Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: finance act 2005 section 62 · Page 1 of about 1,643 results (0.061 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 21 2006

Sri V.G. Ramachandiron Vs. Income-tax Officer [Alongwith

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chennai

Decided on : Feb-21-2006

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2006)284ITR53(Chennai)

either. It is pertinent to mention here that even while Clause (10C) has since been amended by the Finance Act, 2003, so as to make it applicable not only to any amount "received" but also to any amount … 2003 dated 5th September 2003, Clause '9' as reported in 263 ITR 62 (St.) page 72, which reads as under: Exemption of amount received under … called as VRS) subject to a limit of Rs. 5,00,000/- are exempt from being charged to tax under Section 10(10C) of the I.T. Act, 1961, even, if the payment is made in instalments and the same are

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 26 2006

Siel Limited Vs. the Punjab State Electricity

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Decided on : May-26-2006

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : (2006)LCAPTEL931

appeals. Appeal Nos. 4, 13, 14, 23, 25, 26 and 35 of 2005 have been filed either by the Power Intensive Industrial Consumers or their … them framing of the Tariff Regulations is a condition precedent for exercise of power by the Commission under Section 62 of the Act of 2003 for determination of Tariff. It was submitted that since Regulations were not framed … come out with Financial Restructuring Plan for the Board. (vi) Most of the State Governments have restructured the finances of the Boards for fixation of a fair Tariff and giving relief to the consumers, but the State

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 19 2022

C.c. C.e. And S.t. Bangalore (adjudication) Vs. M/s Northern Operating ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-19-2022

Subject : Service Tax

otherwise, ''[to any other person);]. 21 2016 (331) ELT A138(S.C.) 22 2007 (213) ELT490(S.C) 23 Substituted by the Finance Act, 2005, w.e.f. 16.06.2005. 16 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx (105) “taxable service” means any service provided 24[or to be provided].,- xxxxxx … show cause notices were issued). Invocation of the extended period of limitation 62. The revenue’s argument that the assessee had indulged in wilful suppression, in … order, discharging proceedings initiated by the revenue for the subsequent period. The CESTAT, by its common 1 Under Section 35L (b) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. 2 Dated 23.12.2020 in Service Tax Appeal (STA) Nos. 22573-74/2014;

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 16 2006

P.V.V. Prasad and ors. Vs. Government of A.P. and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-16-2006

Subject : Civil

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 - Sections 3, 3(2), 6, 246(1), 250, 256, 268 and 268(1); Andhra Pradesh Gram Panchayat Act, 1994; Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation Act, 1979 - Sections 3, 3(1), 9(2) and 679(D); Andhra Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1965 - Sections 3(1), 62 and 62A; Constitution of India (73rd and 74th Amendment) Act; Andhra Pradesh Gram Panchayat Act, 1964 - Sections 250 and 264; Andhra Pradesh General Clause Act, 1891 - Sections 15; Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1965 - Sections 341; Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 - Sections 3(2) and 3(3); Himachal Pradesh Municipal Act, 1968 - Sections 256; Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1965 - Sections 341; Cons

Reported in : 2006(2)ALD797; 2006(2)ALT503

Matched in: Advocate K.R. Pmbhakar, Adv. in WP No. 25147 of 2005 and ;D. Prasama Kumari, Adv. in WP Nos. 25771 and 25772 of 2005 Government Pleader for GAD and Home in WP No. 25147 of 2005 and ;Government Pleader for Municipal and Administration in WP Nos. 25771 and 25772 of 2005

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 24 2012

M/S.Tata Sky Ltd. Rep. Through Its M.D. and Ceo, S Vs. State of Orissa ...

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Apr-24-2012

Subject : Service Tax

DTH services were brought within the purview of service tax with effect from 16th June, 2005 by the Finance Act, 2005. Under Section 65 (105) (zk) of the Finance Act, as amended, DTH service is covered under the category … and ultra vires Articles 246, 265, 301 & 19(1)(g) read with Entry 92C/97 of List I and Entry 62 of List II, Seventh Schedule of the Constitution of India, to the extent entertainment tax is sought to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 25 2011

M/S. Bharti Airtel Ltd., Rep by Its Head-legal and Regulatory, S. Naga ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-25-2011

Subject : Service Tax

Matched in: Parties M/S. Bharti Airtel Ltd., Rep by Its Head-legal and Regulatory, S. Nagaraj Vs. the State of Karnataka Finance Department, Rep by Its Secretary to the Government and Others

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 03 2019

State of West Bengal Vs. Calcutta Club Limited

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-03-2019

Subject : Service Tax

in life insurance under the life insurance service, whereas this service was introduced in the year 2002. The Finance Act, 2005 brought 9 new services under the service tax net. The Finance Act, 2006 brought 15 new services under … argued that the doctrine of mutuality, insofar as incorporated institutions are concerned, 62 was not done away with in the service tax regime, and the … therefore, no sales tax could be levied.4. The Tribunal referred to Article 366(29-A) of the Constitution of India, Section 2(30) of the Act, its earlier decision in Hindustan Club Ltd. v. CCT [Hindustan Club Ltd. v. CCT,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 18 2016

M/s. D.P. Jain and Company Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-18-2016

Subject : Service Tax

Matched in: Parties M/s. D.P. Jain and Company Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue and Another

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 06 2004

Mahesh Niranjan Jute Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-06-2004

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Commercial Tax Act, 1994 - Sections 32, 61, 62(7), 71 and 72; Constitution of India - Article 226 and 227

Reported in : [2006]146STC294(MP)

and bottling of liquor whether amounts to manufacture within meaning of Section 2(f) of Central Excise Act 1944? Finance Act 932 of 1994), Section 65 (76 b) (as amended on 16.6.2005) - Held, The first limb of the … petitioner seeks to challenge the order, dated February 28, 2004 (annexure P 11), passed by State Under Section 62(7) of the Madhya Pradesh Commercial Tax Act, 1994 (for short called 'the Act'). Facts of the case are

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 04 2022

Maa Sharda Tobacco Private Limited Vs. Union Of India

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-04-2022

Subject : Land Acquisition

rates specified in the schedule is levied. By virtue of the amendment of the Twelfth Schedule of the Finance Act, 2005 the rates stand amended. The surcharge would merely refer to an increase of the duty which in the … substance” actually a tax on luxuries which was squarely covered by Entry 62 List II or it could be construed as a tax on consideration … quash the Notification No.3 of 2019 dated 06.07.2019 issued by the first respondent, purporting to exercise power under Section 5 (A) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, levying Central Excise on tobacco and tobacco products vide Annexure-‘A’

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial