Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: finance act 2005 section 35 · Page 1 of about 2,952 results (0.114 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 05 2008

Krishna Lifestyle Technologies Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through t ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-05-2008

Subject : Excise

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 142; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11; Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI), 2005 - Sections 13(6) and 35; Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI), 2002; Finance Act, 2004 - Sections 11; Central Boards of Revenue Act, 1963 - Sections 11D; Customs Act, 1862; Karnataka Land Revenue Act - Sections 158 and 190; Contract Act - Sections 176; Central Sales Tax Act - Sections 9; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 100; State Financial Corporation Act, 1951 - Sections 29 and 29(2); Karnataka Sales Tax Act - Sections 15; State Corporation Act, 1951 - Sections 25; Income Tax Act - Sections 2(13); Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 - Se

Reported in : (2008)110BOMLR456; 2008BusLR314(Bom); 2008(125)ECC208; 2008(151)LC208(Bombay); 2008(229)ELT173(Bom); 2009[16]STR669

issues, it would be necessary to reproduce Section 11 along with the proviso which was inserted by the Finance Act No. 2 of 2004 to the Central Excise Act, 1944 and which reads as under:11. Recovery of sums … secured creditors under the provisions of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2005 (in short 'SARFAESI Act')?2. What is the effect of a prior attachment by revenue of the property of … the facts and circumstances of each case.Yet another aspect which we have to consider is the effect of Section 35 of the SARFAESI Act which reads as under:The provisions of this Act shall have effect, notwithstanding anything inconsistent

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 16 2015

Reserve Bank of India Vs. Jayantilal N. Mistry

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-16-2015

Subject : Right to Information

| |1. | As mentioned at 2(a) what |Pursuant to the then Finance | | |is RBI doing about |Minister’s Budget Speech made | | … in these transferred cases is as to whether all the information sought for under the Right to Information Act, 2005 can be denied by the Reserve Bank of India and other Banks to the public at large on … No.|Information sought |Reply | |1. |Procedure Rules and |RBI is conducting inspections | | |Regulations of Inspection |under Section 35 of the B.R. | | |being carried out on |Act 1949 (AACS) at prescribed | | |Co-operative Banks

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 08 2006

B.S. Enterprises Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Nov-08-2006

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Bihar Value Added Tax Act, 2005 - Sections 14, 16, 16(1), 24, 56(2), 93, 94 and 95; Bihar Finance Act, 1981; Bihar Finance Act, 2006; Central Sales Tax Act - Sections 8(4), 13(3), 13(4) and 15; Mysore Sales Tax Act - Sections 5(4); Bihar Value Added Tax Rules - Rules 13, 56, 56(1) and 56(2); Land Ceiling Act; High Denomination Bank Notes (Demonetisation) Act, 1978; Bihar Value Added Tax Ordinance, 2005 - Sections 1(3) and 2 to 99; Mysore Sales Tax Rules - Rule 39A(2) and 39A(3); Bihar Sales Tax Rules, 1983 - Rule 35; Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules - Rules 7(3) and 9; Central Sales Tax (Kerala) Rules - Rule 6(1)

Matched in: Advocate S.D. Sanjay and Suraj Samdarshi, Advs. in C.W.J.C. No. 14725/05, Ramesh Kumar Agrawal, Anupanand Jha and Gopi Krishna, Advs. in C.W.J.C. Nos. 12390 & 12397 of 2005 and Prakash Sahay, Adv. in C.W.J.C. P.K. Shahi, Adv. General, Rai Shivaji Nath, A.A.G., Raj Nandan Prasad, Vikash Kumar and Purnendu Singh, Advs.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Oct 27 2005

State of Kerala Vs. George Jacob

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Oct-27-2005

Subject : Civil

Acts : Kerala Finance Act, 2005; ;Kerala Stamp Act, 1959 - Sections 2, 2(12), 3, 9, 17, 27, 33, 35, 40, 60 and 64 ;Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 23, 25, 31, 32, 35, 47, 49, 61, 74, 88 and 89; ;Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 53A, 54 and 59; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 64 - Order 38, Rule 10; ;Transfer of Property (Amendment) Supplementary Act, 1929 - Sections 10; ;Theft Act, 1968 - Sections 20(2); ;Indian Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 2(14) and 2(17); ;Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 175(3)

Reported in : AIR2006Ker111; 2005(4)KLT709

Matched in: Citation AIR2006Ker111; 2005(4)KLT709

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 19 2009

Great Galleon Limited and ors. Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-19-2009

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 2009(3)MPHT356

manufacturing activity and is not covered by 'packaging activity' as defined in Section 65 (76 g) of the Finance Act, 2005 read with definition of 'taxable service' in Section 65 (105) (zzzf) of the Service Tax Act.(2) Whether the … Breweries Ltd., Indore and two others, filed W.A. No. 718/06. When the said appeal was pending, I.A. No. 3540/07 was filed seeking permission for withdrawal of the appellant No. 3, namely, Gwalior Distilleries Ltd., from this appeal.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 02 2013

Givaudan India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-02-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

Area Anekal Taluk, Jigan”106. .. Petitioner Vs.1. The Union of India rep. by the Revenue Secretary Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue North Block, New Delh”001. 2. The Chairman Central Board of Excise and Customs North Block, … Central Excise and the other party to the appeal. (4) Save as provided in the National Tax Tribunal Act, 2005, orders passed by the Appellate Tribunal on appeal shall be final." "Section 35-F. Deposit, pending appeal of duty

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 04 2007

Commissioner of Customs (Port) Vs. Goel Airshrienk (India) Ltd.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Decided on : Jul-04-2007

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2007)(122)ECC248

views.3. Section 35B(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 prior to its amendment by Section 79 of the Finance Act, 2005 at the relevant point of time read as follows: (2) The Commissioner of Central Excise may, if he … Excise may, if he is of opinion that order passed by the Appellate Commissioner of Central Excise under Section 35, as it stood immediately before the appointed day, or the Commissioner (Appeals) under Section 35A, is not legal

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 09 2010

M/S.Malaysian Airlines. M/S.Saudi Arabian Airlines. and ors Vs. the Un ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-09-2010

Subject : Service Tax

Acts : Constitution Of India - Article 226

under Article 226 of the Constitution of India are challenging imposition of penalty under section 38(3) of the Finance Act, 1979 ("Finance Act" or "Act" for short) for delay in payment of Foreign Travel Tax ("FTT" for short) … directed by respondent No.4.19. On remand, vide its order dated 14th June, 2005, the respondent No.2 set aside the orderin original passed by respondent dated … on the Carrier who fails to pay the foreign travel tax to the credit of Central Government under section 35(2) not less than onefifth, which may extend to three times the amount of tax not paid to Central

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 13 2013

G.D. Builders Vs. Uoi and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-13-2013

Subject : Service Tax

but does not include road, airport, railway, transport terminal, bridge, tunnel, long distance pipeline and dam;‖ 4. By Finance Act 2005 service tax was imposed under Section 65(105)(zzq) on any service provided or to be provided, to any person

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 18 2020

Centre for Public Interest Litigation Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-18-2020

Subject : Land Acquisition

made by the learned counsel for the parties. Chapter IX of the Disaster Management Act, 2005 deals with Finance, Accounts and Audit. Section 46 provides for National Disaster Response Fund. Section 46 reads:51. “46. National Disaster Response … disasters and for undertaking a holistic, coordinated and prompt response to any disaster situation.” 4. The Disaster Management Act, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as “Act, 2005”) was enacted to provide for the effective management of disasters and matters … systems at regional levels  Epidemiological disease mapping  Health facilities mapping 35 Recurring/ Regular(RR) Maintaining preventive measures as per norms Short Term(T1) Strengthening integrated

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial