Advanced Search Results

In Re: G.V. Films Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 1, 2, 2(12), 3, 9, 2(12), 75, 78, 78(1), 78(2), 94 to 97, 100 to 105, 217(1), 235 to 251, 390 to 394 and 643; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 21; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rules 47 and 85; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 38, Rule 5

Reported in : [2009]150CompCas415(Mad)

has it prohibited any method of effecting that object-per Lord Herschell L.C. in British and American Trustee and Finance Corporation v. Couper [1894] AC 397 (HL), at page 405, quoted with approval by Lord Reid in Westburn … shares in exchange in the resulting companies, the demerged company has to comply with the statutory requirement under Section 101(2)(b) of the Act. In this, he placed reliance on the decision of the Chancery Division reported in [1957]

Reserve Bank of India Vs. Jayantilal N. Mistry

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

|Information Sought |Reply | |No.| | | |1. | As mentioned at 2(a) what |Pursuant to the then Finance | | |is RBI doing about |Minister’s Budget Speech made | | |uploading the entire list |in Parliament … in these transferred cases is as to whether all the information sought for under the Right to Information Act, 2005 can be denied by the Reserve Bank of India and other Banks to the public at large on … Rules and |RBI is conducting inspections | | |Regulations of Inspection |under Section 35 of the B.R. | | |being carried out on |Act 1949

State of Kerala, vs Indian Medical Association, Kerala State Branch,

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

a taxable supply for the purposes of the levy of tax. The amendment that was introduced through the Finance Act, 2021 was also made retroactive with effect from 01.07.2017, thereby adding to the financial woes of the petitioner.5. … Thus, the position of law prevailing at the time of the Constitution 101 st Amendment - empowering the Parliament and the State legislatures to levy … to themselves. The said basis of non- taxability was, however, removed by an amendment of the provisions of Section 2(17)(e) and Section 7(1)(aa) read with the Explanation thereto of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017

Additional Director General, Directorate of GST Intelligence vs Indian ...

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

a taxable supply for the purposes of the levy of tax. The amendment that was introduced through the Finance Act, 2021 was also made retroactive with effect from 01.07.2017, thereby adding to the financial woes of the petitioner.5. … Thus, the position of law prevailing at the time of the Constitution 101 st Amendment - empowering the Parliament and the State legislatures to levy … to themselves. The said basis of non- taxability was, however, removed by an amendment of the provisions of Section 2(17)(e) and Section 7(1)(aa) read with the Explanation thereto of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017

Indian Medical Association, Kerala State Branch, vs Union of India,

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

a taxable supply for the purposes of the levy of tax. The amendment that was introduced through the Finance Act, 2021 was also made retroactive with effect from 01.07.2017, thereby adding to the financial woes of the petitioner.5. … Thus, the position of law prevailing at the time of the Constitution 101 st Amendment - empowering the Parliament and the State legislatures to levy … to themselves. The said basis of non- taxability was, however, removed by an amendment of the provisions of Section 2(17)(e) and Section 7(1)(aa) read with the Explanation thereto of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017

Nml Capital Limited (Appellant) Vs. Republic of Argentina (Respondent)

Court : UK Supreme Court

Subject : MRTP

the state". Section 3(3)(b) defines "commercial transaction" as including "any loan or other transaction for the provision of finance¦". In view of this definition it is not surprising that it is common ground that the action in … Rep 181, [2006] EWCA Civ 1529; [2007] QB 886 (enforcement of Danish arbitral award under Arbitration Act 1996, section 101). 111.The question, to what do the proceedings for enforcement of the New York judgment "relate," can be given

Union of India Vs. Mohit Mineral Pvt Ltd

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service Tax

1975, the Central Excise Act, 1944, the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, the Finance Act, 2001 and the Finance Act, 2005 and to repeal certain enactments.31. By Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 2017, the Finance Act, 2010, Chapter VII has … Tax Compensation Cess Rules, 2017, the 2 Rules framed by the Central Government in exercise of power under Section 11 of the Goods and Service Tax (Compensation to States) Act, 2017 are under challenge in these cases.3. … i ca t i on in t h e Of f i ci a l G az e t te , specify: where Provided that

Vodafone International Holdings B.V. Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Income Tax

Acts : The Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 - Section 201(1), 201(1A), 9(1)(i), 163(1)(c), 2(14), 195, 163, 133(6), 195(1), 163, 115O; Indian Companies Act 1956 - Section 2(47), 3, 4; Transfer of Property Act 1961 ; Capital Cost Allowance Act - Section 24(1); Finance Act, 1994 - Section 150A(1); Constitution of India - Article 13(4), 10(1), 265, 246; Cayman Island Act - Section 184, 193; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Section 5(2), 9, 2(47), 2(14), 200(3), 203, 201, 271C, 276B, 191A, 194B, 194C, 194D, 194E, 194I, 194J, 115BBA, 194I, 194J,

tax be ignored but on the premise that the inserted transaction did not constitute disposal under the relevant Finance Act. Thus, Dawson is an extension of Ramsay principle. 63. After Dawson, which empowered the Revenue to restructure the … stood incorporated and listed on Hong Kong and New York Stock Exchanges in September, 2004. 6. In February, 2005, consolidation of HMTL (later on HEL) got effected. Consequently, all operating companies below HEL got held by one … state that on 31.05.2010, an Order was passed by the Department under Sections 201(1) and 201(1A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [the Act for

Virbhadra Singh & Anr vs.enforcement Directorate & Anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto." The law (PMLA) has been amended several times, lastly by the Finance Act, 2016 (Act No.28 of 2016). It is a measure to deal with "money-laundering", the definition of which expression … effect primarily arise from amendment of the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 by the Prevention of Money-Laundering (Amendment) Act, 2005 (Act 20 of 2005), particularly of the provision contained in Section 45. Prior to the said amendment Section … Mr. Vignaraj Pasayat, Advs. WP(C) 856/2016 & connected matters Page 1 of 101 + W.P.(CRL) 2862/2016 & Crl.M.A. Nos. 15292/2016. 18677/2016 VIKRAMADITYA SINGH ........ Petitioner

The Maharashtra State Cooperative Bank Limited Through Its Chief Offic ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : SICA

Acts : Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 - Sections 73G, 79A, 91, 101, 102, 102(1), 102(2), 103, 103(4), 104, 105, 105(1), 107, 154 and 246(1); Securatization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 - Sections 2(1), 2(2), 13, 13(2), 13(4), 13(9), 13(13), 17(2), 31, 31B, 34, 35 and 37; Banking Regulation Act, 1949 - Sections 2(1) and 5; Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 47; Transfer of Properties Act - Sections 59; Specific Reliefs Act - Sections 20; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 172 and 176; Sale of Goods Act, 1930; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 33; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 3, 529A and 529(1); Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992; Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956; Debt Recovery Act; Guj

Reported in : 2008(4)BomCR719

Matched in: Advocate R.N. Dhorde, Adv. in Writ Petition Nos. 1278 of 2004 and 6600 of 2005, ;S.T. Shelke, Adv. in Writ Petition No. 330 of 2005 and 5844 of 2007, ;R.R. Chandak, Adv. in Writ Petition No. 6092 of 2006, ;V.D N.B. Khandare, Govt. Pleader for Respondent No. 1 to 3, ;Dilip Bankar Patil, Adv. for Respondent No. 5, ;P.R. Patil, Adv. for Respondent No. 6, ;V.D. Salunke, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 7 to 11, ;B.L. S