Advanced Search Results

M/S. Mangalore Refinery and Petrochemicals Limited Vs. the Commissione ...

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Subject : Customs

Ramanan contested the challenge to jurisdiction relying on the decision of the Tribunal in the case of Sundaram Finance vs. Commissioner of Customs reported in 2012 (279) E.L.T. 220 (Tri.-Chennai) and the decision of the Tribunal in … of the Tribunal in Jay Ushin Ltd. v. CC (Import), Chennai - 2005 (181) E.L.T. 120 (Tri. - Del.), following the Larger Bench decision in … Bills of Entry (Bs/E No. 596, 599 and 600 all dated 05.03.1999) were held liable for confiscation under Section 111(m) of Customs Act, 1962. Since, the goods were not available for confiscation, a fine of Rs. 10,00,000/- was

K.R.Venugopalan Nair Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

the 6th respondent it is pleaded that he is functioning as Member, Finance in the KSEB. He being in charge of managing financial affairs of … respondents 3 and 4 as Members of the Commission, petitioner made an application under the Right to Information Act, 2005 to find out as to how many applications were received. Reply was that there were altogether 90 applications … person aggrieved by the tariff order is entitled to file an appeal before the Electricity Appellate Tribunal under Section 111 of the 2003 Act. W.P(C) No.19551 of 2012 and connected cases -:10. :- 8. Respondent No.5 has filed

Godrej Industries Ltd. Vs. Dy. Cit

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2006)8SOT417(Mum.)

in Tata Engg. & Locomotive Co. Ltd. v. Dy.CIT (2005) 92 ITD 111 (Mum.) and Royal Airways Ltd. v. Addl. DIT (2005) 98 TTJ (Delhi) … Government. During the period from December 1995 to February 1997, approvals had been granted by the Ministry of Finance after the respective due dates for payment of tax deducted at source. in the meantime, on the respective … was allowable to the assessee because the refund on account of TDS was not under the Income Tax Act and therefore, there is no provisions under the Income Tax Act to allow interest on such refunds. The … objecting in confirming that no interest was allowable to the assessee under section 244A in respect of the refund of excess tax deducted at source

Capital Land Builders Pvt Ltd & Ors vs.m/s Shaheed Memorial Societ ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

and S.O. 130(E) dated 28th January, 2004 issued by the Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue. From this standpoint, the stamp duty to be affixed … revealed in the information provided by Indian Security Press, Nasik to the Defendants No.4 to 6 through RTI Act 2005, it is apparent that the aforesaid Transfer Deeds are forged documents manufactured at a much later date that … records. This claim is also falsified by the own stand of the Society in the proceedings initiated under Section 111 of the said Act wherein they wanted their names to be inserted in the register of members of

Delhi Development Authority Vs. M/S. Karamdeep Finance and Investment ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Income Tax Act, 1961 deals with vesting of property in Central Government. Section 269UE has been amended by Finance Act, 1993 w.e.f. 17.11.1992. Amended Section 269UE sub-section (1) is as follows: “269UE. Vesting of property in Central Government.-(1) … we read Clauses 1, 2 and 3 together.26. Learned counsel for the writ petitioner relying on provisions of Section 111 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 contends that leasehold rights have been merged in the lessor since

Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Vs. M/s Shamanur Sugars Limit ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

to be made by the Commission involves a very highly technical procedure, requiring working knowledge of law, engineering, finance, commerce, economics and management, It would be more appropriate and effective if a statutory appeal is provided to … for about 32 weeks was prepared in accordance with Open Access Regulations, 2005 of GERC and Open Access Regulation, 2008 of GERC. Subsequently, on representation … review proceedings before the courts and not by way of appeal before the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity under Section 111 of the said Act. (iv) Section 121 of the 2003 Act does not confer power of judicial review

Damodar Valley Corporation Vs. Central Electricity Regulatory

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : MRTP

was canvassed on behalf of Maithan Alloys & Bhaskar Shrachi that part-IV of the DVC Act deals with finance, accounts and audit and does not deal with determination of tariff. Therefore, Regulations framed under the Act of … Commission (hereinafter referred to as CERC/Central Commission) in Petition No. 66 of 2005 filed by the Damodar Valley Corporation (hereinafter referred to as 'DVC' or … Tribunal has no jurisdiction to examine the validity of the Regulations in exercise of its appellate jurisdiction under Section 111 of the Act. The Appellant, has also submitted that it is not challenging the vires of the regulations

Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited Vs. R.K. Powergen Pri ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; ;Karnataka Electricity Reforms Act, 1999 - Sections 25; ;Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 111, 111(2), 112 and 113

Reported in : ILR2005KAR5468; 2006(2)KarLJ608

to be made by the Commission involves a very highly technical procedure, requiring working knowledge of law, engineering, finance, commerce, economics and management, It would be more appropriate and effective if a statutory appeal is provided to … of the petition which is as follows:'Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner has filed the present petition. Although Section 111 of Electricity Act, 2003 provides for an appeal against an order passed by Commission, the Appellate Authority has

S. Sukhdeep Singh Jhikka Vs. S. Ajit Singh Deogan and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Company

Reported in : [2009]150CompCas182(P& H)

adequate notice itself constitutes acts of oppression. To the said proposition, the reliance has been made on Malleswara Finance and Investments Co. P. Ltd. v. Company Law Board [1995] 82 Comp Cas 836, where a Bench of … of the shareholding and the non-transmission of shares did nothing till August 2005, when they filed a petition before the Company Law Board. The main … proof of death or grant of probate as succession certificate, the remedy was to file a petition under Section 111 of the Act. The claim itself was hopelessly barred by limitation.III. The disposition of the Company Law Board:5.

S. Kanthimathy, S. Lakshmi, S. Vs. the Woodlands Estates Limited and

Court : Company Law Board CLB

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2008)144CompCas830

reasons of its complexity. This decision was approved by Division Bench of the Bombay High Court in Shirish Finance & Investment (P) Ltd. v. M. Sreenivasulu Reddy (2002) 35 SCL 27 by observing inter-alia, the following: ...We … The first company petition (C.P. No. 10/2005) is filed under Section 111A read with Section 111 of the Companies Act. 1956 ("the Act") - (i) to rectify the register of members of The Woodland