Advanced Search Results

State of Kerala Vs. George Jacob

Court : Kerala

Subject : Civil

Acts : Kerala Finance Act, 2005; ;Kerala Stamp Act, 1959 - Sections 2, 2(12), 3, 9, 17, 27, 33, 35, 40, 60 and 64 ;Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 23, 25, 31, 32, 35, 47, 49, 61, 74, 88 and 89; ;Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 53A, 54 and 59; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 64 - Order 38, Rule 10; ;Transfer of Property (Amendment) Supplementary Act, 1929 - Sections 10; ;Theft Act, 1968 - Sections 20(2); ;Indian Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 2(14) and 2(17); ;Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 175(3)

Reported in : AIR2006Ker111; 2005(4)KLT709

Matched in: Citation AIR2006Ker111; 2005(4)KLT709

Punj Lloyd Ltd. Vs. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

conduitâ? from such date as the Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, appoint. The said Finance Act 2005 came into force on 13th May, 2005. 4. The respondent introduced the Commercial Addendum No.1 in the tender … 1. By this petition filed under section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the petitioner has impugned the arbitral award 28th April, 2011 … Conciliation Act, 1996, the petitioner has impugned the arbitral award 28th April, 2011 passed by the learned arbitrator rejecting part of the claims made by

Dr. N.Viswarajan, Principal vs State of Kerala & Others

Court : Kerala

the appellants are not entitled to get any relief being a public authority under the Right to information Act 2005 and liable to provide information in terms of the provisions of the Act, 2005.2. The common judgement of … this Court and before the ApexCourt. However, the Apex Court found that section 2(h) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 deals with six different … appeals W.A.NO.1990 OF 2007 & con.cases. 15 in order to identify as to whether the institutions are substantially financed by the State Government or not since there was no evidence available before the court. It is accordingly … THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY WEDNESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2020 / 6TH KARTHIKA, 1942 WA.No.1990 OF 2007 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WPC

Dr.S.V.Sudheer,Principal vs State of Kerala & Others

Court : Kerala

the appellants are not entitled to get any relief being a public authority under the Right to information Act 2005 and liable to provide information in terms of the provisions of the Act, 2005.2. The common judgement of … this Court and before the ApexCourt. However, the Apex Court found that section 2(h) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 deals with six different … appeals W.A.NO.1990 OF 2007 & con.cases. 15 in order to identify as to whether the institutions are substantially financed by the State Government or not since there was no evidence available before the court. It is accordingly … THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY WEDNESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2020 / 6TH KARTHIKA, 1942 WA.No.1990 OF 2007 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WPC

Dr. K.N.Kamalasanan, Principal vs State of Kerala & Others

Court : Kerala

the appellants are not entitled to get any relief being a public authority under the Right to information Act 2005 and liable to provide information in terms of the provisions of the Act, 2005.2. The common judgement of … this Court and before the ApexCourt. However, the Apex Court found that section 2(h) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 deals with six different … appeals W.A.NO.1990 OF 2007 & con.cases. 15 in order to identify as to whether the institutions are substantially financed by the State Government or not since there was no evidence available before the court. It is accordingly … THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY WEDNESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2020 / 6TH KARTHIKA, 1942 WA.No.1990 OF 2007 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WPC

K.M.Suprabha,Principal vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

the appellants are not entitled to get any relief being a public authority under the Right to information Act 2005 and liable to provide information in terms of the provisions of the Act, 2005.2. The common judgement of … this Court and before the ApexCourt. However, the Apex Court found that section 2(h) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 deals with six different … appeals W.A.NO.1990 OF 2007 & con.cases. 15 in order to identify as to whether the institutions are substantially financed by the State Government or not since there was no evidence available before the court. It is accordingly … THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY WEDNESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2020 / 6TH KARTHIKA, 1942 WA.No.1990 OF 2007 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WPC

Dr.G.Mohan Sreekumar,Principal vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

the appellants are not entitled to get any relief being a public authority under the Right to information Act 2005 and liable to provide information in terms of the provisions of the Act, 2005.2. The common judgement of … this Court and before the ApexCourt. However, the Apex Court found that section 2(h) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 deals with six different … appeals W.A.NO.1990 OF 2007 & con.cases. 15 in order to identify as to whether the institutions are substantially financed by the State Government or not since there was no evidence available before the court. It is accordingly … THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY WEDNESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2020 / 6TH KARTHIKA, 1942 WA.No.1990 OF 2007 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WPC

Dr.Jeevan Lal,Principal vs State of Kerala & Others

Court : Kerala

the appellants are not entitled to get any relief being a public authority under the Right to information Act 2005 and liable to provide information in terms of the provisions of the Act, 2005.2. The common judgement of … this Court and before the ApexCourt. However, the Apex Court found that section 2(h) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 deals with six different … appeals W.A.NO.1990 OF 2007 & con.cases. 15 in order to identify as to whether the institutions are substantially financed by the State Government or not since there was no evidence available before the court. It is accordingly … THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY WEDNESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2020 / 6TH KARTHIKA, 1942 WA.No.1990 OF 2007 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WPC

Dr. Suma Narayan, Principal vs State of Kerala & Others

Court : Kerala

the appellants are not entitled to get any relief being a public authority under the Right to information Act 2005 and liable to provide information in terms of the provisions of the Act, 2005.2. The common judgement of … this Court and before the ApexCourt. However, the Apex Court found that section 2(h) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 deals with six different … appeals W.A.NO.1990 OF 2007 & con.cases. 15 in order to identify as to whether the institutions are substantially financed by the State Government or not since there was no evidence available before the court. It is accordingly … THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY WEDNESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2020 / 6TH KARTHIKA, 1942 WA.No.1990 OF 2007 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WPC

B.Vijaya Babu vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

the appellants are not entitled to get any relief being a public authority under the Right to information Act 2005 and liable to provide information in terms of the provisions of the Act, 2005.2. The common judgement of … this Court and before the ApexCourt. However, the Apex Court found that section 2(h) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 deals with six different … appeals W.A.NO.1990 OF 2007 & con.cases. 15 in order to identify as to whether the institutions are substantially financed by the State Government or not since there was no evidence available before the court. It is accordingly … THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY WEDNESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2020 / 6TH KARTHIKA, 1942 WA.No.1990 OF 2007 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WPC