Advanced Search Results

State of Kerala Vs. George Jacob

Court : Kerala

Subject : Civil

Acts : Kerala Finance Act, 2005; ;Kerala Stamp Act, 1959 - Sections 2, 2(12), 3, 9, 17, 27, 33, 35, 40, 60 and 64 ;Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 23, 25, 31, 32, 35, 47, 49, 61, 74, 88 and 89; ;Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 53A, 54 and 59; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 64 - Order 38, Rule 10; ;Transfer of Property (Amendment) Supplementary Act, 1929 - Sections 10; ;Theft Act, 1968 - Sections 20(2); ;Indian Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 2(14) and 2(17); ;Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 175(3)

Reported in : AIR2006Ker111; 2005(4)KLT709

Matched in: Citation AIR2006Ker111; 2005(4)KLT709

Shiny George Ambat vs Union of India

Court : Kerala

laid before both Houses of Parliament. “ 40.Section 33 provides that the provisions of the Right to Information Act, 2005 shall apply to each Institute as if it were a public authority established by notification issued or made … JYAISHTA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 25484 OF 2017 PETITIONER: SHINY GEORGE AMBAT WIFE OF SUNNY GEORGE, AGED 47 YEARS,CHIEF FINANCE OFFICER (UNDER ORDER OF TERMINATION),INDIAN INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT, KOZHIKODE,RESIDING AT VILA NO.16, BLUE NOON VILA,KARANTHUR P.O., KUNNAMANGALAM, KOZHIKODE

Union of India & Anr vs.sunny Abraham

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

Sunny Abraham with the approval of the disciplinary authority. The disciplinary authority in the present case was the Finance Minister, who while granting approval had examined the detail note with full particulars of the imputations.5. Thereafter, charge … disciplinary authority did not agree and the disagreement note dated 6th June, 2005 was issued. Pavan Ved thereafter submitted his reply on 20th July, 2005. … may itself inquire into, or appoint under this rule or under the provisions of the Public Servants (Inquiries) Act, 1850, as the case may be, an authority to inquire into the truth thereof. (3) Where it is … we find no such compelling circumstances justifying reading any such implication into Section 29(1) of the Act." Ordinarily, the difference between approval and permission is … permission, of which mention is made in Section 33(1)." XXXX then without 15. The words used in

Union of India & Anr. Vs.shri Pavan Ved & Anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

Sunny Abraham with the approval of the disciplinary authority. The disciplinary authority in the present case was the Finance Minister, who while granting approval had examined the detail note with full particulars of the imputations.5. Thereafter, charge … disciplinary authority did not agree and the disagreement note dated 6th June, 2005 was issued. Pavan Ved thereafter submitted his reply on 20th July, 2005. … may itself inquire into, or appoint under this rule or under the provisions of the Public Servants (Inquiries) Act, 1850, as the case may be, an authority to inquire into the truth thereof. (3) Where it is … we find no such compelling circumstances justifying reading any such implication into Section 29(1) of the Act." Ordinarily, the difference between approval and permission is … permission, of which mention is made in Section 33(1)." XXXX then without 15. The words used in

The Commissioner of Income Tax-Ii vs.mitsubishi Corporation India Pvt. ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

been amendments to the Act. The Finance Act, 2004, that came into operation with effect from 1st April, 2005, substituted/added sub-clauses (i), (ia) and (ib) to Section 40 (a) of the Act. Section 195 of the Act … the expenses towards purchases made on the ground of non-deduction of TDS was not sustainable. Amendments to the Finance Act, 16. The Herbalife (supra) decision was rendered in the context of AY2001 02 and the present case relates … upon Aggarwal Chamber of Commerce, Ltd v. Ganpat Rai Hira Lal [1958]. 33 ITR245SC) (hereafter ‘Ganpat Rai’), to submit that even if a payee is

Tata MaIn Hospital Vs. the State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Sales Tax/VAT

