Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: finance act 2005 section 102 · Page 1 of about 696 results (0.082 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 09 2008

Maersk India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-09-2008

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2008)10STR397

Logistic India Pvt Ltd (hereinafter referred to as MLOG for short) is taxable under Section 65(102) of the Finance Act, 1994; he confirmed demand of Service Tax made in the Show Cause Notice to the extent of Rs.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 30 2020

Sreelekshmi .S. vs the State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jun-30-2020

for a period upto 31.05.2020. Whereas, in exercise of the powers under section 6(2)(i) of the Disaster Management Act, 2005, National DisasterManagement Authority (NDMA) has directed the undersigned to issue an order to extend the lockdown in Containment … Containment Zones: Now therefore, in exercise of the powers, conferred under Section 102)(1) of the Disaster Management Act, 2005, the undersigned hereby directs that guidelines, … the contemplation of self-financing institution is not amenable to the writ jurisdiction of this Court. Being a self- financing institution, the school has got the invoidable right to fix its own fees commensurate with the quality of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 21 2008

One Stop Airline Mro Support Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court : Authority for Advance Rulings

Decided on : Jan-21-2008

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2008)(126)ECC216

Tariff Act - Sections 107 and 108; Indian Aircraft Rules - Rules 2(49), 30, 134(1) and 134(1)(1A); Bihar Finance Act, 1981 - Section 13(1)Hemraj Gordhandas v. H.H. Dave, Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs, Surat 1969 (2) … (2) S.C.R. 252 : 1967 (2) E.L.T. P.350; Commissioner of Customs (Imports), Mumbai v. Tullow India Operations Limited 2005 (189) E.L.T. 401; Oblum Electrical Industries Pvt. Ltd. v. Collector of Customs, BombayCollector of Central Excise v. Parle … reason that the Applicant does not satisfy the requirements of Condition No. 102, firstly because the Applicant is not directly concerned with the maintenance/repair of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 14 2006

Sap India Systems, Applications Vs. the Commissioner of Service Tax

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on : Aug-14-2006

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2007)(114)ECC83

as "Management Consultant" for the period from 16.10.1998 to 31.03.2000 under the provisions of Section 73 of the Finance Act, 1944. The Commissioner has given very detailed findings to hold that the appellant rendered indeed services as 'Management

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 27 2006

Reckitt Benckiser (India) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner, Commercial Taxes

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Nov-27-2006

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Kerala Value Added Tax (Amendment) Act, 2005; Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 - Sections 6, 6(1), 62(1), 43, 67, 74 and 94; Central Excise Tariff Act; Customs Tariff Act, 1975; Kerala General Sales Tax Act; Finance Act, 2006; Kerala Value Added Tax Rules, 2003 - Rule 80(1)

Reported in : (2007)6VST390(Ker)

and tax has been levied on that basis. Further, HSN Code appearing in entry 44(5) was deleted by Finance Act, 2006 to overcome the confusion created with reference to that HSN Code. Referring to the decision of the … fall under entry 44(5) of the Third Schedule to the VAT Act, 2003 as amended by KVAT (Amendment) Act, 2005 and taxable at four per cent. Commissioner also clarified that Harpic toilet cleaner and Lizol disinfectant floor cleaner … Kerala and Sunitha Diesel Sales & Services v. State of Kerala [1996] 102 STC 448 (Ker).6. O.T.C. No. 4 of 2006 was filed challenging the … the petitioner in W.P.C. No. 16721 of 2006. Appeal was preferred under Section 62(1) of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 read with Rule

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 05 2014

Lim Siew Bee Vs. Lim Boh Chuan and Another

Court : Singapore Supreme Court

Decided on : Mar-05-2014

Subject : Education

property, is intended to fall on the beneficiaries according to their respective interests. Under s 14(1) of the Finance Act 1894 a rateable part of such duty, paid by a person authorised to do so, may be recovered … In their submissions on this point, the parties referred to the now- repealed Estate Duty Act (Cap 96, 2005 Rev Ed) ("the 2005 EDA") instead of the 1970 EDA. This is immaterial in so far as the … arrangements with the executor to discharge his obligation to pay such duty. 102. In the present case, the executor paid the whole of the estate … Cc Cash82,450.00 5to Mdm Lim Kim Luan, cash15,000.00$1,631,082.80 $4,218,037.03 Deduct Exemption under Section 14(2)(b) 100,000.00 $4,118,037.03 27. The prolonged and meandering correspondences between the Commissioner

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 27 2024

Manappuram Finance Ltd., vs the State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Decided on : Sep-27-2024

2024 (GM-POLICE), WRIT PETITION NO. 105010 OF 2024 (GM-POLICE) IN WRIT PETITION NO. 104593 OF 2024 BETWEEN MANAPPURAM FINANCE LIMITED, A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT 1956, HAVING REGISTERED OFFICE AT MANAPPURAM HOUSE, A.O. VALAPAD, TRISSUR … Court. So also further proviso which was inserted by Act No.25 of 2005 with effect from 23.06.2006 which is clear that where the property seized … documents as well as material objects to submit a final report, the recovery is necessary and as per Section 102 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, ‘Cr.P.C.’) the Court cannot control or interfere with investigation by

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 27 2024

Manappuram Finance Ltd, vs the State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Decided on : Sep-27-2024

2024 (GM-POLICE), WRIT PETITION NO. 105010 OF 2024 (GM-POLICE) IN WRIT PETITION NO. 104593 OF 2024 BETWEEN MANAPPURAM FINANCE LIMITED, A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT 1956, HAVING REGISTERED OFFICE AT MANAPPURAM HOUSE, A.O. VALAPAD, TRISSUR … Court. So also further proviso which was inserted by Act No.25 of 2005 with effect from 23.06.2006 which is clear that where the property seized … documents as well as material objects to submit a final report, the recovery is necessary and as per Section 102 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, ‘Cr.P.C.’) the Court cannot control or interfere with investigation by

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 27 2024

Muthoot Finance Limited vs the State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Decided on : Sep-27-2024

2024 (GM-POLICE), WRIT PETITION NO. 105010 OF 2024 (GM-POLICE) IN WRIT PETITION NO. 104593 OF 2024 BETWEEN MANAPPURAM FINANCE LIMITED, A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT 1956, HAVING REGISTERED OFFICE AT MANAPPURAM HOUSE, A.O. VALAPAD, TRISSUR … Court. So also further proviso which was inserted by Act No.25 of 2005 with effect from 23.06.2006 which is clear that where the property seized … documents as well as material objects to submit a final report, the recovery is necessary and as per Section 102 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, ‘Cr.P.C.’) the Court cannot control or interfere with investigation by

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 11 2016

Mahyco Monsanto Biotech (India) Pvt. Ltd. and Others Vs. THE UNION OF ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-11-2016

Subject : Service Tax

impregnated seed is a service, and this is liable to be taxed under the relevant provisions of the Finance Act as amended, read with the Rules that pertain to service tax. This is a central levy. The transaction … Sales Tax Tribunal. The appeal succeeded (Monsanto Petition, Exhibit H , pp. 92 110). 17. From 1st April 2005, the VAT regime replaced the sales tax regime, and this covers lease transactions, attracting a tax of 4% … Added Tax Act, 2002 ( the MVAT Act ); the definitions under Sections 65(105)(zzr), 65(55a) and 65(55b) of the Finance Act, 1994; and sub-clause (c) … had by then already filed (Subway Petition, Exhibit I , pp. 100 102; Exhibit J , pp. 103 107).Respondent No. 4 did not accept this

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial