Advanced Search Results

All Kerala Document Writers and Scribes Association Vs. State of Keral ...

Court : Kerala

Subject : Civil

Acts : Kerala Finance Act, 2005; Kerala Stamp Act, 1959 - Sections 2 and 17; Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 23, 24, 25, 26 and 45B; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 54

Reported in : 2005(3)KLT234

Matched in: Citation 2005(3)KLT234

George Jacob and ors. Vs. State of Kerala and anr.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Civil

Acts : Kerala Finance Act, 2005; Kerala Stamp Act, 1959 - Sections 2 and 17; Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 17, 23 and 45B; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 54

Reported in : AIR2005Ker298

Association. The brief facts necessary for the disposal of the writ petitions are the following :2. The Kerala Finance Act, 2005 (Act 10 of 2005) amended the schedule to the Kerala Stamp Act, providing for higher rate of stamp … property, the value of which is Rs. 100/- or above, has to be compulsorily registered in view of Section 54 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, it is pointed out. Therefore, they submit that the execution of

State of Kerala Vs. George Jacob

Court : Kerala

Subject : Civil

Acts : Kerala Finance Act, 2005; ;Kerala Stamp Act, 1959 - Sections 2, 2(12), 3, 9, 17, 27, 33, 35, 40, 60 and 64 ;Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 23, 25, 31, 32, 35, 47, 49, 61, 74, 88 and 89; ;Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 53A, 54 and 59; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 64 - Order 38, Rule 10; ;Transfer of Property (Amendment) Supplementary Act, 1929 - Sections 10; ;Theft Act, 1968 - Sections 20(2); ;Indian Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 2(14) and 2(17); ;Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 175(3)

Reported in : AIR2006Ker111; 2005(4)KLT709

Matched in: Citation AIR2006Ker111; 2005(4)KLT709

Yfc Projects P.Ltd. Vs. Uoi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

the Finance (No.2) Act, 2004, w.e.f. 10.09.2004, to include the erection services within its ambit, again by the Finance Act, 2005, w.e.f. 16.06.2005, to include specific installation services and again by the Finance Act, 2006, w.e.f. 01.05.2006 to include … from the prayer in M/s YFC Projects Pvt. Ltd., challenges have been raised to the constitutional validity of Section 65(105) (zzd), Section 65 (105) (zzq) and Section 65 (105) (zzzh) of the Finance Act, 1994. The prayers … insofar as the sale/supply of materials is concerned, they fall under Entry 54 of List II of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution of India

Vistar Constructions (P) Ltd Vs. Uoi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

the Finance (No.2) Act, 2004, w.e.f. 10.09.2004, to include the erection services within its ambit, again by the Finance Act, 2005, w.e.f. 16.06.2005, to include specific installation services and again by the Finance Act, 2006, w.e.f. 01.05.2006 to include … from the prayer in M/s YFC Projects Pvt. Ltd., challenges have been raised to the constitutional validity of Section 65(105) (zzd), Section 65 (105) (zzq) and Section 65 (105) (zzzh) of the Finance Act, 1994. The prayers … insofar as the sale/supply of materials is concerned, they fall under Entry 54 of List II of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution of India

Skyline Engineering Contracts (India)(P) Ltd Vs. Uoi and ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

the Finance (No.2) Act, 2004, w.e.f. 10.09.2004, to include the erection services within its ambit, again by the Finance Act, 2005, w.e.f. 16.06.2005, to include specific installation services and again by the Finance Act, 2006, w.e.f. 01.05.2006 to include … from the prayer in M/s YFC Projects Pvt. Ltd., challenges have been raised to the constitutional validity of Section 65(105) (zzd), Section 65 (105) (zzq) and Section 65 (105) (zzzh) of the Finance Act, 1994. The prayers … insofar as the sale/supply of materials is concerned, they fall under Entry 54 of List II of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution of India

G.D.Buildtech P.Ltd. Vs. Uoi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

the Finance (No.2) Act, 2004, w.e.f. 10.09.2004, to include the erection services within its ambit, again by the Finance Act, 2005, w.e.f. 16.06.2005, to include specific installation services and again by the Finance Act, 2006, w.e.f. 01.05.2006 to include … from the prayer in M/s YFC Projects Pvt. Ltd., challenges have been raised to the constitutional validity of Section 65(105) (zzd), Section 65 (105) (zzq) and Section 65 (105) (zzzh) of the Finance Act, 1994. The prayers … insofar as the sale/supply of materials is concerned, they fall under Entry 54 of List II of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution of India

Thrishul Zarda Pouches Vs. Union Of India

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

rates specified in the schedule is levied. By virtue of the amendment of the Twelfth Schedule of the Finance Act, 2005 the rates stand amended. The surcharge would merely refer to an increase of the duty which in the … policy matters on fiscal issues. We are therefore unable to accept the challenge to the constitutional validity of Section 54 (3)15. In the above factual matrix, keeping in mind the guideline laid down by the Supreme Court, no

Harsh International Flavour Vs. Union Of India

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

rates specified in the schedule is levied. By virtue of the amendment of the Twelfth Schedule of the Finance Act, 2005 the rates stand amended. The surcharge would merely refer to an increase of the duty which in the … policy matters on fiscal issues. We are therefore unable to accept the challenge to the constitutional validity of Section 54 (3)15. In the above factual matrix, keeping in mind the guideline laid down by the Supreme Court, no

Jalaram Industries Vs. Union Of India

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

rates specified in the schedule is levied. By virtue of the amendment of the Twelfth Schedule of the Finance Act, 2005 the rates stand amended. The surcharge would merely refer to an increase of the duty which in the … policy matters on fiscal issues. We are therefore unable to accept the challenge to the constitutional validity of Section 54 (3)15. In the above factual matrix, keeping in mind the guideline laid down by the Supreme Court, no