Advanced Search Results

isaac Jaise and anr. Vs. Jasmit Singh Saluja and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 406 and 420

Reported in : 2003CriLJ1980

and bottling of liquor whether amounts to manufacture within meaning of Section 2(f) of Central Excise Act 1944? Finance Act 932 of 1994), Section 65 (76 b) (as amended on 16.6.2005) - Held, The first limb of the … Criminal Case No. 279/02 as well as impugned order dated 2-7-2002 thereby, dismissing the application filed under Sections 203, 204 Cr PC, by the applicants for their discharge.2. The contention of the learned counsel for the applicant

Surender Babbar vs.delhi Transco Ltd. & Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

ED (Finance). Secondly, respondent no.4 being the Company Secretary / ED Corporate Governance in DTL is not from Finance cadre of DTL; thirdly, respondent No.4 does not meet the eligibility criterion for the appointment to the post … DTL. He would draw my attention to the order dated April 8, 2005 to contend that the employees on the rolls of the DTL are … of June 5, 2017 attracts statutory restriction as per the W.P.(C) No.5260/2017 Page 3 of 17 provisions of Section 203 of the Companies Act, 2013. He qualifies the aforesaid broad submissions to contend that the respondent No.4 who

M/S. Suzlon Infrastructure Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune.ii ...

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

of service tax under the category of ‘Erection, Commissioning or Installation service’ as defined in Sec,65(39a) of the Finance Act, 1994, the officers of Directorate General of Central Excise Intelligence (DGCEI), New Delhi conducted investigation into the matter. … to 30.9.2005. The notice also proposed to impose penalty on it under Sec.76 for contravention of provisions of Section 68 and penalty under Section 78 of Chapter V of the Finance Act, 1994 for evasion of service

Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation Vs. C ...

Court : UK Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

such cases: para 260. It was not open to the Revenue to rely on section 320 of the Finance Act 2004 ("Section 320 FA 2004") or section 107 of the Finance Act 2007 ("Section 107 FA 2007") to … . . ." 108. The Court of Appeal gave judgment in DMG, reversing Park J, on 4 February 2005: [2006] Ch 243. Mr Aaronson described the Court of Appeal's decision as a "bump in the road", suggesting … Walker (see para 115), I agree with Lord Sumption's reasoning in para 203 as to section 107 FA 2007. 16. On the primary issue however,

M/s. Lakshminirman Bangalore Pvt. Ltd., Rep. by its Managing Director ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Direct Taxation

227 of Constitution of India praying to declare the newly inserted Sec.234E of the IT Act, by the Finance Act, 2012 as unconstitutional being arbitrary, discriminatory and unreasonable, the relevant extract of Section 234E is enclosed as Annexure-A. … person deducting any sum on or after the 1st day of April, 2005 in accordance with the foregoing provisions of this Chapter or, as the … xxx (2) If any person fails- (a) to (f) xxx (g) to furnish a certificate as required by Section 203 (or Section 206C); or (h) to (j) xxx (k) to deliver or cause to be delivered a copy

Indian Hotels and Restaurant Association Represented by Its Treasurer ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

India, the Petitioners are claiming a writ, order or direction declaring clause (zzzzv) of Section 65(105) of the Finance Act, 2010 as ultravires the Constitution of India, null, void and of no legal affect. It is prayed that … 364 M/s Gannon Dunkerley and Co. and others v/s State of Rajasthan and others. (17) (1969) 72 ITR 203 (SC) Income Tax Officer v/s Mani Ram and others. 27. On the other hand, Mr. Setalwad, learned Additional

Reckitt Benckiser (India) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner, Commercial Taxes

Court : Kerala

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Kerala Value Added Tax (Amendment) Act, 2005; Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 - Sections 6, 6(1), 62(1), 43, 67, 74 and 94; Central Excise Tariff Act; Customs Tariff Act, 1975; Kerala General Sales Tax Act; Finance Act, 2006; Kerala Value Added Tax Rules, 2003 - Rule 80(1)

Reported in : (2007)6VST390(Ker)

and tax has been levied on that basis. Further, HSN Code appearing in entry 44(5) was deleted by Finance Act, 2006 to overcome the confusion created with reference to that HSN Code. Referring to the decision of the … fall under entry 44(5) of the Third Schedule to the VAT Act, 2003 as amended by KVAT (Amendment) Act, 2005 and taxable at four per cent. Commissioner also clarified that Harpic toilet cleaner and Lizol disinfectant floor cleaner … 12.5 per cent on sale of insect repellents as per proposal No. 203 in the Budget speech of 2006-2007 and proposed to amend serial number … the petitioner in W.P.C. No. 16721 of 2006. Appeal was preferred under Section 62(1) of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 read with Rule

M/s Sobha Ltd Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

ETC., IN WRIT PETITION No.55442/2015 BETWEEN SOBHA LIMITED (FORMERLY SOBHA DEVELOPERS LIMITED) A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT1956AND HAVING ITS REGISTERED AND CORPORATE OFFICE AT SOBHA, SARJAPUR MARTHAHALLI OUTER RING ROAD (ORR), DEVERABEESANAHALLI BELLANDUR POST, BENGALURU … MANGALORE, IN CRIME NO.86/2016 REGISTERED BY THE VENOOR POLICE AS AGAINST THE PETITIONER FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION36 42, 44, 3 OF MMRD ACT AND KMMC RULES1994AND SECTION214]., 21[4A]., 4, A[1A]. OF MINES AND MINERAL REGULATION

Puravankara Limited Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

ETC., IN WRIT PETITION No.55442/2015 BETWEEN SOBHA LIMITED (FORMERLY SOBHA DEVELOPERS LIMITED) A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT1956AND HAVING ITS REGISTERED AND CORPORATE OFFICE AT SOBHA, SARJAPUR MARTHAHALLI OUTER RING ROAD (ORR), DEVERABEESANAHALLI BELLANDUR POST, BENGALURU … MANGALORE, IN CRIME NO.86/2016 REGISTERED BY THE VENOOR POLICE AS AGAINST THE PETITIONER FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION36 42, 44, 3 OF MMRD ACT AND KMMC RULES1994AND SECTION214]., 21[4A]., 4, A[1A]. OF MINES AND MINERAL REGULATION

Sri B M Ramanna Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

ETC., IN WRIT PETITION No.55442/2015 BETWEEN SOBHA LIMITED (FORMERLY SOBHA DEVELOPERS LIMITED) A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT1956AND HAVING ITS REGISTERED AND CORPORATE OFFICE AT SOBHA, SARJAPUR MARTHAHALLI OUTER RING ROAD (ORR), DEVERABEESANAHALLI BELLANDUR POST, BENGALURU … MANGALORE, IN CRIME NO.86/2016 REGISTERED BY THE VENOOR POLICE AS AGAINST THE PETITIONER FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION36 42, 44, 3 OF MMRD ACT AND KMMC RULES1994AND SECTION214]., 21[4A]., 4, A[1A]. OF MINES AND MINERAL REGULATION