Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: finance act 2003 section 69 · Page 1 of about 1,595 results (0.060 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 17 2005

Gujarat Ambuja Cements Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-17-2005

Subject : ConstitutionService Tax

Acts : Finance Act, 2000 - Sections 116 and 117; Finance Act, 2003 - Sections 158; Service Tax Rules, 1994 - Rules 2(1); Service Tax (Amendment) Rules, 1997; Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 64(3), 65, 65(5), 65(28), 65(41), 66, 66(3), 67, 68, 68(1), 69, 69(2), 69(5), 70, 70(1), 71, 71A, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 and 94; Finance Act, 1997 - Sections 68(1A) and 84; Finance Act, 1998; Service Tax (Amendment) Rules, 1998; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 2; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 246(1); Punjab Passengers and Goods Taxation Act, 1952 - Sections 3(3); Service Tax Act, 1994

Reported in : AIR2005SC3020; (2005)4CompLJ440(SC); (2005)194CTR(SC)428; 2005(99)ECC377; 2005(182)ELT33(SC); [2005]274ITR194(SC); JT2005(Suppl3)SC389; (2005)4SCC214; 2006[3]STR608; 200

the constitutional validity of Sections 116 and 117 of the Finance Act 2000 and Section 158 of the Finance Act, 2003 by which the decision of this Court in Laghu Udyog Bharati and Anr. v. Union of India and … insurance business. Section 68 required every person providing taxable service to collect the service tax at specified rates. Section 69 of the Finance Act, 1994 provided for the registration of the persons responsible for collecting service tax. Sub-sections

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 30 2007

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Mangalam Cement Ltd.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : May-30-2007

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2007)7STR673

the constitutional validity of Sections 116 and 117 of the Finance Act, 2000 and Section 158 of the Finance Act, 2003 as well as Section 71A of the Finance Act, 1994, therefore, the matter was subjudice. The Hon'ble the … provided to him, to the credit of the Central Government. Notwithstanding anything contained in the provisions of Sections 69 and 70, the provisions thereof shall not apply to a person referred to in the proviso to Sub-section

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 22 2006

Greenply Industries Ltd. Vs. Cce

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Feb-22-2006

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2006)(111)ECC151

recourse to retrospective amendments.7. Having noticed the loophole in the provisions, a further amendment was brought by the Finance Act, 2003. Section 158 of the Finance Act, 2003 retrospectively amended the Section 68 and sought to insert a new Section … 1997, namely: 71A. Filing of return by certain customers - Notwithstanding anything contained in the provisions of Sections 69 and 70, the provisions there of shall not apply to a person referred to in the proviso to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 22 2006

Mount Shivalik Industries Ltd. Vs. Cce and C

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Feb-22-2006

Subject : Service Tax

recourse to retrospective amendments.6. Having noticed the loophole in the provisions, a further amendment was brought by the Finance Act, 2003. Section 158 of the Finance Act, 2003 retrospectively amended the Section 68 and sought to insert a new Section … July, 1997, namely: 71A. Filing of return by certain customers -Notwithstanding anything contained in the provisions of Sections 69 and 70, the provisions there of shall not apply to a person referred to in the proviso to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 27 2005

Nava Bharat Ferro Alloys Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-27-2005

Subject : Service Tax

Acts : Finance Act, 2000 - Sections 65(7), 65(18A), 65(18B), 65(48), 116 and 117; Finance Act, 1997; Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 65, 66 68, 70, 71A and 94; Finance Act, 2003 - Sections 68, 68(1), 69, 70, 71 and 71A; Assam Taxation (On Goods Carried by Road or on Inland Waterways) Act; Central Tea Act - Sections 3(1) and 3(2); Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 43, 43(1), 43(1A) and 44; Rajasthan Passengers and Goods Taxation Act, 1959 - Sections 3 and 4; Karnataka Entertainments Tax Act, 1958 - Sections 2; Expenditure Tax Act, 1987; British North America Act, 1867 - Sections 91 and 92; Finance Act, 1998 - Sections 65, 65(16), 65(17), 65(41) and 66(3); Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 2; Finance Act, 1997 - Sections 84; Service Tax Rules, 1994 - Rule 2 and 2(1); Service Tax (Amendm

Reported in : (2005)186CTR(AP)451; 2005(185)ELT236(AP); 2006[3]STR565

of tax, but extended the time to file returns till 28.11.2003. Further amendments however, were carried out in Finance Act, 2003 in order to validate the imposition of tax from 16.7.1997 to 2.6.1998 and to remove the basic infirmities … to this argument, it is necessary to reproduce the amendments that were affected to the Finance Act in 2003. Section 68 in 2003 Act reads as under:Section 68 : Payment of service tax.-Provided that-(i) in relation to services … as under:Section 71A : 'Notwithstanding anything contained in the provisions of Sections 69 and 70, the provisions thereof shall not apply to a person referred

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 12 2006

JaIn Bidi Udyog and ors. Vs. Cce

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Oct-12-2006

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2006)(113)ECC453

2003. These show cause notices were issued to the appellants subsequent to the amendment carried out by the Finance Act, 2003. I find that this very issue was under consideration of the Division Bench of the Tribunal in the … affect. These provisions will have effect for the period from 16.7.97 to 16.10.98. Following are the relevant amendments. Section 69 as amended reads as follows: Section 68(1) Every person providing taxable service to any person shall pay service

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 01 2004

L.H. Sugar Factories Ltd. and ors. Vs. Cce

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Jan-01-2004

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2004)(93)ECC224

But the appeals cannot be closed on the above basis in view of subsequent amendment brought under the Finance Act 2003 with retrospective affect. These provisions will have effect for the period from 16.7.97 to 16.10.98 Following are the … affect. These provisions will have effect for the period from 16.7.97 to 16.10.98 Following are the relevant amendments. Section 69 as amended read as follows: - "Section 68 (1) Every person providing taxable service to any person shall

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 08 2006

Unikeller India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Cce

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Jun-08-2006

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2006)(110)ECC467

tax under Section 68 was to be made only by the service provider. After the retrospective amendment in Finance Act, 2003, the receiver of the services from G.T.O. was also made liable to pay service tax. Since the calculation … the receiver of services of G.T.O. to file returns. This insertion was necessitated as the provisions of Sections 69 & 70 of Finance Act, 1994 applied only to service provider. By inserting Section 71A, the Finance Act,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 14 2006

Ginni International Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Jun-14-2006

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2007)6STT491

tax under Section 68 was to be made only by the service provider. After the retrospective amendment in Finance Act, 2003, the receiver of the services from G.T.O. was also made liable to pay service tax. Since the calculation … the receiver of services of G.T.O. to file returns. This insertion was necessitated as the provisions of Sections 69 and 70 of Finance Act, 1994 applied only to service provider. By inserting Section 71A, the Finance Act,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 26 2006

Vanasthali Textiles Industries Vs. Commr. of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Jul-26-2006

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2007)8STT329

tax under Section 68 was to be made only by the service provider. After the retrospective amendment in Finance Act, 2003, the receiver of the services from G.T.O. was also made liable to pay service tax. Since the calculation … the receiver of services of G.T.O. to file returns. This insertion was necessitated as the provisions of Sections 69 and 70 of Finance Act, 1994 applied only to service provider. By inserting Section 71A, the Finance Act,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial