Advanced Search Results

J.K. Industries Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Customs

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - Sections 3, 8C, 9 and 9A to 9C; Customs Tariff (Amendment) Act, 1982; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 12, 15, 46, 58, 68, 72 and 129; Indian Tariff Act, 1934; Finance Act, 2003 - Sections 8B, 8C, 8(8) and 15(1); Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI), 2002; Finance Act, 2000 - Sections 9AA; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 34; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 148; Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Anti-dumping Duty on Dumped Articles and for Determination of Injury) Rules, 1995 - Rules 2, 3, 4, 5 to 17, 18, 19 and 20; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 136, 226, 227, 229 and 265

Reported in : 2005(103)ECC152; 2005(186)ELT3(Raj)

before competent authority before goods are cleared from warehouse under Section 68.35. Until Section 15(1)(b) was amended vide Finance Act, 2003, the rate of duty and valuation of tariff was to be done as per the date on which … remove goods from the bonded warehouse under proper authorisation or is otherwise deemed to be improperly removed under Section 72. Therefore, in the case where imported goods are removed without payment of Duty to a bonded warehouse, the

Commnr. of Income Tax-i, Ahmedabad Vs. Gold CoIn Health Food Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(24), 5(1), 72, 271 and 271(1); Finance Act, 2002; Wealth Tax Act - Sections 18

Reported in : (2008)218CTR(SC)359; [2008]304ITR308(SC); JT2008(9)SC312; 2008(11)SCALE492; (2008)9SCC622; 2008(2)LC1144(SC); 2008AIRSCW5841; 2008(6)Supreme1; 2008(11)SCALE492.; [2008] 12 SCR 179

income is a loss. This question has to be considered in the background of the amendment made by Finance Act, 2002 (in short `Finance Act') w.e.f. 1.4.2003 in Explanation 4 to Section 271(1)(c)(iii) of the Act. In Virtual's … It may also include carried forward loss which is required to be set up against future income under Section 72 of the Act. Therefore, the applicable law on the date of filing of the return cannot be confined

All India Federation of Tax Practitioners and ors. Vs. Union of India ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service TaxConstitution

Acts : Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 65, 65(16), 66, 67, 68, 71, 72, 73 and 83; Finance (No. 2) Act, 1998; Constitution (Eighty-eighth Amendment) Act, 2003; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 2, 3, 9C, 9D and 11B; Income Tax Act, 1961; Medicinal Act, 1955; Kerala Abkari Act; Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 60; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 100 and 142A; Uttar Pradesh Tax on Luxuries Act, 1995; Andhra Pradesh Tax on Luxuries Act, 1987; West Bengal Luxury Tax Act, 1994; Haryana Passengers and Goods Taxation Act, 1952 - Sections 3(3); Constitution of India - Articles 19(1), 245, 246, 246(1), 246(3), 248, 265, 268A, 269, 276, 276(1), 276(2), 276(3) and 366(29A)

Reported in : AIR2007SC2990; (2008)5CompLJ488(SC); (2007)211CTR(SC)449; 2007(120)ECC451; 2007LC451(SC); [2007]293ITR406(SC); JT2007(10)SC305; (2007)6MLJ1062(SC); 2007(10)SCALE178; 2007(7)SCC527

dated 22.2.2001 in Writ Petition No. 142/99 upholding the legislative competence of Parliament to levy service tax vide Finance Act, 1994 and Finance Act, 1998. According to the impugned judgment, service tax falls in Entry 97, List I … Government introduced a new Article 268A in the Constitution in the year 2003 by Constitution (Eighty- eighth Amendment) Act, 2003, which provides that taxes on services shall be charged by Union of India and shall be appropriated by … of taxable services. Section 68 dealt with collection and recovery of service tax. Section 71 dealt with assessment. Section 72 dealt with best judgment assessment. Section 73 dealt with value of taxable services escaping assessment. Section 83 inter

Gujarat Ambuja Cements Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ConstitutionService Tax

Acts : Finance Act, 2000 - Sections 116 and 117; Finance Act, 2003 - Sections 158; Service Tax Rules, 1994 - Rules 2(1); Service Tax (Amendment) Rules, 1997; Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 64(3), 65, 65(5), 65(28), 65(41), 66, 66(3), 67, 68, 68(1), 69, 69(2), 69(5), 70, 70(1), 71, 71A, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 and 94; Finance Act, 1997 - Sections 68(1A) and 84; Finance Act, 1998; Service Tax (Amendment) Rules, 1998; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 2; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 246(1); Punjab Passengers and Goods Taxation Act, 1952 - Sections 3(3); Service Tax Act, 1994

Reported in : AIR2005SC3020; (2005)4CompLJ440(SC); (2005)194CTR(SC)428; 2005(99)ECC377; 2005(182)ELT33(SC); [2005]274ITR194(SC); JT2005(Suppl3)SC389; (2005)4SCC214; 2006[3]STR608; 200

the constitutional validity of Sections 116 and 117 of the Finance Act 2000 and Section 158 of the Finance Act, 2003 by which the decision of this Court in Laghu Udyog Bharati and Anr. v. Union of India and … Central Excise Officer in the prescribed form and verified in the prescribed manner, a quarterly return. Sections 71, 72, 73 and 74 deal with the filing of returns, provisions for assessment, reopening of assessments and rectification of

Tata Sky Limited Vs. the State of Uttarakhand and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; ; Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 - Section 4; ; Indian Wireless Telegraphy Act, 1933; ; Uttar Pradesh Entertainment and Betting Tax Act, 1979 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 4A, 4A(4), 4B and 4C; ; Bombay Entertainments Duty Act, 1923; ; Uttar Pradesh Entertainment and Betting Tax (Amendment) Act, 2009; ; Finance Act, 2001 - Sections 65, 65(5), 65(13), 65(63), 65(72) and 137; ; Prasar Bharti (Broadcasting Corporation of India) Act, 1990 - Section 2; ; Finance Act, 2002 - Sections 65, 66(5), 65(14), 65(15), 65(80) and 65(90); ; Finance Act, 2003 - Section 65, 65(16), 65(95), 65(105) and 66(1); ; Finance Act, 2004; ; Finance Act, 2005 - Section 65(16) and 65(105); ; Government of India Act, 1935; ; Cable Television Networks (Regulation) Act, 1995; ; Bengal Amusements Tax Act, 1922; ; We

cent of the gross amount charged by the service provider) even under the Finance Act, 2002.19(iii). Under the Finance Act, 2003, the term 'broadcasting' was re-defined through Section 65(15), which is being extracted hereunder:65. Definitions.- In this Chapter, unless

V.G. Ramachandran Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Madras

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2006)100ITD545(Chennai)

either. It is pertinent to mention here that even while Clause (10C) has since been amended by the Finance Act, 2003, so as to make it applicable: not only to any amount "received" but also to any amount "receivable", … dated 5-9-2003, Clause '9' as reported in 263 ITR 62 (St.), page 72, which reads as under:-- Exemption of amount received under VRS compensation allowable … retirement scheme, 'VRS' subject to a limit of Rs. 5,00,000 are exempt from being charged to tax under Section 10(10C) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, even, if the payment is made in instalments and the same are

Sri V.G. Ramachandiron Vs. Income-tax Officer [Alongwith

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2006)284ITR53(Chennai)

either. It is pertinent to mention here that even while Clause (10C) has since been amended by the Finance Act, 2003, so as to make it applicable not only to any amount "received" but also to any amount "receivable", … September 2003, Clause '9' as reported in 263 ITR 62 (St.) page 72, which reads as under: Exemption of amount received under VRS compensation allowable … called as VRS) subject to a limit of Rs. 5,00,000/- are exempt from being charged to tax under Section 10(10C) of the I.T. Act, 1961, even, if the payment is made in instalments and the same are

Total Network Sl (a Company Incorporated in Spain) (Original Responden ...

Court : House of Lords

Subject : Service Tax

of the scheme of VATA 1994. First, section 77A was added by section 18(1) and (4) of the Finance Act 2003 with effect from 10 April 2003. It enables the Commissioners, where a taxable supply of goods to which … penalty to the director or managing officer where the person liable under section 60 is a body corporate. Section 72 makes it an offence for a person to be knowingly concerned in, or in the taking of steps

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Sales TaxMedia and Communication

Acts : Central Sales Tax Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 11; Constitution (46th Amendment) Act, 1982; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 32, 131, 136, 141, 226, 246(1), 248(1), 286, 366, 366(12) and 366(29A); Customs Act - Sections 2(22); Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 65(16), 65(72) and 66; Finance Act, 2002 - Sections 149(90) and 149(92); Finance Act, 2003 - Sections 159(104), 159(105), 159(110) and 159 (111); Government of India Act, 1935; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 11 and 12; Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963; Madhya Bharat Sales Tax Act, 1950; Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act - Sections 2; Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1959; Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Sections 2(7); State Sales Tax Act; Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997 - Sections 2; Telegr

Reported in : AIR2006SC1383; (2006)4CompLJ330(SC); (2006)201CTR(SC)346; [2006]282ITR273(SC); JT2006(3)SC114; 2006(2)SCALE752; (2006)3SCC1; [2006]145STC91(SC); 2006[2]STR161; [2006]152; [2006] 2 SCR 823

The liability of service providers to service tax was continued under Section 159(105)(110) (b) and (111) of the Finance Act, 2003. The definition of subscriber was added in sub Section (104) as meaning 'a person to whom any service … in several subsequent decisions of the United States. [See Fleetway, Inc. v. Public Service Interstate Transport Co. (1934) 72 F.2d 761 . State Broadcasting Co. v. United Press Intern. Inc. (1966) 369 F 2d 268 , Columbia

Lason India Pvt. Ltd. (Formerly Vs. the Income-tax Officer

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chennai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2008)301ITR306(Chennai)

Section 10B and not to the other business. He also submitted that Section 10B has been amended by Finance Act, 2002 w.e.f. 01-04-2003 and assessee is now entitled only to 90% of deduction and therefore the deduction available … eligible profits. It has been specifically provided under Clause (ii) of Section 10A/10B(6) that no loss referred under Section 72 or 74 as far as it pertains to the business of the undertaking shall be carried forward and