Advanced Search Results

The Commissioner of Income Tax-9 Vs. Ajanta Pharma Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 10, 10A, 10B, 15JB, 80HHC, 80 HHC(1), 80 HHC(1A), 80 HHC(1B), 80HHC(3), 80HHC(3A), 80HHC(4), 80HHC(4A), 80HHC(10), 80HHD, 80HHD(3), 80HHG, 80HHE, 80HHF, 115(JB), 115J, 115J(2), 115JA, 115JA(1), 115JA(2), 115JB, 115JB(2), 115JD and 2888(2); Finance Act, 1996; Finance Act, 1997; Finance Act, 2000; Finance Act, 1987; Direct Tax Laws Amendment Act, 1989; Companies Act, 1956

Reported in : 2009(111)BomLR1905; (2009)223CTR(Bom)441; [2009]318ITR252(Bom); [2009]180TAXMAN494(Bom)

80 HHC as contended on behalf of the assessee. Section 80 HHC Sub-section 1B was introduced by the Finance Act with effect from 1.4.2001 so as to phase out the deduction completely by assessment year 2005- 06. Section … be, of that section, and subject to the condition specified in sub sections (4) and (4A) of that section. 10. Section 115JB was inserted by Finance Act, 2000 w.e.f. 1.4.2001. It contained (iv) to the Explanation. We have

Pan Polymers Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Kerala Finance Act, 2005; Kerala Surcharge on Tax Act, 1957; Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 - Sections 10, 10(1) and 10(3); Kerala Value Added Tax (Amendment) Act, 2005 - Sections 3, 11, 32, 32(1) and 98

Reported in : 2006(2)KLT329

into and for easy reference Section 32 of the said Act which now stands amended by the Kerala Finance Act, 2005 is extracted hereunder:32. Deferment of tax payable by Industrial Units: - (1) Where the Government had granted any … on the sale of their products for a period of seven years under Notification SRO 1729/1993 issued under, Section 10 of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act (hereinafter called ('the KGST Act'). The petitioners have been enjoying sales

Dr. N.Viswarajan, Principal vs State of Kerala & Others

Court : Kerala

the appellants are not entitled to get any relief being a public authority under the Right to information Act 2005 and liable to provide information in terms of the provisions of the Act, 2005.2. The common judgement of … this Court and before the ApexCourt. However, the Apex Court found that section 2(h) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 deals with six different … appeals W.A.NO.1990 OF 2007 & con.cases. 15 in order to identify as to whether the institutions are substantially financed by the State Government or not since there was no evidence available before the court. It is accordingly … THE COURT ON 28-102020 DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.A.NO.1990 OF 2007 & con.cases. 10IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

Dr.S.V.Sudheer,Principal vs State of Kerala & Others

Court : Kerala

the appellants are not entitled to get any relief being a public authority under the Right to information Act 2005 and liable to provide information in terms of the provisions of the Act, 2005.2. The common judgement of … this Court and before the ApexCourt. However, the Apex Court found that section 2(h) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 deals with six different … appeals W.A.NO.1990 OF 2007 & con.cases. 15 in order to identify as to whether the institutions are substantially financed by the State Government or not since there was no evidence available before the court. It is accordingly … THE COURT ON 28-102020 DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.A.NO.1990 OF 2007 & con.cases. 10IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

Dr. K.N.Kamalasanan, Principal vs State of Kerala & Others

Court : Kerala

the appellants are not entitled to get any relief being a public authority under the Right to information Act 2005 and liable to provide information in terms of the provisions of the Act, 2005.2. The common judgement of … this Court and before the ApexCourt. However, the Apex Court found that section 2(h) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 deals with six different … appeals W.A.NO.1990 OF 2007 & con.cases. 15 in order to identify as to whether the institutions are substantially financed by the State Government or not since there was no evidence available before the court. It is accordingly … THE COURT ON 28-102020 DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.A.NO.1990 OF 2007 & con.cases. 10IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

K.M.Suprabha,Principal vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

the appellants are not entitled to get any relief being a public authority under the Right to information Act 2005 and liable to provide information in terms of the provisions of the Act, 2005.2. The common judgement of … this Court and before the ApexCourt. However, the Apex Court found that section 2(h) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 deals with six different … appeals W.A.NO.1990 OF 2007 & con.cases. 15 in order to identify as to whether the institutions are substantially financed by the State Government or not since there was no evidence available before the court. It is accordingly … THE COURT ON 28-102020 DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.A.NO.1990 OF 2007 & con.cases. 10IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

Dr.G.Mohan Sreekumar,Principal vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

the appellants are not entitled to get any relief being a public authority under the Right to information Act 2005 and liable to provide information in terms of the provisions of the Act, 2005.2. The common judgement of … this Court and before the ApexCourt. However, the Apex Court found that section 2(h) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 deals with six different … appeals W.A.NO.1990 OF 2007 & con.cases. 15 in order to identify as to whether the institutions are substantially financed by the State Government or not since there was no evidence available before the court. It is accordingly … THE COURT ON 28-102020 DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.A.NO.1990 OF 2007 & con.cases. 10IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

Dr.Jeevan Lal,Principal vs State of Kerala & Others

Court : Kerala

the appellants are not entitled to get any relief being a public authority under the Right to information Act 2005 and liable to provide information in terms of the provisions of the Act, 2005.2. The common judgement of … this Court and before the ApexCourt. However, the Apex Court found that section 2(h) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 deals with six different … appeals W.A.NO.1990 OF 2007 & con.cases. 15 in order to identify as to whether the institutions are substantially financed by the State Government or not since there was no evidence available before the court. It is accordingly … THE COURT ON 28-102020 DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.A.NO.1990 OF 2007 & con.cases. 10IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

Dr. Suma Narayan, Principal vs State of Kerala & Others

Court : Kerala

the appellants are not entitled to get any relief being a public authority under the Right to information Act 2005 and liable to provide information in terms of the provisions of the Act, 2005.2. The common judgement of … this Court and before the ApexCourt. However, the Apex Court found that section 2(h) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 deals with six different … appeals W.A.NO.1990 OF 2007 & con.cases. 15 in order to identify as to whether the institutions are substantially financed by the State Government or not since there was no evidence available before the court. It is accordingly … THE COURT ON 28-102020 DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.A.NO.1990 OF 2007 & con.cases. 10IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

B.Vijaya Babu vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

the appellants are not entitled to get any relief being a public authority under the Right to information Act 2005 and liable to provide information in terms of the provisions of the Act, 2005.2. The common judgement of … this Court and before the ApexCourt. However, the Apex Court found that section 2(h) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 deals with six different … appeals W.A.NO.1990 OF 2007 & con.cases. 15 in order to identify as to whether the institutions are substantially financed by the State Government or not since there was no evidence available before the court. It is accordingly … THE COURT ON 28-102020 DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.A.NO.1990 OF 2007 & con.cases. 10IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE