Advanced Search Results

Punj Lloyd Ltd. Vs. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

conduitâ? from such date as the Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, appoint. The said Finance Act 2005 came into force on 13th May, 2005. 4. The respondent introduced the Commercial Addendum No.1 in the tender … the learned senior counsel is of thus no assistance to the petitioner. 49. In case of Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. vs. Punj Lloyd Ltd. and … 1. By this petition filed under section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the petitioner has impugned the arbitral award 28th April, 2011

Bangalore University Vs. Ramachandran

Court : Karnataka

Subject : ConstitutionService

Acts : Karnataka State Universities Act, 1976 - Sections 49(1) to 49(8) and 49(9)

Reported in : ILR1985KAR3774; 1985(2)KarLJ520

Scheme, 1968, and increase the maximum limit of subscription in the P P F Account as per the Finance Act, 2005, within three months. PUBLIC PROVIDENT FUND SCHEME 3458. Maximum limit of amount remittable; [K. Bhakthavatsala, J] Scheme limiting … to the post of Professor is required to be made by promotion on the basis of Seniority-cum-Merit under Section 49 (9) of the Karnataka State Universities Act, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') and the appointment of

Ags Entertainment Private Limited Vs. Union of India

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Declaration, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction under Article 226 declaring that Section 65(105)(zzzzt) of the Finance Act, 1994 as amended by Finance Act, 2010 unconstitutional and ultra vires, Article 246 of the Constitution of India … Writ Petition Nos.29398 of 2010, 482, 483, 1361, 7887, 17245, 28040 of 2011 231, 832, 2138, 2947, 3144, 4904, 5777, 5900, 5902, 5904, 5906, 6220, 31291 of 2012 1676, 1777, 3362, 6575, 15259, 16461 and 17223 of

State of Rajasthan Vs. Uka and ors.,

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Tenancy

shown that there are certain provisions therein which inhibit the entry of commercial Banks into the field of financing of agriculture. It will, therefore, be necessary to modify these laws for the purpose of enabling commercial banks … useful to notice certain relevant statutes and the facts associated.THE RAJASTHAN TENANCY ACT, 19553. On 30.3.1949, the State of Rajasthan was formed on integration of … the said sections to any person who is not a member of a scheduled caste or a scheduled tribe.Section 49-A . Special provision for exchange by members of scheduled castes or scheduled tribes' Notwithstanding anything contained in Section

Grasim Cement Vs. Madhya Pradesh Electricity Board

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : ElectricityCivil

Acts : Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 49

Reported in : AIR2004MP176; 2004(3)MPLJ231

and bottling of liquor whether amounts to manufacture within meaning of Section 2(f) of Central Excise Act 1944? Finance Act 932 of 1994), Section 65 (76 b) (as amended on 16.6.2005) - Held, The first limb of the … provided therein. When the matter stood thus the Board in exercise of its powers vested in it under Section 49 of the Electricity Supply Act, 1948 (for brevity 'the Act') issued a notification dated 24-1-1996. After the notification

State of Kerala Vs. George Jacob

Court : Kerala

Subject : Civil

Acts : Kerala Finance Act, 2005; ;Kerala Stamp Act, 1959 - Sections 2, 2(12), 3, 9, 17, 27, 33, 35, 40, 60 and 64 ;Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 23, 25, 31, 32, 35, 47, 49, 61, 74, 88 and 89; ;Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 53A, 54 and 59; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 64 - Order 38, Rule 10; ;Transfer of Property (Amendment) Supplementary Act, 1929 - Sections 10; ;Theft Act, 1968 - Sections 20(2); ;Indian Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 2(14) and 2(17); ;Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 175(3)

Reported in : AIR2006Ker111; 2005(4)KLT709

Matched in: Citation AIR2006Ker111; 2005(4)KLT709

State of M.P. and anr. Vs. Mahendra Kumar Saraf and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1961 - Sections 24, 24(1), 36, 36(1), 36(4), 41, 45, 47, 47(1), 47(2), 49, 49(1), 55, 323 and 331; Madhya Pradesh Municipalities (Amendment) Act, 1999 - Sections 47; Madhya Pradesh Municipalities (Amendment) Act, 1997 - Sections 36(1) and 55

Reported in : 2005(4)MPHT185; 2005(3)MPLJ578

Matched in: Citation 2005(4)MPHT185; 2005(3)MPLJ578

M/s. Greatship (India) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Service Tax Mumbai-I a ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

“Supply of Tangible Goods for use” as has been defined under Section 65(105)(zzzzj) of Chapter V of the Finance Act, 1994 (hereinafter referred to as “the said Act”). It is also not in dispute that the appellant has … in Simpson case (supra) sought to determine whether a deed poll constituted a settlement for the purposes of Section 49 of the Stamp Duties Act, 1898 (NSW). Section 3 which defined the word ‘settlement as meaning ‘any contract

Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Uttamchand V. Sethiya

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Direct Taxation

Appellate Tribunal is right in deleting the surcharge levied by the Assessing Officer under the provisions of the Finance Act, 1999?" TAX APPEAL NOS. 419, 1393, 1394, 1431 TO 1435 of 2007 and 440 of 2008 "Whether, on … A search and seizure operation was carried out at the residential and business premises of the assessee under section 132 of the Act. The assessee filed return for the block period within 45 days of receipt of

M/s. D.P. Jain and Company Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

tax amounting to Rs.10,25,72,125/- should not be demanded from it under the provisions of section 73(1) of the Finance Act, 1994. Interest under section 75 was proposed to be recovered and penalties under sections 76, 77 and 78 … and Anr. vs. State of U. P., 1959 Supp (2) SCR 875 49. Mr. Jetly appearing for the respondents fully supports the impugned order. Mr. … runways; (iii) site formation activity undertaken at roads. The dispute in the present case pertains to period from 2005-06 to 2009-10. 7. In the month of July, 2010, investigations were conducted by the officers of Service Tax