Advanced Search Results

M/s. Bharti Airtel Ltd. Vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

the Education Cess on excisable goods leviable under section 91 read with section 93 of the Finance (No.2) Act, 2004 (23 of 2004)(via)(via) the Secondary and Higher Education Cess on excisable goods leviable under section 136 read with … amount of Rs.2,04,39,093/- under provisions of Rule 14 of the Credit Rules read with Section 73 of the Finance Act,1994. In respect of towers and parts thereof, prefabricated building, printers and office chairs, the Commissioner observed that the … in providing output service. Subsequently, information about use of the goods and Chapter heading under the Central Excise tariff was called for from the appellant. … “capital goods” or “inputs” as defined under the Cenvat Credit Rules,2004 ? 3. Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal

State of Kerala & Another versus Asianet Satellite Communications ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : [2025] 5 S.C.R. 2215

Taxation - referred to.List of Acts Constitution of India; Finance Act, 1994; Finance Act, 2002; Finance Act, 2003; Finance Act, 2004; The Kerala Tax on Luxuries Act,1976; Uttarakhand (Uttar Pradesh Entertainment and Betting Tax Act, 1979; Rajasthan Entertainments & … Canada’s Federal System by A.H.F. Lefroy; Tax, Constitution and the Supreme Court by Sri Karthik Sundaram (OakBridge, 2024); Chapter by Sri V. Niranjan, K.C. in Oxford Handbook of the Indian Constitution; Cooley on Taxation - referred to.List … India - Articles 246, 248 and Seventh Schedule, List I, II & III - Constitutional Scheme regarding distribution of Legislative Powers - Legislative competence to

G.D. Builders Vs. Uoi and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

on contracts relating to ―commercial and industrial construction‖ service or ―construction of (residential) complexes‖ services as specified by Finance Act 2004 and Finance Act 2005 respectively. The new levy imposed by Finance Act 2007 does not indicate or show … as under:―SECTION67 Valuation of taxable services for charging service tax. - (1) Subject to the provisions of this Chapter, where service tax is chargeable on any taxable service with reference to its value, then such value shall, … in List II (State List). In respect of matters enumerated in List III (Concurrent List) both Parliament and State Governments have powers to make laws.

Simplex Infrastructures Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Service Tax, Kolkata

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Service Tax

service tax for the fiRs.time was introduced in India in the year 1994 under Chapter V of the Finance Act, 1994. It has been amended from time to time, inter alia, by introducing more categories of services within … was brought under the purview of service tax with effect from 10th September, 2004 by the Finance (No.2) Act, 2004. The petitioner is making payment of service tax as per law and filing return regularly. (4) The levy

Manapuram Finance Limited vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

CHARGING EXORBITANT INTEREST ACT, 2004" AS BEING NOT APPLICABLE TO THE PETITIONER WHICH IS AN NBFC, REGISTERED UNDER CHAPTER III-B OF THE RBI ACT AND ETC. W.P.NO.7508/2012 BETWEEN: INDIA INFOLINE FINANCE LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS INDIA INFOLINE INVESTMENT … ACCUSED NO.1 FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE KARNATAKA PROHIBITION OF CHARGING EXORBITANT INTEREST ACT, 2004 PENDING IN THE FILE I ADDITIONAL CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE COURT, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BENGALURU CITY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON

Branch Manager Manappuram Finance Limited vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

CHARGING EXORBITANT INTEREST ACT, 2004" AS BEING NOT APPLICABLE TO THE PETITIONER WHICH IS AN NBFC, REGISTERED UNDER CHAPTER III-B OF THE RBI ACT AND ETC. W.P.NO.7508/2012 BETWEEN: INDIA INFOLINE FINANCE LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS INDIA INFOLINE INVESTMENT … AS ACCUSED NO.1, FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCES P/U/S 3 AND 4 OF KARNATAKA PROHIBITION OF CHARGING EXORBITANT INTEREST ACT, 2004 AND SECTION 5 AND 38 OF KARNATAKA MONEY LENDERS ACT, 1961, PENDING IN THE FILE OF 9TH ADDL.

Manager vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

CHARGING EXORBITANT INTEREST ACT, 2004" AS BEING NOT APPLICABLE TO THE PETITIONER WHICH IS AN NBFC, REGISTERED UNDER CHAPTER III-B OF THE RBI ACT AND ETC. W.P.NO.7508/2012 BETWEEN: INDIA INFOLINE FINANCE LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS INDIA INFOLINE INVESTMENT … FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 3 AND 4 OF THE KARNATAKA PROHIBITION OF CHARGING EXORBITANT INTEREST ACT, 2004 AND SECTION 420 OF THE INDIAN PENAL CODE PENDING ON THE FILE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN.) AND CJM

Branch Manager vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

CHARGING EXORBITANT INTEREST ACT, 2004" AS BEING NOT APPLICABLE TO THE PETITIONER WHICH IS AN NBFC, REGISTERED UNDER CHAPTER III-B OF THE RBI ACT AND ETC. W.P.NO.7508/2012 BETWEEN: INDIA INFOLINE FINANCE LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS INDIA INFOLINE INVESTMENT … FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 3 AND 4 OF THE KARNATAKA PROHIBITION OF CHARGING EXORBITANT INTEREST ACT, 2004 AND SECTIONS 5 AND 38 OF KARNATAKA MONEY LENDERS ACT, 1961, PENDING ON THE FILE OF IX ADDITIONAL

The Manager vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

CHARGING EXORBITANT INTEREST ACT, 2004" AS BEING NOT APPLICABLE TO THE PETITIONER WHICH IS AN NBFC, REGISTERED UNDER CHAPTER III-B OF THE RBI ACT AND ETC. W.P.NO.7508/2012 BETWEEN: INDIA INFOLINE FINANCE LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS INDIA INFOLINE INVESTMENT … AS ACCUSED NO.1, FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 3 OF KARNATAKA PROHIBITION OF CHARGING EXORBITANT INTEREST ACT, 2004 AND SECTION 420 OF IPC, 1860, PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE 1ST ADDITIONAL CMM COURT, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,

Manager vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

CHARGING EXORBITANT INTEREST ACT, 2004" AS BEING NOT APPLICABLE TO THE PETITIONER WHICH IS AN NBFC, REGISTERED UNDER CHAPTER III-B OF THE RBI ACT AND ETC. W.P.NO.7508/2012 BETWEEN: INDIA INFOLINE FINANCE LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS INDIA INFOLINE INVESTMENT … OF THE KARNATAKA MONEY LENDERS ACT, 1961 AND SECTION 3 OF THE KARNATAKA PROHIBITION OF CHARGING EXORBITANT INTEREST ACT, 2004 PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE VI ADDITIONAL CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE COURT, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BENGALURU CITY.THIS PETITION COMING