Acts : Bihar Finance Act, 1981 - Sections 2, 3, 7(3), 17(5) and 33; Sale of Goods Act, 1930; Government of India Act, 1935; Constitution of India - Articles 336 and 366

Reported in : [2008(2)JCR174(Jhr)]

not a transaction which comes within the meaning of 'Sale' as defined under Section 2(t) of the Bihar Finance Act, 1981 and, therefore, is not taxable under the said Act.(ii) For declaration that the petitioner does not come … regarding sale and purchase of medicines were supplied to the team and, therefore, under the provision of Section 33(i) of the Act, the petitioner TMH was directed to attend the office of the Deputy Commissioner, Commercial Taxes,

Magus Construction Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors ...

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Service Tax

any person, by a commercial concern, in relation to construction service 18. Prior to its amendment by the Finance Act, 2005, Clause (30a) of Section 65 of the Finance Act, 1994, which contained the definition of 'construction service', read … be works contract, is wholly without jurisdiction....37. The Central Board of Direct Taxes has also, vide Circular No. 332/35/ 2006-TRU, dated August 1, 2006, clarified that if no person is engaged for construction work and the builder/promoter/developer

Virtual Soft Systems Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-i

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 28(1), 48, 143, 143(1), 143(1A), 260A, 271 and 271(1); Finance Act, 1975; Finance Act, 2002 - Sections 271; Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1975; Finance Act, 1993; Finance Act, 1992; Finance Act, 1951; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 23(5), 28 and 28(1); Constitution of India - Article 20(1)

Reported in : (2007)207CTR(SC)733; [2007]289ITR83(SC); JT2007(3)SC125; 2007(2)SCALE612; (2007)9SCC665

the Punjab and Haryana High Court pertaining to the assessment year 1970-71 was prior to the amendment of Finance Act, 1975 and therefore, was not applicable. For the same reason, the decision of this Court in affirming the … point involved in all these appeals is the same.2. Facts are taken from Civil Appeal No. 7115 of 2005.Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-I, the respondent herein, filed ITA No. 340 of 2004 in the High Court of … passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (for short 'the Tribunal') under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act. Assessee also filed ITA No. of

State of Rajasthan Vs. Uka and ors.,

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Tenancy

shown that there are certain provisions therein which inhibit the entry of commercial Banks into the field of financing of agriculture. It will, therefore, be necessary to modify these laws for the purpose of enabling commercial banks … issue under consideration, it may be useful to notice certain relevant statutes and the facts associated.THE RAJASTHAN TENANCY ACT, 19553. On 30.3.1949, the State of Rajasthan was formed on integration of several independent Princely States and Chief-ships … of the Act of 1955 is to safeguard the interest of weaker sections of the society. Sections 42, 46-A and 49-A of this Act restrict … Bank, Branch Raniwada by mortgaging 1.28 hectares of land in khasra No. 339/378. He failed to pay the loan advanced, therefore, proclamation for sale of

Shyamal Kumar Roy Vs. Sushil Kumar Agarwal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 2(14), 31, 32, 33, 35, 36, 38, 39, 40 and 61; Indian Stamp (West Bengal Amendment) Act, 1990; West Bengal Finance Act, 2006; West Bengal Act - Sections 33(4) and 33(5); Marwar Stamp Act, 1947; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 151

Reported in : AIR2007SC637; (SCSuppl)2007(1)CHN15; JT2006(9)SC483; (2007)1MLJ617(SC); 2006(11)SCALE159; (2006)11SCC331; 2007AIRSCW234

terms whereof stamp duty on instruments have been fixed and have undergone further amendment by the West Bengal Finance Act, 2006. It was also contended that the High Court also committed a serious error in not entertaining the … submitted that the application filed by Respondent herein was barred under the proviso appended to Sub-Section (5) of Section 33 of the West Bengal Act. It was further urged that Section 36 of the Indian Stamp Act has … appeal.11.3 In Mujibar Rahman Mondal v. Md. Abdulla Molla and Ors. : 2005(4)CHN387 , this Court held:.The Court has to judicially determine the matter as