Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: finance act 2003 section 41 · Page 1 of about 2,352 results (0.096 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 08 2008

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Ahmedabad Vs. Core Health Care Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-08-2008

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 28 to 41, 43, 43(1), 80HH, 80I, 90(2) and 260A; Finance Act, 1986 - Sections 43(1); Finance Act, 2003

Reported in : 105(2008)CLT433(SC); (2008)215CTR(SC)1; [2008]298ITR194(SC); JT2008(2)SC367; 2008(2)SCALE327; (2008)2SCC465; 2008AIRSCW1425

proviso has since been inserted in Section 36(1)(iii) of the 1961 Act. That proviso has been inserted by Finance Act, 2003 w.e.f. 1.4.2004. Hence, the said proviso will not apply to the facts of the present case. Further, in … Section. 43(1) has relevancy in relation to Section 32(depreciation allowance); Section 32A(investment allowance), Section 33(development rebate allowance), and Section 41 (balancing charge). 'Actual cost' of an asset has no relevancy in relation to Section 36(1)(iii) of the 1961

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 22 2005

Sedco Forex International Inc. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Uttaranchal

Decided on : Jul-22-2005

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 28 to 41, 42, 43, 43A, 44BB, 44D, 90, 90(1), 115A, 244BB, 260A and 293A; Finance Act, 1987; Finance Act, 2003 - Sections 44AA, 44AA(2), 44AB, 44BB, 44BB(2), 44BB(3), 143 and 143(3)

Reported in : (2005)198CTR(Uttranchal)364; [2005]279ITR1(Uttaranchal)

mineral oils outside India.'The following Sub-Section (3) shall be inserted after Sub-section (2) of Section 44BB by the Finance Act, 2003, w.e.f. 1st April, 2004 :'(3) Notwithstanding anything contained in Sub-section (1), an assessee may claim lower profits and … the business of exploration, etc., of mineral oils.--(1) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in Sections 28 to 41 and Sections 43 and 43A, in the case of an assessee, being a non-resident, engaged in the business

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 17 2005

Gujarat Ambuja Cements Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-17-2005

Subject : ConstitutionService Tax

Acts : Finance Act, 2000 - Sections 116 and 117; Finance Act, 2003 - Sections 158; Service Tax Rules, 1994 - Rules 2(1); Service Tax (Amendment) Rules, 1997; Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 64(3), 65, 65(5), 65(28), 65(41), 66, 66(3), 67, 68, 68(1), 69, 69(2), 69(5), 70, 70(1), 71, 71A, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 and 94; Finance Act, 1997 - Sections 68(1A) and 84; Finance Act, 1998; Service Tax (Amendment) Rules, 1998; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 2; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 246(1); Punjab Passengers and Goods Taxation Act, 1952 - Sections 3(3); Service Tax Act, 1994

Reported in : AIR2005SC3020; (2005)4CompLJ440(SC); (2005)194CTR(SC)428; 2005(99)ECC377; 2005(182)ELT33(SC); [2005]274ITR194(SC); JT2005(Suppl3)SC389; (2005)4SCC214; 2006[3]STR608; 200

the constitutional validity of Sections 116 and 117 of the Finance Act 2000 and Section 158 of the Finance Act, 2003 by which the decision of this Court in Laghu Udyog Bharati and Anr. v. Union of India and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 10 2018

Kirloskar Electric Co Ltd Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-10-2018

Subject : Land Acquisition

Counsel for Mr. T. Suryanarayana, Advocate) And:1. The State of Karnataka Represented herein by the Principal Secretary - Finance Department, Government of Karnataka Vidhana Soudha, Bengaluru-560 001. …Petitioner 2. Date of Judgment 10-01-2018 W.P.Nos.58917-58928/2016 and Connected Matters … passed by the 2nd Respondent under Section 39(1) read with Section 36(1) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, for the tax periods April 2009 to March 2010 are ex facie illegal and unsustainable & etc., W.P.Nos.26349-26360/2017: … Vs. The State of Karnataka & Ors. Peenya 2nd Stage, Bangalore-560 058. 41/123 (By Mr. A.S.Ponnanna, Addl. Advocate General a/w Mr. T.K.Vedamurthy, AGA) ... Respondents

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 24 2006

industrial Finance Corpn. of Vs. Joint/Additional Commissioner

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Decided on : Feb-24-2006

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2006)99ITD639(Delhi)

129.0618 crores created during the year. The assessee argued that provisions of Section 41(4A) were inserted by the Finance Act, 1997 w.e.f. 1-4-1998 only. The learned Assessing Officer held that by merely showing first the amount of Rs.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 17 2006

Commissioner of Income Tax-i Vs. Vardhman Polytex Ltd.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Aug-17-2006

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 28 to 41, 43, 43(1) and 143(1); Finance Act, 1986; Income Tax Act, 1922; Finance Act, 2003

Reported in : (2006)205CTR(P& H)457

36(1)(iii) or 37 cannot be claimed which stands clarified by the insertion of the proviso therein under the Finance Act, 2003. As such the assessee cannot claim any benefit of Section 36(1)(iii) or Section 37 in this case. The … of certain terms relevant to income from profits and gains of business or profession.43. In Sections 28 to 41 and in this section, unless the context otherwise requires-(1) 'actual cost' means the actual cost of the assets

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 17 2007

National Dairy Development Board Vs. Additional Commissioner of

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

Decided on : Aug-17-2007

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2008)114TTJ(Ahd.)145

the assessment year under consideration. The learned Counsel then referred to Explanatory Notes on the provisions of the Finance Act, 2003, relevant extract of which reads as under: 31.1 Entities that are created under an Act of Parliament have … appellant, the expenditure so claimed against such disbursements could always be reversed in view of the provisions of Section 41(1) of the Act is not tenable because such provisions can be exercised for loss, expenditure or trading liability

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 25 2015

M/S Wipro Limited Vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-25-2015

Subject : Direct Taxation

of income tax in both the countries was sine qua non. However, by the amendment made by the Finance Act 2003, the benefit of granting the relief was extended to even in respect of income tax chargeable under the … Act. The said definition is for the purpose of Section 28 to 41. But the said meaning of the word can be imported for Section … …RESPONDENT (By Sri E.R.Indrakumar, Senior Counsel for Sri K.V.Aravind, Adv.) - 2 - This I.T.A. is filed under Section 260-A of I.T.Act, 1961 arising out of order dated 30.05.2008 passed in ITA No.468/BNG/2006, for the assessment year

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 09 2010

M/S.Malaysian Airlines. M/S.Saudi Arabian Airlines. and ors Vs. the Un ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-09-2010

Subject : Service Tax

Acts : Constitution Of India - Article 226

of the Finance Act, 1979 in particular engrafted in sections 33 to 41. In their submission, subsection (1) of section 35 is a charging section … under Article 226 of the Constitution of India are challenging imposition of penalty under section 38(3) of the Finance Act, 1979 ("Finance Act" or "Act" for short) for delay in payment of Foreign Travel Tax ("FTT" for short) … the petitioner furnished bank guarantees for the amounts involved. The Commissioner (Appeals), vide his order dated 15th January, 2003, dismissed these appeals of the petitioner and upheld the orderinoriginal.4. Aggrieved by the orderinappeal, the petitioner invoked revisional

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 01 2008

Gurcharan Singh Vs. Directorate of Revenue Intelligence

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-01-2008

Subject : CustomsCriminal

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 2, 2(33), 2(41), 8, 11, 13, 50, 76, 77, 104, 111, 113, 123, 132, 135, 135(1), 135B, 136 and 136(1); Customs (Amendment) Act, 2003; Finance Act, 2003 - Sections 109; Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - Sections 14, 14(1), 15 and 18; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 482; Finance (No. 2) Act, 1991; Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Rules, 1993 - Rule 11

Reported in : 2008(1)ALD(Cri)968; 2008CriLJ2238; 2008(128)ECC5; 2008(154)LC5(SC); 2008(224)ELT497(SC); JT2008(4)SC383; 2008(4)SCALE403; 2008AIRSCW2280; 2008(2)AICLR821; 2008(3)Supreme28

entry of goods which was even otherwise covered. It is in that contingency that Section 109 of the Finance Act, 2003 provided:109. In Section 113 of the Customs Act, -(a) in Clauses (c), (e), (f), (g) and (h), the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial