Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: finance act 2005 section 61 · Page 1 of about 1,357 results (0.055 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 20 2008

Commissioner of C. Ex. Vs. United Plastomers

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-20-2008

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2008)217CTR(P& H)129; 2008[10]STR229; [2007]13STT67; (2009)19VST382(P& H)

and public relations servicesand includes services as a commission agent, but does not include any information technology service.Vide Finance Act, 2005 the definition of Business Auxiliary Service has been amended and reads as under:Business Auxiliary Service' means any service … ORDERRakesh Kumar Garg, J.1. The revenue has filed the present appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 challenging the order dated 20-6-2005 passed by the Customs Excise and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 27 2005

State of Kerala Vs. George Jacob

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Oct-27-2005

Subject : Civil

Acts : Kerala Finance Act, 2005; ;Kerala Stamp Act, 1959 - Sections 2, 2(12), 3, 9, 17, 27, 33, 35, 40, 60 and 64 ;Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 23, 25, 31, 32, 35, 47, 49, 61, 74, 88 and 89; ;Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 53A, 54 and 59; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 64 - Order 38, Rule 10; ;Transfer of Property (Amendment) Supplementary Act, 1929 - Sections 10; ;Theft Act, 1968 - Sections 20(2); ;Indian Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 2(14) and 2(17); ;Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 175(3)

Reported in : AIR2006Ker111; 2005(4)KLT709

Matched in: Citation AIR2006Ker111; 2005(4)KLT709

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 18 2016

M/s. D.P. Jain and Company Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-18-2016

Subject : Service Tax

tax amounting to Rs.10,25,72,125/- should not be demanded from it under the provisions of section 73(1) of the Finance Act, 1994. Interest under section 75 was proposed to be recovered and penalties under sections 76, 77 and 78 … That was on the prima facie view as reflected from that order. 61. This order on the stay application was challenged before this court in … runways; (iii) site formation activity undertaken at roads. The dispute in the present case pertains to period from 2005-06 to 2009-10. 7. In the month of July, 2010, investigations were conducted by the officers of Service Tax

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Oct 08 2004

Milan Supari Stores Vs. Commissioner of Commercial Tax and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-08-2004

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Commercial Tax Act, 1994 - Sections 27, 27(8) and 27(9); Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958 - Sections 18(8), 19(1), 29D, 44(1) and 52; Central Sales Tax Act, 1956; Madhya Pradesh Entry Tax Act, 1976; Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Rules, 1959 - Rule 63; Madhya Pradesh Commercial Tax Rules, 1995 - Rule 86

Reported in : 2005(1)MPLJ98; [2006]146STC360(MP)

Matched in: Citation 2005(1)MPLJ98; [2006]146STC360(MP)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 20 2013

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Thiru Arooran Sugars Limited

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-20-2013

Subject : Service Tax

operators and the recovery of Service Tax has been authorised (Validated) in terms of provisions contained in the Finance Act, 2003 and the said Tax is recoverable from such person which recovery is only under the authority of … Judicature at Madras Dated:20. 06.2013 Coram The Honourable Mrs.JUSTICE CHITRA VENKATARAMAN and The Honourable Ms.JUSTICE K.B.K.VASUKI C.M.A.No.1451 of 2005 The Commissioner of Central Excise Central Excise Commissionerate No.1, Williams Road Tiruchirapalli 620 001 .. Appellant Vs. M/s. … Thirumandankudi Papanasam Taluk Tamil Nadu .. Respondent Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 35 G of Central Excise Act, 1944 against the final order No.844/2004

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 26 2006

Siel Limited Vs. the Punjab State Electricity

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Decided on : May-26-2006

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : (2006)LCAPTEL931

the Tariff for the financial year, 2005-06 has been determined by the PSERC without framing Tariff Regulations under Section 61 of the Act of 2003 and is, therefore, bad in law. According to them framing of the Tariff … come out with Financial Restructuring Plan for the Board. (vi) Most of the State Governments have restructured the finances of the Boards for fixation of a fair Tariff and giving relief to the consumers, but the State

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 07 2006

Chhattisgarh Biomass Energy Vs. Chhattisgarh State Electricity

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Decided on : Sep-07-2006

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2006)LCAPTEL711

Appeal No. 20/2006 is directed against the Tariff Order dated 11^th November, 2005 passed by Chhattisgarh State Electricity Regulatory Commission (Commission for brevity) in Petition … "green" power sources of energy and are to be promoted as per the preamble to the Act. (b) Section 61 of the Act which specify the guiding factors to be considered for framing terms and conditions for the … State at a uniform wheeling charge of 2 per cent of the energy fed to the grid. (d) Financing of Non-conventional power plant with capital subsidy through the Government of India's owned Indian Renewable Energy Development Agency

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 26 2014

Bangalore Turf Club Limited Vs. Union of India

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-26-2014

Subject : Education

Minister made a speech on the Floor of Parliament making it explicitly clear and indicating thereunder that by Finance Act , 1986 Section115BB has been inserted to provide gross winnings from lotteries, crossword puzzles, races including horse races … in the case of STATE OF H.P & OTHERS vs GUJARAT AMBUJA CEMENT LTD & ANOTHER -STC VOL142 2005[ (2005) 6 SCC499. It came to be held as under: “17. Stand of the respondents on the other … 3.4. Mr.S.Padmanabhan 5. Mr.Z.Darashah, 6. Mr.S.Inayathulla, S/o late S Hajee, Aged about 61 years Residing at No.41, Linden Street, Austin Town, Bangalore-560 045 7. Mr.B.Prithviraj, … of the Income Tax Act and consequently hold that the provisions of section 194B are not applicable to the petitioners. W.P.NO.6674/2013 BETWEEN: M/s Mysore Race

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 03 2019

State of West Bengal Vs. Calcutta Club Limited

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-03-2019

Subject : Service Tax

in life insurance under the life insurance service, whereas this service was introduced in the year 2002. The Finance Act, 2005 brought 9 new services under the service tax net. The Finance Act, 2006 brought 15 new services under … therefore, no sales tax could be levied.4. The Tribunal referred to Article 366(29-A) of the Constitution of India, Section 2(30) of the Act, its earlier decision in Hindustan Club Ltd. v. CCT [Hindustan Club Ltd. v. CCT, … liable to pay tax under sub-section (2) or sub-section (5).” 9. The 61st Law Commission Report, which deliberated on the subject matter of Article 366(29-A),

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 25 2014

Ripusudan Dayal and ors. Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-25-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

their powers by getting the works carried out without making budgetary provisions and without getting approval from the Finance Department in respect of the works specified at item numbers (iv), (vi), (vii) and (viii) above. (c) Following … the concerned department. The said complaint was registered as E.R. No.127 of 2005. During the inquiry, the Deputy Secretary, Housing and Environment Department, vide letter … Lokayukt of the State of Madhya Pradesh appointed under the provisions of the Madhya Pradesh Lokayukt Evam Uplokayukt Act, 1981 (hereinafter referred to as “the Lokayukt Act”). Petitioner No.2 was the Legal Advisor, a member of the … has power to investigate the offences notified by the State Government under Section 3 of the said Act, which reads as under:- “3. Offences to … a Government Company within the meaning of Section 617 of the Companies Act, 1956; or (ii) a

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial