Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: finance act 2003 section 160 · Page 1 of about 486 results (0.079 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 06 2007

Cce Vs. Jaiswal Equipment and Holdings

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Jun-06-2007

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2007)7STR665

in any judgment, decree or order of any Court, Tribunal or other authority. By Section 160(1) of the Finance Act, 2003, it was provided in the context of the Notification dated 05.11.1997, that it will stand amended as specified

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 18 2006

Rajasthan Textiles Mills Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Jan-18-2006

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2007)9STT528

dated 5-11-1997. He submits that the said Notification was amended with retrospective effect by Section 160(1) of the Finance Act, 2003 and by virtue of this amendment, they are eligible for the refund claim.4. The learned DR, on the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 04 2005

Commr. of C. Ex. and Customs Vs. Nilachal Concrete Products (P)

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Decided on : Mar-04-2005

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2006)STR48

tax.He further submits that consequent upon retrospective amendment as per Section 160 read with 12th Schedule of the Finance Act, 2003, the Notification No. 43/97-S.T., dated 5-11-1997 has been amended with retrospective effect from 16th November, 1997 to 1st

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 01 2006

Commissioner of C. Ex. Vs. Indian Ispat Works (P) Ltd.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Feb-01-2006

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2006)(105)ECC128

same was not payable by the respondent. The respondents contention, it seems were correct, as Section 160 of Finance Act, 2003, amends the Notification No. 43/97-ST retrospectively, in other words the respondents were not taxable for the Service availed

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 26 2006

Kec International Ltd. Vs. Cce

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Jul-26-2006

Subject : Service Tax

limited company,"; The above notification was amended by the twelfth schedule issued under Section 160 (1) of the Finance Act, 2003 which reads as under: 8. It is the contention of the appellant that they would fall under the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 29 2006

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Padam Prakash (Huf)

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Decided on : Sep-29-2006

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2006)104TTJ(Delhi)989

care of by insertion of Clause (c) to Sub-section (5). The said clause no doubt was inserted by Finance Act, 2003 w.e.f. 1st April, 2004, but it has to be taken to be declaratory in character. In a given … or not, obtained by any representative assessee mentioned in Clause (iii) or Clause (iv) of Sub-section (1) of Section 160 or by any person on whose behalf or for whose benefit any income is receivable by the representative

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 25 2022

Dhanalaxmi Bank Ltd vs K.N.Madhusoodanan

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Oct-25-2022

NAICKANAL JUNCTION, THRISSUR, PIN - 680001 13 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA THROUGH ITS MANAGER, 6TH FLOOR, FINANCE TOWER, KALOOR, KOCHI, KERALA, PIN - 682017 14 REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES THROUGH THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR, COMPANY LAW BHAWAN, … is whether the rejection of the nomination of the writ petitioners for the directorship of the appellant under Section 160 of the Companies Act, 2013 by the appellant bank, allegedly being a statutory violation, is a subject matter

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 25 2022

Dhanlaxmi Bank Ltd vs P.K. Vijayakumar @ Puthalathkuttan Nair Vijayaku ...

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Oct-25-2022

NAICKANAL JUNCTION, THRISSUR, PIN - 680001 13 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA THROUGH ITS MANAGER, 6TH FLOOR, FINANCE TOWER, KALOOR, KOCHI, KERALA, PIN - 682017 14 REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES THROUGH THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR, COMPANY LAW BHAWAN, … is whether the rejection of the nomination of the writ petitioners for the directorship of the appellant under Section 160 of the Companies Act, 2013 by the appellant bank, allegedly being a statutory violation, is a subject matter

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 07 2012

Malad Kokil Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. and Another Vs. the Mode ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-07-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

as laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Reserve Bank of India v/s. Peerless General Finance and Investment Co. Ltd. and ors. {AIR 1987 SCC 1023}, the Court will have to draw a distinction … trial Judge has totally misinterpreted the so called settlement dated 30th August, 2003. The learned Counsel submits that the said settlement has to be read … Limaye v. Nilkanth Ganesh Pethe, 2010 (4) Mh.L.J. 160; Grand Paradi Co-op.Hsg.Society Ltd. v. Mont Blanc Properties … It is the contention of the plaintiff-society that after they pursued the matter under the Right to Information Act, they came to know about the Commencement Certificate granted in favour of the defendants by the Corporation on … in the property within the period mentioned in the agreement executed under Section 4 of the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963 (hereinafter referred to as

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 16 2006

Kwality Milk Foods Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Madras

Decided on : Mar-16-2006

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2006)100ITD199(Chennai)

has constituted this Special Bench to consider the following question: Whether amendment in proviso to Section 43B by Finance Act, 2003 could be construed to be curative, as such retrospective in nature? 2. We have heard the rival submissions … ITR (St.) 31, 32] and the Memorandum Explaining the provisions in the Finance Bill, 1983 [140 ITR (St.) 160], it was stated that Section 43B was clearly aimed at curbing the activities of those taxpayers, who did

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial