Rajasthan Sales Tax Act - Sections 5; Bihar Sales Tax Rules, 1983 - Rules 13, 13A, 15(3) and 18; Rajasthan Sales Tax Rules - Rule 29(2); Sales Tax (Amendment) Rules, 2000 - Rule 13A; Sales Tax (Amendment) Rules, 2006 - Rule 13A

Reported in : 2008(56)BLJR2126; [2008(3)JCR698(Jhr)]; (2009)24VST233(Jharkh)

the petitioner challenging the order of re-assessment dated 5/5/2006 passed under Sections 17(3) and 19 of the Bihar Finance Act. The writ petition was dismissed by this Bench on 27/11/2006 holding that the petitioner may avail the statutory … of Rule 13A of the Bihar Sales Tax Rules, 1983 as amended by notification dated 01.2.2000 and also Section 21(1)(a)(1) of the Bihar Finance Act, 1981 on the ground, inter alia, that such provisions are unworkable and ultra

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 07 2009

Kmp Timbers Vs. Commercial Tax Inspector and anr.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Aug-07-2009

Subject : Sales Tax/Vat

Acts : Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 - Sections 2, 3, 3(2), 6, 19A, 21, 24, 25, 45, 47(2) and 47(16A); Tax on Entry of Goods into Local Areas Act; Income Tax Act - Sections 119; Kerala Finance Act, 2006; Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963; Central Sales Tax Act, 1956; Kerala Value Added Tax Rules, 2005 - Rules 21A, 21A(1), 21A(2) and 67(7); Constitution of India

Reported in : (2010)27VST536(Ker)

note that Section 47(16A), which was brought into effect from July 1, 2006 by virtue of the Kerala Finance Act, 2006, starts with a 'non obstante clause'. By virtue of the terminology used in the provision, paramount importance is … as defined under Section 2(lii) and also Section 6 providing for levy and the provision for self-assessment under Section 21, 'audit assessment' under Section 24 and 'assessment of the escaped turnover' under Section 25, the learned Counsel submits

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 11 2016

Mahyco Monsanto Biotech (India) Pvt. Ltd. and Others Vs. THE UNION OF ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-11-2016

Subject : Service Tax

impregnated seed is a service, and this is liable to be taxed under the relevant provisions of the Finance Act as amended, read with the Rules that pertain to service tax. This is a central levy. The transaction … India Pvt. Ltd. v State of Maharashtra, (2009) 40 MTJ 285; Second Appeal Nos. 1432 to 1438 of 2006 decided on 12th February 2009)as separate proceedings in that regard were pending. These were cases where the issue … Added Tax Act, 2002 ( the MVAT Act ); the definitions under Sections 65(105)(zzr), 65(55a) and 65(55b) of the Finance Act, 1994; and sub-clause (c) … approach of this assessing authority, to us, thus, appears to be correct. 21. The expression transfer of a right to use under Article 366(29A) of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 06 2009

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Jindal Exports Ltd. and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-06-2009

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 2(1), 2(43), 16(3), 24(2), 90, 90A, 91, 115J, 115JA, 115JA(1), 115JAA, 115JAA(1), 115JAA(2), 115JAA(4), 115JAA(5), 119, 139, 140A, 140A(1), 142, 143, 143(1), 144, 147, 148, 154, 155, 158BC, 207, 208, 209, 209(1), 210, 215(2), 234A, 234B, 234B(1), 234B(2), 234C, 234C(1), 245D(4), 245D(6), 250, 254, 260, 262, 263 and 264; Finance Act, 2006; Direct Tax Laws (Amendment) Act, 1987; Finance Act, 1997; Finance (No. 2) Act, 1996

Reported in : (2009)221CTR(Del)8; [2009]314ITR137(Delhi); [2009]179TAXMAN391(Delhi)

Section 234C(1) of the IT Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the said Act') by virtue of the Finance Act, 2006, w.e.f. 1st April, 2007. According to the learned Counsel for the appellant/Revenue, after the said amendments, there is … Section 208, fails to pay such tax or where the advance tax paid by the assessee under Section 210 is less than 90 per cent of the 'assessed tax' then such assessee shall be liable to pay

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 14 2012

M/S. Suzlon Infrastructure Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune.ii ...

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-14-2012

Subject : Service Tax

of service tax under the category of ‘Erection, Commissioning or Installation service’ as defined in Sec,65(39a) of the Finance Act, 1994, the officers of Directorate General of Central Excise Intelligence (DGCEI), New Delhi conducted investigation into the matter. … to impose penalty on it under Sec.76 for contravention of provisions of Section 68 and penalty under Section 78 of Chapter V of the Finance … judgments of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of (1) Nicco Corporation Ltd. vs. CCE, Calcutta - 2006(203)ELT 362(S.C) and (2) Skytone Electricals (India) Ltd. vs. Commissioner - 2008 (225) ELT A 97 (S.C) . 10.3 … and (ii) above, it was availing the benefit under Notification No.19/2003-ST dated 21/8/2003 which provides that in case of a contract involving erection, commissioning or

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 10 2014

Core Minerals Vs. the Commissioner of Service Tax

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-10-2014

Subject : Service Tax

Value) Rules, 2006 will come into play only in a case that falls under Section 67(1)(iii) of the Finance Act, 1994, whereas the transaction in the present case falls under Section 67(1)(i) of the Finance Act, 1994. 4.7. … Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai. Prayer in C.M.A.No.1320 of 2014: Appeal against the Final Order No.40191 of 2014, dated 21.3.2014 passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai. For Appellant : Mr.Arvind P.Datar Senior Counsel

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 19 2022

C.c. C.e. And S.t. Bangalore (adjudication) Vs. M/s Northern Operating ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-19-2022

Subject : Service Tax

Service”, “Business Auxiliary Service”, “Commercial Training and Coaching Service”, “TTSS”, “Telecommunication and Legal Consultancy Service” etc., under the Finance Act, 1994 (hereafter “the Act”). Following an audit of the records by the revenue’s officials, proceedings were initiated against … two orders4 the commissioner confirmed the proposals in the notice (except the demand for the period from April 2006 to September 2006) accepting the fact that part of the demand has been raised @ 12.3% instead of … recruitment or supply of manpower, temporarily or otherwise, ''[to any other person);]. 21 2016 (331) ELT A138(S.C.) 22 2007 (213) ELT490(S.C) 23 Substituted by the … revenue for the subsequent period. The CESTAT, by its common 1 Under Section 35L (b) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. 2 Dated 23.12.2020 in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 13 2026

M/s Mehta Export Corporation Vs Commissioner of Central Excise,Customs ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-13-2026

in Order-in-original in C.No. V/BAS/15/17/2009-ST ADJN. dated 24.12.2025 for the FY 2006-2008 passed under Section 73 of the Finance Act,1994 by the 2nd respondent and quash the same as illegal and not in accordance with law.For Petitioner(s): Mr.Sivaraman … cause notice issued on 06.08.2009 is fatal, as the transfer itself was intimated for the first time on 21.02.2025. 7.The learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance on the decision of the Division Bench of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 15 2008

Magus Construction Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors ...

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : May-15-2008

Subject : Service Tax

to the petitioner, whereby the petitioner-company has been asked to get itself registered under Section 69 of the Finance Act, 1994 (hereinafter referred to as, 'the Finance Act, 1994'), inasmuch as the petitioner-company has been, according to respondent … business of development and sale of immovable property, i.e., real estate, have impugned a notice, dated March 6, 2006 issued by respondent No. 3, namely, Superintendent of Central Excise, to the petitioner, whereby the petitioner-company has been

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 12 2021

The Mavilayi Service Cooperative Bank Ltd. Vs. Commissioner Of Income ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-12-2021

Subject : Direct Taxation

to such deductions after the introduction of section 80P(4) of the IT Act by section 19 of the Finance Act, 2006 (21 of 2006) with effect from 01.04.2007. It may be stated at the outset that all these assessees,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial