Advanced Search Results
Bharuch Jilla Adarsh Samaj Seva Mandal Vs. Veer Narmad South Gujarat U ...
Gujarat
Jun-06-2006
Constitution
South Gujarat University Act, 1965 - Sections 14(6) and 34; National Council of Teachers Education Act, 1993; Maharashtra University Act - Sections 82 and 83; National Council for Teacher Education Rules, 2005; Constitution of India - Article 226; National Council for Teacher Education (Form of application for recognition, the time limit for submission of application, determination of norms and standards for recognition of teacher education, programmes and permission to start new course or training) Regulations, 1995 - Regulations 7(11) and 7(12); National Council for Teacher Education (Form of application for recognition, the time limit for submission of application, determination of norms and standards for recognition of teacher education, programmes and permission to start new cou
(2006)3GLR2037
the NCTE for granting approval/recognition to start a new Self-Financed B.Ed. College at Mangrol from the Academic Year 2005-2006, and the NCTE, by order dated 25th February 2005, granted approval/recognition to the petitioner Trust to start a … NCTE under Section 14(6) of the Act, every University is obliged to grant affiliation to such Institution and Section 82 and 83 of the Maharashtra University Act (as applicable in that case) would not apply to such case
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskV.B. Information Systems Vs. Cce
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Jun-15-2005
Service Tax
(2005)(102)ECC522
Matched in: Citation (2005)(102)ECC522
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPuissance De Dpk Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Chennai
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai
Apr-29-2010
Excise
Rule 57AH read with Rule 57AD of Central Excise Rules, 1944 as amended by Section 82 of the Finance Act, 2005 and Rule 12 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2001 read with Rule 6 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2001
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Cce, Madurai Vs. M/S. Sundaram Fasteners Ltd.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai
Apr-21-2014
Excise
in the Act or Rules for its recovery. The learned AR submits that by Section 82 of the Finance Act, 2005, there is retrospective amendment for Rule 57CC insofar as if the manufacturer fails to pay the amount, it
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChitra Construction Company Vs. Addl Commissioner of Customs
Chennai
Jan-04-2013
Land Acquisition
Valley, Green Home, Onampalayam, Coimbator”109. culminating in Mahazar dated 1.3.2012 as being ultra vires Section 82 of the Finance Act, apart from being in excess of jurisdiction and unconstitutional. W.P.No.22902 of 2012: Writ Petition filed under Article 226
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTotal Network Sl (a Company Incorporated in Spain) (Original Responden ...
House of Lords
Mar-12-2008
Service Tax
this form of sales tax throughout all the member states of the EU: see Part I of the Finance Act 1972, which brought the then Directives into force in the UK following its accession to the EEC. It … due to the Crown. These provisions must now be read together with the Commissioners for Revenue and Customs Act 2005, which provides for the appointment of the Commissioners to exercise the functions previously vested in the Commissioners of … with “the duty of collecting and accounting for, and otherwise managing, the revenues of customs and excise". (In 2005, section 6 of the 1979 Act was repealed by the Commissioners for Revenue and Customs Act 2005 (“the 2005 … disclosed to them. 19. Mention should also be made of the provision which VATA 1994 makes for appeals. Section 82(1) provides that a reference to a tribunal is a reference to a tribunal constituted in accordance with Schedule
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Rajasthan Vs. Uka and ors.,
Rajasthan
May-10-2010
Tenancy
was entered in the name of purchaser. The Tehsildar, Raniwada moved a reference application as per provisions of Section 82 of the Rajasthan Land Revenue Act, 1956 to the Collector, Jalore on the ground that the sale aforesaid … shown that there are certain provisions therein which inhibit the entry of commercial Banks into the field of financing of agriculture. It will, therefore, be necessary to modify these laws for the purpose of enabling commercial banks
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. Vs. State of Bihar and ors.
Patna
Oct-11-2006
Sales Tax
Bihar Finance Act, 1981 - Sections 25; Value Added Tax Act, 2005 - Sections 39 and 41(1)
Taxes, Patliputra Circle, Patna, imposed on it the penalty of Rs. 3,50,37,414.82 under Section 25(ka) of the Bihar Finance Act, 1981 and Section 41(1) of the Value Added Tax Act, 2005. He gave a notice to the petitioner
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNational Joint Committee for Steel Industry vs R.K. Mishra and Anr.
Delhi
May-13-2026
Right to Information
of orders dated 24.12.2012 and 29.01.2016passed by the Central Information Commission (hereinafter “CIC”) under the Right to Information Act, 2005 (hereinafter “RTI Act, 2005”), relating to disclosure of information concerning the National Joint Committee for Steel Industry (hereinafter … can be no fiduciary relationship between NJCS and the very(2013 16 SCC 82 16:10:21 6 KUMAR KAURAVemployees whose service conditions and wages are determined through … Cooperative Bank Ltd. v. State of Kerala1 to contend that burden to establish that a body is substantially financed16:10:21 5 KUMAR KAURAV or controlled by the Government lies upon the applicant seeking information.12. Per contra, learned counsel … has been held to be a “public authority” within the meaning of Section 2(h) of the RTI, Act 2005.3. W.P.(C) 6512/2016 has been preferred by
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSteel Authority of India Ltd vs Sh.R.K.Mishra
Delhi
May-13-2026
Right to Information
of orders dated 24.12.2012 and 29.01.2016passed by the Central Information Commission (hereinafter “CIC”) under the Right to Information Act, 2005 (hereinafter “RTI Act, 2005”), relating to disclosure of information concerning the National Joint Committee for Steel Industry (hereinafter … can be no fiduciary relationship between NJCS and the very(2013 16 SCC 82 16:10:21 6 KUMAR KAURAVemployees whose service conditions and wages are determined through … Cooperative Bank Ltd. v. State of Kerala1 to contend that burden to establish that a body is substantially financed16:10:21 5 KUMAR KAURAV or controlled by the Government lies upon the applicant seeking information.12. Per contra, learned counsel … has been held to be a “public authority” within the meaning of Section 2(h) of the RTI, Act 2005.3. W.P.(C) 6512/2016 has been preferred by
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »