Advanced Search Results

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

referred to. This Appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 r/w Section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994 challenges the order passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (for short “CESTAT”) dated … of ‘Service Provided from India contained in first leg of Rule 3(2)(a) of the Export of Service Rules, 2005. (b) Whether the CESTAT erred in not considering the alternative plea of the Appellants, that in the event … is liable to be refunded treating the claim already made under Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 as claim for refund under Section 11B

Hotel Asoka Vs. the Commercial Tax Officer-1, Dept of Comml. Taxes

Court : Kerala

Subject : Sales Tax/VAT

Acts : Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 - Sections 1(2), 3, 5B, 5(2), 6(2), 7 and 30; Kerala Finance Act, 2006 - Sections 2(1); KVAT Act, 2003 - Sections 8; Kerala General Sales Tax (Amendment) Act, 2005; Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 17 and 17(6); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 19(1), 226 and 265; Kerala General Sales Tax Rules - Rule 30

Reported in : 2008(1)KLJ419; (2009)25VST546(Ker)

at 10% on the sale turnover of alcohol by bar hotels. The KGST Act was amended by Kerala Finance Act, 2005 providing far payment of tax at compounded rate by bar licencees running hotels not being star hotels of … 1963. They are running bar attached hotels within the area of Municipal Corporation, Municipal Council and other places.3. Section 5(2) of the Act, among other things provides for levy of turnover tax at 10% on the sale turnover

Mahyco Monsanto Biotech (India) Pvt. Ltd. and Others Vs. THE UNION OF ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

impregnated seed is a service, and this is liable to be taxed under the relevant provisions of the Finance Act as amended, read with the Rules that pertain to service tax. This is a central levy. The transaction … Sales Tax Tribunal. The appeal succeeded (Monsanto Petition, Exhibit H , pp. 92 110). 17. From 1st April 2005, the VAT regime replaced the sales tax regime, and this covers lease transactions, attracting a tax of 4% … Added Tax Act, 2002 ( the MVAT Act ); the definitions under Sections 65(105)(zzr), 65(55a) and 65(55b) of the Finance Act, 1994; and sub-clause (c) … and Findings in Monsanto............................... 20 V. Facts in the Subway Petition ............................................. 50 VI. Submissions and Findings in SubwaY...................................53 VII. Conclusion.........................................................................65 I. INTRODUCTION 1. These

Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi-i Vs. Joint Secretary(Revisionar ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Excise

Finance Act, 2003 (32 of 2003); xxxxxxxxxxxx (xi) the additional duty of excise leviable under section 85 of Finance Act, 2005 (18 of 2005 ) paid on- (i) any input or capital goods received in the factory of manufacture … the duty chargeable under this section as they apply in relation to the duties leviable under that Act.” 5. It is, therefore, clear from the reading of the aforesaid provision that CVD charged on the imported goods

State of West Bengal Vs. Calcutta Club Limited

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service Tax

in life insurance under the life insurance service, whereas this service was introduced in the year 2002. The Finance Act, 2005 brought 9 new services under the service tax net. The Finance Act, 2006 brought 15 new services under … Court, reported in State of West Bengal v. Calcutta Club Limited (2017) 5 SCC356 The facts of Civil Appeal No.4184 of 2009 are set out … therefore, no sales tax could be levied.4. The Tribunal referred to Article 366(29-A) of the Constitution of India, Section 2(30) of the Act, its earlier decision in Hindustan Club Ltd. v. CCT [Hindustan Club Ltd. v. CCT,

Essar Steel Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Customs

Acts : Finance Act, 2007 - Sections 99 and 114; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 7, 12, 22, 25, 28(1), 30 and 76A to 76N; Sea Customs Act; Special Economic Zones Act, 2005 - Sections 1, 2, 2(1), 3, 3(1), 4, 4(1), 4(2), 4(4), 5, 7, 12, 15(9), 26, 26(1), 26(2), 30, 51, 53, 53(1), 53(2) and 55; Motor Vehicles Act - Sections 38 and 38(1); Taxation Act - Sections 3, 3(1) and 4A; Trade Marks Act - Sections 28; Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 3; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 4 and 4(1); Factories Act, 1948; Sea Customs (Amendment) Act, 1955; Land Customs Act; Indian Aircrafts Act, 1911; Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - Sections 2, 2(15), 2(18), 2(19), 2(20), 2(22), 2(23), 2(25), 2(26), 2(27), 12, 14, 14(1), 17, 18, 46 and 50; Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951; Income

Reported in : [2010]24STT121

permitted the goods into the zone. By virtue of Section 114(n) read with the 3rd Schedule to the Finance Act, 2007, Heading No. 11 of the Second Schedule - Export Tariff to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 was … of the Customs Act, 1962 that existed in relation to SEZ scheme, prior to the enactment of SEZ Act, 2005. Section 76F(1) provided for levy of export duty on supplies from DTA to SEZ and also provided or levy … Section 4 provides for establishment of Special Economic Zone and approval and authorization to operate it to developer. Section 5 contains guidelines for notifying Special Economic Zone. Section 7 which assumes importance in the context of the present

State of Kerala vs the Malayala Manorama Company Ltd,

Court : Kerala

it has the effect of extending the period of limitation from five years to six years. As per Finance Act of 2005 the period of limitation under Section 17(6) of the KGST Act was fixed as five years. … the period of limitation prescribed by Section 17(6) of the Act from five years to six years. The 5th provisoadded by Finance Act of 2005 to Section 17(6) siates that the assessment relating to the year 2000

Vindhyachal Distilleries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Service Tax

Acts : Finance Act, 2005 - Sections 65(76), 68 and 69; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 2; Madhya Pradesh Excise Act, 1915; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 65, 66 and 68(1); Madhya Prades General Sales Tax Act, 1958 - Sections 2; Madhya Pradesh Country Spirit Rules, 1995; Madhya Pradesh Country Spirit Rules, 1995 - Rules 2A and 3(3); Service Tax Rules, 1994 - Rules 4A, 4A(1) and 6; Service Tax (Amendemnt), Rules 1997 - Rule 2; Service Tax Rules, 1944

Reported in : (2007)7VST197(MP)

Distilleries Pvt. Ltd. (in W.P. No. 2346/2006).3. It is further averred that on 16.6.2005 Section 65(76)(b) of the Finance Act, 2005 was amended and 'Packaging Activity' was also brought within the ambit of service tax. On 9th September, 2005, … that if the retailer demands he will be supplied with country spirit of 25 degree under proof and 50 degree under proof in 180 ml and 60 degree under proof in 250 ml bottles in lieu of

State of Kerala & Another versus Asianet Satellite Communications ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : [2025] 5 S.C.R. 2215

Finance Act, 2004 are not being reproduced here.2282 [2025] 5 S.C.R. Supreme Court Reports 7.3.18 Insofar as the Finance Act, 2005 is concerned, it re- defined the term “broadcasting” under Section 65(16). Section 65(16) of the Finance Act, 2005

Indian National Shipowners Association Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

Acts : Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 5(2), 64, 65, 65(105), 66, 66A, 68, 68(2), 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 and 94; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 25; Merchant Shipping Act, 1958; Territorial Waters, Continental Shelf, Exclusive Economic Zone, and other Maritime Zones Act, 1976 - Sections 6(6) and 7(7); Factories Act, 1948; Societies Registration Act, 1860; Central Excise Act, 1944; Finance Act, 2005; Finance Act, 2006; Service Tax Rules, 1994 - Rule 2 and 2(1); Central Excise Rules; Constitution of India - Article 265

Reported in : (2009)222CTR(Bom)234; [2009]16STJ175; 2009[13]STR235

justified.19. Then reliance is placed on explanation which is added below Section 65(105). That explanation was added by Finance Act, 2005 with effect from 16-6-2005. That explanation reads as under:Explanation - For the removal of doubts, it is hereby … Finance Act, 1994 provided for the registration of a person responsible for collecting service tax. Sub-section 2 of Section 5 indicated that it was provider of the service who was responsible for collecting the tax and oblige to