Advanced Search Results

Mckinsey and Company Inc. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2007)10STJ57CESTAT(Mum.)bai

In support thereof reliance was placed on CESTAT decision in the case of Glaxo Smithkline Pvt. Ltd. - 2005 (188) E.L.T. 171. As regards abatement of these expenses we find that Section 67(q) of the Finance Act, … of payment of service tax, a penalty of Rs. 14,15,00,000/- on M/s Mckinsey under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. On appeal, his order was upheld by Commissioner (Appeals).6. We have considered the rival submissions from both … further came to notice that besides above amount, an amount of Rs. 21,96.35,560/- was recovered by the assessee from its client towards the core documents

Vindhyachal Distilleries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Service Tax

Acts : Finance Act, 2005 - Sections 65(76), 68 and 69; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 2; Madhya Pradesh Excise Act, 1915; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 65, 66 and 68(1); Madhya Prades General Sales Tax Act, 1958 - Sections 2; Madhya Pradesh Country Spirit Rules, 1995; Madhya Pradesh Country Spirit Rules, 1995 - Rules 2A and 3(3); Service Tax Rules, 1994 - Rules 4A, 4A(1) and 6; Service Tax (Amendemnt), Rules 1997 - Rule 2; Service Tax Rules, 1944

Reported in : (2007)7VST197(MP)

Distilleries Pvt. Ltd. (in W.P. No. 2346/2006).3. It is further averred that on 16.6.2005 Section 65(76)(b) of the Finance Act, 2005 was amended and 'Packaging Activity' was also brought within the ambit of service tax. On 9th September, 2005,

Maa Sharda Wine Traders Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Excise

Reported in : AIR2009MP207; 2009(3)MPHT304; 2009[15]STR3; [2009]22STT105; (2009)22VST170(MP); 2009(5)AIRKarR498

constitutional validity of Section 65(76b) of the Finance Act, 1994 (for short, 'the Act') as amended by the Finance Act, 2005 was challenged primarily and principally on the ground that there is lack of legislative competence on the part … case of Tamil Nadu Kalyana Mandapam Assn. : [2004]267ITR9(SC) and thereafter expressed the view as under : (page 211 of 7 VST)It is clear from the transaction that only the service was to be provided for the

The Additional Commissioner, Central Excise, Madurai Vs. M/s. Strategi ...

Court : Chennai Madurai

Subject : Service Tax

in relation to erection, commissioning or installation fo plant, machinery or equipment." 12. By Section 88 of the Finance Act, 2005, Section 65(39a) was amended. The amended Section 65(39a) reads as follows: "(39a) 'erection, commissioning or installation' means any service … was eventually allowed by a learned Judge on 08.08.2011. The appeal filed by the Department was admitted on 21.11.2011. Thus, a total period of 9 years has passed from the date of the order-in-original. A period of

G. Narayan Reddy Vs. P. Narayana Reddy

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

same quoted with the approval of the Full Bench of this Court in Mohd.Siddiq Ali Khan V. Shahsun Finance Ltd (2005(2) ALD 675 (FB) Section 27 - Extinguishments of right to property: At the determination of the … date of suit or not in the suit for specific performance of the contract for sale. In fact, Section 21 of the Act takes care of it, enabling the Court while permitting to say it relates back. 27(iv).

Rajeevkumar vs Remya Manoharan

Court : Kerala

Vashdeo Bhojwani v. Indusind Bank Ltd. [(2005) 2 SCC 217]; M/s. Shankar Finance and Investment v. State of A.P. [AIR 2009 SC 422]; and Man … provisions under Section 7 of the Family Courts Act.28. Section 26 of the Protection of Women from DomesticViolence Act, 2005 deals with relief in other suits and legal proceedings. As per sub-section (1) of Section 26, any relief … proceedings. As per sub-section (1) of Section 26, any relief available under Section 18, Section 19, Section 20, Section 21 and Section 22 may also be sought in any legal proceeding, before a civil court, family court or

National Joint Committee for Steel Industry vs R.K. Mishra and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

of orders dated 24.12.2012 and 29.01.2016passed by the Central Information Commission (hereinafter “CIC”) under the Right to Information Act, 2005 (hereinafter “RTI Act, 2005”), relating to disclosure of information concerning the National Joint Committee for Steel Industry (hereinafter … Cooperative Bank Ltd. v. State of Kerala1 to contend that burden to establish that a body is substantially financed16:10:21 5 KUMAR KAURAV or controlled by the Government lies upon the applicant seeking information.12. Per contra, learned counsel … has been held to be a “public authority” within the meaning of Section 2(h) of the RTI, Act 2005.3. W.P.(C) 6512/2016 has been preferred by

Steel Authority of India Ltd vs Sh.R.K.Mishra

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

of orders dated 24.12.2012 and 29.01.2016passed by the Central Information Commission (hereinafter “CIC”) under the Right to Information Act, 2005 (hereinafter “RTI Act, 2005”), relating to disclosure of information concerning the National Joint Committee for Steel Industry (hereinafter … Cooperative Bank Ltd. v. State of Kerala1 to contend that burden to establish that a body is substantially financed16:10:21 5 KUMAR KAURAV or controlled by the Government lies upon the applicant seeking information.12. Per contra, learned counsel … has been held to be a “public authority” within the meaning of Section 2(h) of the RTI, Act 2005.3. W.P.(C) 6512/2016 has been preferred by

Tata Steel Ltd. and ors. Vs. the State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Bihar Finance Act, 1981 - Sections 7, 7(2), 7(3), 22, 46 and 46(4); Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 8(5); Jharkhand Value Added Tax Act, 2005 - Sections 15, 16, 17, 18, 95, 95(3) and 96(3); Bihar Sales Tax Act, 1981; Bihar Reorganization Act, 2000 - Sections 84 and 85; Orissa Sales Tax Act - Sections 6; State General Sales Tax Act; General Clauses Act - Sections 21; Central Sales Tax (Bihar) Rules, 1956; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 299, 301 and 304

Reported in : 2007(2)BLJR1153; [2007(2)JCR180(Jhr)]; (2007)7VST109(Jharkh)

challenge is made to Notification No. S.O.201 dated 30th March, 2006, issued under Section 7(3)(b) of' the Bihar Finance Act, 1981, whereby and whereunder, Notification Nos. S.O.478 dated 22nd December, 1995, S.O.57 dated 2nd March, 2000, S.O.479 dated … notifications, constitutional validity of the provisions of Section 95(3)(ii) and Section 96(3) of the Jharkhand Value Added Tax Act, 2005 is also questioned. In view of the commonality of the grounds of challenge, all these writ petitions were … true construction and purpose of Clause 19/20 of S.O.478/479.29. It is next contended by Mr. Modi that under Section 21 of the General Clauses Act the State has the power to rescind, modify or alter its orders and,

M/S. Suzlon Infrastructure Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune.ii ...

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

of service tax under the category of ‘Erection, Commissioning or Installation service’ as defined in Sec,65(39a) of the Finance Act, 1994, the officers of Directorate General of Central Excise Intelligence (DGCEI), New Delhi conducted investigation into the matter. … to 30.9.2005. The notice also proposed to impose penalty on it under Sec.76 for contravention of provisions of Section 68 and penalty under Section 78 of Chapter V of the Finance Act, 1994 for evasion of service … and (ii) above, it was availing the benefit under Notification No.19/2003-ST dated 21/8/2003 which provides that in case of a contract involving erection, commissioning or