Advanced Search Results

Gujarat Ambuja Cements Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ConstitutionService Tax

Acts : Finance Act, 2000 - Sections 116 and 117; Finance Act, 2003 - Sections 158; Service Tax Rules, 1994 - Rules 2(1); Service Tax (Amendment) Rules, 1997; Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 64(3), 65, 65(5), 65(28), 65(41), 66, 66(3), 67, 68, 68(1), 69, 69(2), 69(5), 70, 70(1), 71, 71A, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 and 94; Finance Act, 1997 - Sections 68(1A) and 84; Finance Act, 1998; Service Tax (Amendment) Rules, 1998; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 2; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 246(1); Punjab Passengers and Goods Taxation Act, 1952 - Sections 3(3); Service Tax Act, 1994

Reported in : AIR2005SC3020; (2005)4CompLJ440(SC); (2005)194CTR(SC)428; 2005(99)ECC377; 2005(182)ELT33(SC); [2005]274ITR194(SC); JT2005(Suppl3)SC389; (2005)4SCC214; 2006[3]STR608; 200

the constitutional validity of Sections 116 and 117 of the Finance Act 2000 and Section 158 of the Finance Act, 2003 by which the decision of this Court in Laghu Udyog Bharati and Anr. v. Union of India and … with the filing of returns, provisions for assessment, reopening of assessments and rectification of mistakes of assessment orders. Section 75 provides for payment of interest at the rate of one-half per cent for every month or part of

Karvy Consultants Limited Vs. Government of India

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Service Tax

Acts : Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 65(19), 66, 73(1), 75, 76, 78 and 93(1); Finance (Amendment) Act, 2003 - Sections 65(19); Finance (Amendment) Act, 2004 - Sections 65(19); Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 2; Companies Act; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2006[]STR75

cause notice dated 3-1-2005, issued by the 2nd respondent, was under the erroneous supposition that Section 65(19) of Finance Act, 2003 encompassed the nature of activity carried on by the petitioner, even prior to 10-9-2004. Petitioner also relies on … Finance Act, 1994.II. Interest should not be paid by them on the amount demanded at (I) above under Section 75 of the Finance Act, 1994.III. A penalty should not be imposed on them under Section 76 of the

Plastiblends India Limited a Company Incorporated Under the Companies ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(45), 5, 14, 28, 29, 30 to 43D, 66 to 80, 80A to 80B, 80B(5), 80C to 80U, 143(1) and 260A; Companies Act, 1956; Finance Act, 2001 - Sections 32(1); ;Finance Act, 2003 - Sections 36(1); Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 75

Reported in : 2009(111)BomLR4592; (2009)227CTR(Bom)1; [2009]318ITR352(Bom); 2010(1)MhLj526; [2009]185TAXMAN187(Bom)

in : 298 ITR 194 (SC) where it is held that the proviso inserted to Section 36(1)(iii) by Finance Act, 2003 with effect from 1-4-2004 has to be read prospectively with effect from 1-4-2004. Accordingly, Mr. Dastur submitted that … degree source as the said incentives flow from Incentive Schemes enacted by the Government of India or from Section 75 of the Customs Act, 1962. Hence, according to the Department, in the present cases, the first degree source

K. Sunil Kini Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(2),

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2006)6SOT139(Bang.)

was taxed as business income relying on clause (va) of section 28 inserted into the statute book by Finance Act, 2002, with effect from 1-4-2003.The Commissioner (Appeals), in the first appeal, had accepted the assessee's claim that the … business in any capacity for a period of 10 years. Dr. Bhaskar Kini's share of consideration was Rs. 75 lakhs. This sum was disclosed in the return of income and exemption was claimed as capital receipt. The

Asstt. Cce and ors. Vs. V. Krishna Poduval and ors.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2006)199CTR(Ker)581

to notices issued prior to the day on which the Finance Bill, 2003, receives the assent of the President-,(2) any amount paid to the credit … to show-cause why service-tax amounting to Rs. 27,425 and Rs. 33,450, respectively, along with interest as applicable under section 75, as also penalty under sections 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, should not be recovered from … disposed of by this common judgment.2. The matter relates to payment of service-tax, interest and penalty under the Finance Act, 1994, by the respondent in each of the two appeals. The revenue is the appellant in both the

Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited Vs. Maharas ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

MAHARASHTRA ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION & ORS. .…Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Indira Banerjee, J.This appeal, under Section 125 of the Electricity Act 2003, is against a judgment and order dated 27th April 2021 passed by the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity, hereinafter … It is wrong to equate LPS with carrying cost or actual cost incurred because any interest paid for finances raised cannot have any nexus to the LPS as it is not the same as a loan advanced, … (ii) 22.04.2010 Rattan India Power Ltd. 4503.26 Amravati Project 05.06.2010 (Respondent No.4) 750 (iii) 31.03.2010 Adani Power Maharashtra 1200 3.28 Tiroda Project 09.08.2010 Ltd. (Respondent

Commissioner of Service Tax Vs. Delhi Gymkhana Club Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35, 35D, 35E, 35E(5), 35G, 35H, 35L, 73, 75, 75A, 76, 77 and 78; Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 65, 66, 67 and 105; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957; Additional Duties of Excise (Textiles and Textile Articles) Act, 1978; Finance Act, 1999; Finance Act, 2003; Customs Act - Sections 129D(5); Custom and Central Excise Laws (Amendment) Act, 1988; Service Tax (Determination of Value) Rules, 2006; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : (2009)226CTR(Del)384; [2009]19STJ87(Delhi); 2009[16]STR129; [2009]22STT343; (2009)25VST285(Delhi)

provided in this Act.7. Section 35G was introduced by the Finance Act, 1999 with effect from 11.5.1999 and Finance Act, 2003 with effect from 14.5.2003. We are concerned mainly with Sub-section (1) and (2) thereof, which read as under:35G. … sum of Rs. 22,93,564/-, along with interest payable till the date of its demand under Sections 73 and 75 of the Act, was demanded by these show-cause notices. Penalty under Sections 75A, 76, 77 and 78 of

Commissioner Of Central Excise Raipur Vs. M/s Sepco Electric Power Con ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service Tax

Central Excise, Raipur to the respondent under Section 73 read with Sections 65, 66 and 68 of the Finance Act, 1994 demanding the service tax along with interest under Section 75 and for imposition of penalty under Sections … setting aside the demand of service tax by holding that during the relevant period of dispute, namely, August, 2003 to November, 2005, the respondent being a body corporate was not covered under the definition of “Consulting Engineer”.

Prithvi Associates Vs. Cce

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2005)(102)ECC531

period of limitation of five years. Notice also proposed confirmation of interest in terms of the provisions of Section 75 of the said Act, and imposition of penalty under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994 for not … demand of service tax against the appellant in terms of the provisions of section 73 (a) of the Finance Act, 1994 by invoking the longer period of limitation of five years. Notice also proposed confirmation of interest in

Karvy Consultants Ltd. Vs. the Commissioner of Customs and

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2008)10STR166

period from 1.7.2003 to 31.1.2004 on account of providing taxable services under proviso to Section 73(1) of the Finance Act 1994. Interest was demanded proposed under Section 75, penalty under Section 76 & 78 of the Finance Act