Advanced Search Results

Essar Steel Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Customs

Acts : Finance Act, 2007 - Sections 99 and 114; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 7, 12, 22, 25, 28(1), 30 and 76A to 76N; Sea Customs Act; Special Economic Zones Act, 2005 - Sections 1, 2, 2(1), 3, 3(1), 4, 4(1), 4(2), 4(4), 5, 7, 12, 15(9), 26, 26(1), 26(2), 30, 51, 53, 53(1), 53(2) and 55; Motor Vehicles Act - Sections 38 and 38(1); Taxation Act - Sections 3, 3(1) and 4A; Trade Marks Act - Sections 28; Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 3; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 4 and 4(1); Factories Act, 1948; Sea Customs (Amendment) Act, 1955; Land Customs Act; Indian Aircrafts Act, 1911; Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - Sections 2, 2(15), 2(18), 2(19), 2(20), 2(22), 2(23), 2(25), 2(26), 2(27), 12, 14, 14(1), 17, 18, 46 and 50; Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951; Income

Reported in : [2010]24STT121

Special Economic Zone were enacted by Act 20 of 2002 effective from 11-5-2002 and have been omitted vide Section 99 of the Finance Act, 2007 with effect from 11-5-2007. Section 76B as was operative during the above mentioned … permitted the goods into the zone. By virtue of Section 114(n) read with the 3rd Schedule to the Finance Act, 2007, Heading No. 11 of the Second Schedule - Export Tariff to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 was … of the Customs Act, 1962 that existed in relation to SEZ scheme, prior to the enactment of SEZ Act, 2005. Section 76F(1) provided for levy of export duty on supplies from DTA to SEZ and also provided or levy

Reserve Bank of India Vs. Jayantilal N. Mistry

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

|Information Sought |Reply | |No.| | | |1. | As mentioned at 2(a) what |Pursuant to the then Finance | | |is RBI doing about |Minister’s Budget Speech made | | |uploading the entire list |in Parliament … in these transferred cases is as to whether all the information sought for under the Right to Information Act, 2005 can be denied by the Reserve Bank of India and other Banks to the public at large on … Rules and |RBI is conducting inspections | | |Regulations of Inspection |under Section 35 of the B.R. | | |being carried out on |Act 1949

Shri Himanshu Gupta vs the Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

two lacs ten thousand six hundred twenty five), Addl. Duty of Excise leviable under Section 85 of the Finance Act, 2005 amounting to-Rs. 51,87,625/- (Fifty one lacs eighty seven thousand six hundred twenty five), National Calamity Contingent Duty leviable

Cit Vs. Dowager Maharani Residential Accommo and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2008)217CTR(Raj)497

No. 119, all ten appeals arise in exactly identical circumstances.2. Appeal Nos. 94, 99, 100, 101, 131 of 2005, and Appeal No. 1/2006 arise out of the common order of the learned ITAT dt. 10.8.2004, allowing the … to Sub-section (2) of Section 143, as it stood immediately before the amendment of said sub-section by the Finance Act, 2002 (20 of 2002) but before the expiry of the time limit for making the assessment, re-assessment or

B.S. Enterprises Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Bihar Value Added Tax Act, 2005 - Sections 14, 16, 16(1), 24, 56(2), 93, 94 and 95; Bihar Finance Act, 1981; Bihar Finance Act, 2006; Central Sales Tax Act - Sections 8(4), 13(3), 13(4) and 15; Mysore Sales Tax Act - Sections 5(4); Bihar Value Added Tax Rules - Rules 13, 56, 56(1) and 56(2); Land Ceiling Act; High Denomination Bank Notes (Demonetisation) Act, 1978; Bihar Value Added Tax Ordinance, 2005 - Sections 1(3) and 2 to 99; Mysore Sales Tax Rules - Rule 39A(2) and 39A(3); Bihar Sales Tax Rules, 1983 - Rule 35; Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules - Rules 7(3) and 9; Central Sales Tax (Kerala) Rules - Rule 6(1)

Matched in: Advocate S.D. Sanjay and Suraj Samdarshi, Advs. in C.W.J.C. No. 14725/05, Ramesh Kumar Agrawal, Anupanand Jha and Gopi Krishna, Advs. in C.W.J.C. Nos. 12390 & 12397 of 2005 and Prakash Sahay, Adv. in C.W.J.C. P.K. Shahi, Adv. General, Rai Shivaji Nath, A.A.G., Raj Nandan Prasad, Vikash Kumar and Purnendu Singh, Advs.

M/S T T K Prestige Ltd Vs. The Union of India Reptd by Its Finance Sec ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : MRTP

PRAYING TO STRIKE DOWN THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER XII-H INSERTED IN THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 BY THE FINANCE ACT, 2005 WITH EFFECT FROM14.2005 AS OFFENDING THE PROVISIONS OF ARTICLE14OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA AND AS BEING BEYOND THE … CGC FOR R1 & R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE SECTION115WA TO WL OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 AS INTRODUCED BY THE FINANCE ACT, 2005 WITH EFFECT FROM14.2006

Brahm Datt vs.assistant Commissioner of Income -Tax & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

end of the relevant assessment year.5. The petitioner next refers to the amendment to Section 149 by the Finance Act, 2001, with effect from 01.06.2001 further reducing the time for limitation to six years. Provisions of the said

M/S. Mangalore Refinery and Petrochemicals Limited Vs. the Commissione ...

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Subject : Customs

Ramanan contested the challenge to jurisdiction relying on the decision of the Tribunal in the case of Sundaram Finance vs. Commissioner of Customs reported in 2012 (279) E.L.T. 220 (Tri.-Chennai) and the decision of the Tribunal in … of the Tribunal in Jay Ushin Ltd. v. CC (Import), Chennai - 2005 (181) E.L.T. 120 (Tri. - Del.), following the Larger Bench decision in … by the department against the same order seeking enhancement of penalty imposed under Section 114A of the Customs Act equivalent to the ‘duty demanded plus the corresponding interest accrued under Section 28AB of the said Act’ instead

J.B. Chemicals and Vs. Addl. Cit

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

1-4-1999 as under: Held, (i) that Section 145A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, was introduced by the Finance (No. 2) Bill, 1998. Originally, the Bill contemplated the proposed amendment to apply from 1-4-1986, in relation to … be 80%, for 2002-03 it would be 60% and so on and no deduction for the assessment year 2005-06 and any subsequent year.9. In the above formula export turnover is fixed as the one for which foreign

Bhilwara Spinners Ltd Vs. Commissioner of Customs (Export), Mumbai.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

Tariff Act, whereunder SAD was levied during the period of dispute, was omitted from the statute under the Finance Act, 2005 without any saving clause and therefore, at this stage, no SAD is recoverable from the appellant. 15. We … Air Cargo Complex, Mumbai) confirmed the demands of duty against the assessee, ordered confiscation of the goods under Section 111 (o) of the Customs Act, imposed redemption fines in lieu of such confiscation under Section 125 of