Advanced Search Results

Checkmate Services P Ltd Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax-i

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

cash, the sum has been realised within fifteen days from the due date." By Section 21 of the Finance Act, 2003, the above second proviso was omitted. Thereafter, by Finance Act, 2021 the following Explanation 5 was added, w.e.f. … why every assessee(s) 16 M.M. Aqua Technologies Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi, 2021 SCC OnLine SC575 24 [employer(s)]. was entitled to deduction even prior to 1-4-1984, on mercantile system of accounting as a business expenditure

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Aimil Limited

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(24), 28, 36(1), 43B and 139(1); Finance Act, 2003; Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948; Constitution of India - Article 141

Reported in : (2010)229CTR(Del)418

of return, no disallowance could be made in view of the provisions of Section 43B, as amended vide Finance Act, 2003, he still confirmed the addition made by the AO on the ground that no documentary proof was given … taken by the Kerala High Court in the case of CIT v. South India Corporation Ltd. : (2000) 242 ITR 114. After noting the said judgment the fact that the amendments had been made to the provisions

Commissioner of Income Tax Kolkata-iii Vs. Alom Extrusions Limited

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(24), 28, 36(1), 43B and 139(1); Finance Act, 2003; Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948; Finance Act, 1988; Finance Act, 1989; Provident Fund Act; Finance Act, 1983

Reported in : (2009)227CTR(SC)417; [2009]319ITR306(SC); JT2009(14)SC441; 2009(14)SCALE163; (2010)1SCC489; [2009]185TAXMAN416(SC)

whether omission [deletion] of the second proviso to Section 43B of the Income Tax Act, 1961, by the Finance Act, 2003, operated with effect from 1st April, 2004, or whether it operated retrospectively with effect from 1st April, 19884.

Western Electricity Co. of Orissa Vs. Sarat Chandra Mohanty, General

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Electricity

Reported in : (2007)LCAPTEL626

the first Respondent herein, where he sought for an action under Section 19 or 24 of the Electricity Act, 2003 against the DISCOM. (i) To set aside the Impugned Order dated 27^th January, 2006 passed by the OERC … of the holding company. There is a failure on the part of Reliance Energy Ltd. to obtain further finances to meet the financial requirements of the DISCOMS. By non-assigning of the share holders' agreement, the REL has

M/S Atria Convergence Technologies Ltd vs Deputy Commissioner of Comme ...

Court : Karnataka

The vehement submission of the Assessees thatthey have paid service tax as Cable Operator Services u/s.65(105)(zs) of the Finance Act, 1994 and therefore the same charges cannot be subjected to VAT under 2003 Act, appears attractive at the … B BLOCK, BMTC BUILDING, BENGALURU 560 047. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. ADITYA VIKRAM BHAT., AGA) THIS STRP FILED UNDER SECTION 65(1) OF THE KARNATAKA VALUE ADDED TAX ACT, 2003 AGAINST THEJUDGMENT DATED 31.07.2023 PASSED IN STA No.56 TOTRIBUNAL … 289/2019, KARNATAKA APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT BENGALURU,DISMISSING THE APPEALS AND CONFIRMING THE ORDERDATED 24.09.2019 PASSED IN VAT AP.03/2018-19, VATAP.04/2018-19, VAT AP.128/2018-19, VAT AP.82/2018-19 AND VAT AP.129/2018-19

The Commissioner of Income Tax-v Vs. P.M. Electronics Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(24), 36(1), 36(1)(5A), 43, 43B, 139(1), 143(1)(A), 143(2) and 260A; Employees Provident Fund Act; Finance Act, 2003; Constitution of India - Article 141; Employees Provident Fund Rules

Reported in : (2008)220CTR(Del)635; [2009]313ITR161(Delhi); [2009]177TAXMAN1(Delhi)

ITD 1 Delhi, has taken the view that the amendment brought about in Section 43B by virtue of Finance Act, 2003 was curative in nature and hence applicable retrospectively. In other words, the Tribunal held that the assessee would

M/S Fortious Infradevelopers Llp vs the Additional Commissioner of

Court : Karnataka

GANDHINAGAR, BANGALORE-560 001.2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES (AUDIT)-1.1, DGSTO-1, YESHWANTHPURA, BENGALURU-560 022. -2-3. THE UNDER SECRETARY FINANCE DEPARTMENT (C.T-1), KARNATAKA GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.ADITYA VIKRAM BHAT.,AGA FOR R1-R3) THIS STA … 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.ADITYA VIKRAM BHAT.,AGA FOR R1-R3) THIS STA FILED UNDER SECTION 66(1) OF KARNATAKAVALUE ADDED TAX ACT 2003 AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 12.10.2022 PASSED IN ORDER No.ZAC-1/BNG/SMR-25/202122 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL … Interest Penalty Total demand 18/ CAS order no. April 2016 2,48,97,811 2,67,58,610 24,89,784 5,41,46,205 2022 398438333 AD SMR to March dated 12.10.2022 2017 19/ CAS

Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation Vs. C ...

Court : UK Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

such cases: para 260. It was not open to the Revenue to rely on section 320 of the Finance Act 2004 ("Section 320 FA 2004") or section 107 of the Finance Act 2007 ("Section 107 FA 2007") to … are concerned was established by a group litigation order on 8 October 2003. The test claimants are all companies which belong to groups which have … from six to three years, in addition eliminated the special advantage for claims in mistake previously introduced by section 24(5) of the Finance Act 1989, delaying the commencement of the limitation period for such claims until the claimants

Bangalore Turf Club Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Direct Taxation

and other game of any sort" as defined under section 194B of the Act. 38. Sub-clause (ix) of sub-section (24) of section 2 was inserted by the Finance Act, 1972, with effect from 01.04.1972. A perusal of the … Minister made a speech on the Floor of Parliament making it explicitly clear and indicating thereunder that by Finance Act , 1986 Section115BB has been inserted to provide gross winnings from lotteries, crossword puzzles, races including horse races

The Income Tax Officer, Vs. Urban Improvement Trust

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

2018 - The Income Tax Officer Vs. M/s. Urban Improvement Trust, Kota.4. Section 10(20) has been amended by Finance Act, 2002 w.e.f. 01.04.2003. A Notice under Section 142(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as … of the assessee that Urban Improvement Trust - the assessee is a municipality within the meaning of Article 243P of the Constitution of India, hence it is not required to file an income tax return. Assessing Officer