Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: finance act 2003 section 99 · Page 1 of about 1,838 results (0.062 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 26 2014

Bangalore Turf Club Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-26-2014

Subject : Direct Taxation

Minister made a speech on the Floor of Parliament making it explicitly clear and indicating thereunder that by Finance Act , 1986 Section115BB has been inserted to provide gross winnings from lotteries, crossword puzzles, races including horse races … (5) Declare that Stake Money paid by the petitioner cannot be construed as winnings from games as per Section 194B of the Act. (6) Declare that the correct provision applicable in the present case is the Board

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 30 2004

Nayek Paper Converters Vs. Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata

Decided on : Nov-30-2004

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2005)93ITD144(Kol.)

to existing comprehensive scrutiny. However, the concept of limited scrutiny has now been done away with by the Finance Act, 2003 w.e.f. 1.6.2003.13. On bare reading of the provisions of Clause (i) Sub-section (2) of Section 143 as effective

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 29 2005

Swaraj Engines Ltd. Vs. J.C.i.T., Spl. Range-1

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chandigarh

Decided on : Jun-29-2005

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2005)98TTJ(Chd.)346

existing business.6. The ld. D.R., on the other hand, contended that Section 36(1)(iii) has been amended by the Finance Act, 2003 w.e.f. 1.4.2004 and it has been specifically provided that interest from the date on which the capital was

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 19 2004

Mangilal Rameshwarlal Soni (Huf) Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jodhpur

Decided on : Mar-19-2004

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2004)83TTJ(Jodh.)770

view of the amended Clause (c) of Section 158BB of the IT Act, 1961 as inserted by the Finance Act, 2002 w.e.f. 1st July, 1995? (iv) Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, there was any … the Hon'ble High Court restored the matter in controversy back to the Tribunal by order dt. 16th July, 2003. The operative part of the decision of High Court is reproduced as under: "It appears that both the … High Court in the case of Vijay Kumar Jain v. CIT (1975) 99 ITR 349 (P&H) held as under: "The matter has been put beyond

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 29 2004

Assam Brook Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Nov-29-2004

Subject : ExciseCivil

Acts : Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 3 and 5A; Additional Duty of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957; Additional Duties of Excise (Textile and Textile Articles) Act, 1978; Finance Act, 1978 - Sections 32(4); Finance Act, 2002; Finance Act, 2003 - Sections 157 and 157(3); Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 8 and 8(1); Punjab Sales Tax Act

way of surcharge, at the rate of Rs. 1 per kg. was introduced by Section 157 of the Finance Act, 2003. The duty imposed, thereafter, was included in the First Schedule to the Tariff Act of 1985. The demand … which perhaps, stands undisputed in view of the refund already granted in terms of the Notification No. 33/ 99. Nothing has also been pleaded or argued on behalf of the Union to enable the Court to come

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 21 2007

Glaxo Smith Kline Consumer Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chandigarh

Decided on : Mar-21-2007

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2007)112TTJ(Chd.)94

treated as capital in nature. Thirdly, the AO noted that the amendment under Section 36(1)(iii) made by the Finance Act, 2003 w.e.f. 1st April, 2004 provided that interest from the date on which the capital was borrowed for acquisition

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 18 2011

Dharampal Satyapal Limited. Vs. Union of India

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Mar-18-2011

Subject : Education

negative list of ineligible industries in furtherance of such objective. It also referred to Section 154 of the Finance Act,2003 read with Schedule IX thereto vis-a-vis the products enumerated therein to and also sought to reinforce its stand

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 03 2006

Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. Vs. Additional Commissioner of

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Decided on : Feb-03-2006

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2006)100TTJ(Delhi)1

144 : (2005) 92ITD 1 (Del) where it has been held that the amendment carried out by the Finance Act, 2003 is clarificatory in nature. After the amendment no disallowance for late payment can be made even if the … April, 1986. The DoT in exercise of the power of the Central Government conferred under Sub-section (2) of Section 4 of the Indian Telegraph Act, granted licence vide letter No. 1-101/85-MTAC/PHB, dt. 27th March, 1986, to establish,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 11 2008

income Tax Officer Vs. Ekta Promoters (P) Ltd.

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Decided on : Jul-11-2008

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2008)117TTJ(Delhi)289

Section 234D 7. He submitted that Section 234D was introduced in Chapter XVII in the Act by the Finance Act, 2003. To advance his arguments, he referred to the scheme of the Act as laid down in the various

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 25 2008

Chandi Ram and ors. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-25-2008

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2008)217CTR(P& H)113; [2009]312ITR139(P& H)

45(5) of the Act and Sub-section (16) of Section 155 of the Act, which were inserted by the Finance Act, 2003 w.e.f. 1st April, 2004, was considered. However, both these provisions have been taken into consideration by the learned

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial