Advanced Search Results

Kaveripet and Polyforms Pvt.Ltd. Vs. the Commissioner Tax Foficer, and ...

Court : Kerala

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Finance Act, 2005 - section 6(7); Kerala Tax on Entry of Goods Into Local Areas Act, 1994

The petitioner has approached this Court with the following prayers: (i) Declare section 6 (7) (d) of the Finance Act 2005 by which "machineries" are included as item No. 62 to the schedule to the Kerala Tax on Entry

Great Galleon Limited and ors. Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 2009(3)MPHT356

manufacturing activity and is not covered by 'packaging activity' as defined in Section 65 (76 g) of the Finance Act, 2005 read with definition of 'taxable service' in Section 65 (105) (zzzf) of the Service Tax Act.(2) Whether the … separate activity, but part of manufacturing activity and is not covered by 'packaging activity' as defined in Section 65 (76 g) of the Finance Act, 2005 read with definition of 'taxable service' in Section 65 (105) (zzzf)

Tata Steel Ltd. and ors. Vs. the State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Bihar Finance Act, 1981 - Sections 7, 7(2), 7(3), 22, 46 and 46(4); Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 8(5); Jharkhand Value Added Tax Act, 2005 - Sections 15, 16, 17, 18, 95, 95(3) and 96(3); Bihar Sales Tax Act, 1981; Bihar Reorganization Act, 2000 - Sections 84 and 85; Orissa Sales Tax Act - Sections 6; State General Sales Tax Act; General Clauses Act - Sections 21; Central Sales Tax (Bihar) Rules, 1956; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 299, 301 and 304

Reported in : 2007(2)BLJR1153; [2007(2)JCR180(Jhr)]; (2007)7VST109(Jharkh)

challenge is made to Notification No. S.O.201 dated 30th March, 2006, issued under Section 7(3)(b) of' the Bihar Finance Act, 1981, whereby and whereunder, Notification Nos. S.O.478 dated 22nd December, 1995, S.O.57 dated 2nd March, 2000, S.O.479 dated … notifications, constitutional validity of the provisions of Section 95(3)(ii) and Section 96(3) of the Jharkhand Value Added Tax Act, 2005 is also questioned. In view of the commonality of the grounds of challenge, all these writ petitions were … therein. It also provided for issuance of statutory notifications under the Orissa Sales Tax Act for granting exemption. Section 6 of the Orissa Sales Tax Act provided for issuance of exemption notifications. It further laid down that the

Geo Sea Foods Vs. Addl. Sales Tax Officer

Court : Kerala

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963; Kerala Finance Act, 1993 - Sections 17 and 17(6); Kerala Finance Act, 2000 - Sections 17, 17A and 18; Kerala General Sales Tax (Amendment) Act, 2005; Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963

Reported in : 2006(1)KLT72; [2006]144STC553(Ker)

an assessment. The assessments were to be completed within a reasonable time. For the first time, the Kerala Finance Act, 1993 introduced an amendment to Section 17 prescribing a period of 4 years. In the case of assessments … are to be deemed pending. The above provision has been deleted by the Kerala General Sales Tax (Amendment) Act, 2005 since the provision became obsolete and the object sought to be achieved by the amendment served its purpose. … period. The relevance of four years in the proviso is that Sub-section 6 has provided that 'Any assessment under this section shall be completed within

K.M.Suprabha,Principal vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

the appellants are not entitled to get any relief being a public authority under the Right to information Act 2005 and liable to provide information in terms of the provisions of the Act, 2005.2. The common judgement of … this Court and before the ApexCourt. However, the Apex Court found that section 2(h) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 deals with six different … appeals W.A.NO.1990 OF 2007 & con.cases. 15 in order to identify as to whether the institutions are substantially financed by the State Government or not since there was no evidence available before the court. It is accordingly … MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY WEDNESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2020 / 6TH KARTHIKA, 1942 WA.No.1990 OF 2007 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WPC 13714/2007 DATED

Dr.G.Mohan Sreekumar,Principal vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

the appellants are not entitled to get any relief being a public authority under the Right to information Act 2005 and liable to provide information in terms of the provisions of the Act, 2005.2. The common judgement of … this Court and before the ApexCourt. However, the Apex Court found that section 2(h) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 deals with six different … appeals W.A.NO.1990 OF 2007 & con.cases. 15 in order to identify as to whether the institutions are substantially financed by the State Government or not since there was no evidence available before the court. It is accordingly … MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY WEDNESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2020 / 6TH KARTHIKA, 1942 WA.No.1990 OF 2007 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WPC 13714/2007 DATED

Dr.Jeevan Lal,Principal vs State of Kerala & Others

Court : Kerala

the appellants are not entitled to get any relief being a public authority under the Right to information Act 2005 and liable to provide information in terms of the provisions of the Act, 2005.2. The common judgement of … this Court and before the ApexCourt. However, the Apex Court found that section 2(h) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 deals with six different … appeals W.A.NO.1990 OF 2007 & con.cases. 15 in order to identify as to whether the institutions are substantially financed by the State Government or not since there was no evidence available before the court. It is accordingly … MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY WEDNESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2020 / 6TH KARTHIKA, 1942 WA.No.1990 OF 2007 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WPC 13714/2007 DATED

Dr. N.Viswarajan, Principal vs State of Kerala & Others

Court : Kerala

the appellants are not entitled to get any relief being a public authority under the Right to information Act 2005 and liable to provide information in terms of the provisions of the Act, 2005.2. The common judgement of … this Court and before the ApexCourt. However, the Apex Court found that section 2(h) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 deals with six different … appeals W.A.NO.1990 OF 2007 & con.cases. 15 in order to identify as to whether the institutions are substantially financed by the State Government or not since there was no evidence available before the court. It is accordingly … MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY WEDNESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2020 / 6TH KARTHIKA, 1942 WA.No.1990 OF 2007 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WPC 13714/2007 DATED

Dr.S.V.Sudheer,Principal vs State of Kerala & Others

Court : Kerala

the appellants are not entitled to get any relief being a public authority under the Right to information Act 2005 and liable to provide information in terms of the provisions of the Act, 2005.2. The common judgement of … this Court and before the ApexCourt. However, the Apex Court found that section 2(h) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 deals with six different … appeals W.A.NO.1990 OF 2007 & con.cases. 15 in order to identify as to whether the institutions are substantially financed by the State Government or not since there was no evidence available before the court. It is accordingly … MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY WEDNESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2020 / 6TH KARTHIKA, 1942 WA.No.1990 OF 2007 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WPC 13714/2007 DATED

Dr. Suma Narayan, Principal vs State of Kerala & Others

Court : Kerala

the appellants are not entitled to get any relief being a public authority under the Right to information Act 2005 and liable to provide information in terms of the provisions of the Act, 2005.2. The common judgement of … this Court and before the ApexCourt. However, the Apex Court found that section 2(h) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 deals with six different … appeals W.A.NO.1990 OF 2007 & con.cases. 15 in order to identify as to whether the institutions are substantially financed by the State Government or not since there was no evidence available before the court. It is accordingly … MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY WEDNESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2020 / 6TH KARTHIKA, 1942 WA.No.1990 OF 2007 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WPC 13714/2007 DATED