Advanced Search Results
T.Oommen Panicker vs the Commercial Tax Officer,
Kerala
Mar-14-2019
barred by limitation, as per the proviso to Section 17 (6) of the KGST Act, as amended by Finance Act, 2005 (Act 10 ofW.A. No.762/2019 -:4:- 2005). Exhibit P12 is a consolidated demand notice issued seeking realization of the … to the sales tax dues.3. The assessment completed with respect to the year2000-2001 is Ext.P10, which is dated 28-03-2006. It is conceded that the appellant had filed statutory appeal against Ext.P10 before the Deputy Commissioner (Appeals). The
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK.M.Suprabha,Principal vs State of Kerala
Kerala
Oct-28-2020
the appellants are not entitled to get any relief being a public authority under the Right to information Act 2005 and liable to provide information in terms of the provisions of the Act, 2005.2. The common judgement of … this Court and before the ApexCourt. However, the Apex Court found that section 2(h) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 deals with six different … appeals W.A.NO.1990 OF 2007 & con.cases. 15 in order to identify as to whether the institutions are substantially financed by the State Government or not since there was no evidence available before the court. It is accordingly … CHIEF JUSTICE MR.S.MANIKUMAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY WEDNESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2020 / 6TH KARTHIKA, 1942 WA.No.1990 OF 2007 AGAINST
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDr.G.Mohan Sreekumar,Principal vs State of Kerala
Kerala
Oct-28-2020
the appellants are not entitled to get any relief being a public authority under the Right to information Act 2005 and liable to provide information in terms of the provisions of the Act, 2005.2. The common judgement of … this Court and before the ApexCourt. However, the Apex Court found that section 2(h) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 deals with six different … appeals W.A.NO.1990 OF 2007 & con.cases. 15 in order to identify as to whether the institutions are substantially financed by the State Government or not since there was no evidence available before the court. It is accordingly … CHIEF JUSTICE MR.S.MANIKUMAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY WEDNESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2020 / 6TH KARTHIKA, 1942 WA.No.1990 OF 2007 AGAINST
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Dr.Jeevan Lal,Principal vs State of Kerala & Others
Kerala
Oct-28-2020
the appellants are not entitled to get any relief being a public authority under the Right to information Act 2005 and liable to provide information in terms of the provisions of the Act, 2005.2. The common judgement of … this Court and before the ApexCourt. However, the Apex Court found that section 2(h) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 deals with six different … appeals W.A.NO.1990 OF 2007 & con.cases. 15 in order to identify as to whether the institutions are substantially financed by the State Government or not since there was no evidence available before the court. It is accordingly … CHIEF JUSTICE MR.S.MANIKUMAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY WEDNESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2020 / 6TH KARTHIKA, 1942 WA.No.1990 OF 2007 AGAINST
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDr. N.Viswarajan, Principal vs State of Kerala & Others
Kerala
Oct-28-2020
the appellants are not entitled to get any relief being a public authority under the Right to information Act 2005 and liable to provide information in terms of the provisions of the Act, 2005.2. The common judgement of … this Court and before the ApexCourt. However, the Apex Court found that section 2(h) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 deals with six different … appeals W.A.NO.1990 OF 2007 & con.cases. 15 in order to identify as to whether the institutions are substantially financed by the State Government or not since there was no evidence available before the court. It is accordingly … CHIEF JUSTICE MR.S.MANIKUMAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY WEDNESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2020 / 6TH KARTHIKA, 1942 WA.No.1990 OF 2007 AGAINST
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDr.S.V.Sudheer,Principal vs State of Kerala & Others
Kerala
Oct-28-2020
the appellants are not entitled to get any relief being a public authority under the Right to information Act 2005 and liable to provide information in terms of the provisions of the Act, 2005.2. The common judgement of … this Court and before the ApexCourt. However, the Apex Court found that section 2(h) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 deals with six different … appeals W.A.NO.1990 OF 2007 & con.cases. 15 in order to identify as to whether the institutions are substantially financed by the State Government or not since there was no evidence available before the court. It is accordingly … CHIEF JUSTICE MR.S.MANIKUMAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY WEDNESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2020 / 6TH KARTHIKA, 1942 WA.No.1990 OF 2007 AGAINST
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDr. Suma Narayan, Principal vs State of Kerala & Others
Kerala
Oct-28-2020
the appellants are not entitled to get any relief being a public authority under the Right to information Act 2005 and liable to provide information in terms of the provisions of the Act, 2005.2. The common judgement of … this Court and before the ApexCourt. However, the Apex Court found that section 2(h) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 deals with six different … appeals W.A.NO.1990 OF 2007 & con.cases. 15 in order to identify as to whether the institutions are substantially financed by the State Government or not since there was no evidence available before the court. It is accordingly … CHIEF JUSTICE MR.S.MANIKUMAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY WEDNESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2020 / 6TH KARTHIKA, 1942 WA.No.1990 OF 2007 AGAINST
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskB.Vijaya Babu vs State of Kerala
Kerala
Oct-28-2020
the appellants are not entitled to get any relief being a public authority under the Right to information Act 2005 and liable to provide information in terms of the provisions of the Act, 2005.2. The common judgement of … this Court and before the ApexCourt. However, the Apex Court found that section 2(h) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 deals with six different … appeals W.A.NO.1990 OF 2007 & con.cases. 15 in order to identify as to whether the institutions are substantially financed by the State Government or not since there was no evidence available before the court. It is accordingly … CHIEF JUSTICE MR.S.MANIKUMAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY WEDNESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2020 / 6TH KARTHIKA, 1942 WA.No.1990 OF 2007 AGAINST
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDr. K.N.Kamalasanan, Principal vs State of Kerala & Others
Kerala
Oct-28-2020
the appellants are not entitled to get any relief being a public authority under the Right to information Act 2005 and liable to provide information in terms of the provisions of the Act, 2005.2. The common judgement of … this Court and before the ApexCourt. However, the Apex Court found that section 2(h) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 deals with six different … appeals W.A.NO.1990 OF 2007 & con.cases. 15 in order to identify as to whether the institutions are substantially financed by the State Government or not since there was no evidence available before the court. It is accordingly … CHIEF JUSTICE MR.S.MANIKUMAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY WEDNESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2020 / 6TH KARTHIKA, 1942 WA.No.1990 OF 2007 AGAINST
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDr. K.S. Anitha, Principal vs State of Kerala & Others
Kerala
Oct-28-2020
the appellants are not entitled to get any relief being a public authority under the Right to information Act 2005 and liable to provide information in terms of the provisions of the Act, 2005.2. The common judgement of … this Court and before the ApexCourt. However, the Apex Court found that section 2(h) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 deals with six different … appeals W.A.NO.1990 OF 2007 & con.cases. 15 in order to identify as to whether the institutions are substantially financed by the State Government or not since there was no evidence available before the court. It is accordingly … CHIEF JUSTICE MR.S.MANIKUMAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY WEDNESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2020 / 6TH KARTHIKA, 1942 WA.No.1990 OF 2007 AGAINST
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »