Advanced Search Results
Cce Vs. Jaiswal Equipment and Holdings
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Jun-06-2007
Service Tax
(2007)7STR665
in any judgment, decree or order of any Court, Tribunal or other authority. By Section 160(1) of the Finance Act, 2003, it was provided in the context of the Notification dated 05.11.1997, that it will stand amended as specified
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRajasthan Textiles Mills Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Jan-18-2006
Service Tax
(2007)9STT528
dated 5-11-1997. He submits that the said Notification was amended with retrospective effect by Section 160(1) of the Finance Act, 2003 and by virtue of this amendment, they are eligible for the refund claim.4. The learned DR, on the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommr. of C. Ex. and Customs Vs. Nilachal Concrete Products (P)
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta
Mar-04-2005
Service Tax
(2006)STR48
tax.He further submits that consequent upon retrospective amendment as per Section 160 read with 12th Schedule of the Finance Act, 2003, the Notification No. 43/97-S.T., dated 5-11-1997 has been amended with retrospective effect from 16th November, 1997 to 1st
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Commissioner of C. Ex. Vs. Indian Ispat Works (P) Ltd.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Feb-01-2006
Service Tax
(2006)(105)ECC128
same was not payable by the respondent. The respondents contention, it seems were correct, as Section 160 of Finance Act, 2003, amends the Notification No. 43/97-ST retrospectively, in other words the respondents were not taxable for the Service availed
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKec International Ltd. Vs. Cce
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Jul-26-2006
Service Tax
limited company,"; The above notification was amended by the twelfth schedule issued under Section 160 (1) of the Finance Act, 2003 which reads as under: 8. It is the contention of the appellant that they would fall under the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDeputy Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Padam Prakash (Huf)
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi
Sep-29-2006
Direct Taxation
(2006)104TTJ(Delhi)989
care of by insertion of Clause (c) to Sub-section (5). The said clause no doubt was inserted by Finance Act, 2003 w.e.f. 1st April, 2004, but it has to be taken to be declaratory in character. In a given … or not, obtained by any representative assessee mentioned in Clause (iii) or Clause (iv) of Sub-section (1) of Section 160 or by any person on whose behalf or for whose benefit any income is receivable by the representative
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDhanalaxmi Bank Ltd vs K.N.Madhusoodanan
Kerala
Oct-25-2022
NAICKANAL JUNCTION, THRISSUR, PIN - 680001 13 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA THROUGH ITS MANAGER, 6TH FLOOR, FINANCE TOWER, KALOOR, KOCHI, KERALA, PIN - 682017 14 REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES THROUGH THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR, COMPANY LAW BHAWAN, … is whether the rejection of the nomination of the writ petitioners for the directorship of the appellant under Section 160 of the Companies Act, 2013 by the appellant bank, allegedly being a statutory violation, is a subject matter
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDhanlaxmi Bank Ltd vs P.K. Vijayakumar @ Puthalathkuttan Nair Vijayaku ...
Kerala
Oct-25-2022
NAICKANAL JUNCTION, THRISSUR, PIN - 680001 13 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA THROUGH ITS MANAGER, 6TH FLOOR, FINANCE TOWER, KALOOR, KOCHI, KERALA, PIN - 682017 14 REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES THROUGH THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR, COMPANY LAW BHAWAN, … is whether the rejection of the nomination of the writ petitioners for the directorship of the appellant under Section 160 of the Companies Act, 2013 by the appellant bank, allegedly being a statutory violation, is a subject matter
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMalad Kokil Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. and Another Vs. the Mode ...
Mumbai
Sep-07-2012
Land Acquisition
as laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Reserve Bank of India v/s. Peerless General Finance and Investment Co. Ltd. and ors. {AIR 1987 SCC 1023}, the Court will have to draw a distinction … trial Judge has totally misinterpreted the so called settlement dated 30th August, 2003. The learned Counsel submits that the said settlement has to be read … Limaye v. Nilkanth Ganesh Pethe, 2010 (4) Mh.L.J. 160; Grand Paradi Co-op.Hsg.Society Ltd. v. Mont Blanc Properties … It is the contention of the plaintiff-society that after they pursued the matter under the Right to Information Act, they came to know about the Commencement Certificate granted in favour of the defendants by the Corporation on … in the property within the period mentioned in the agreement executed under Section 4 of the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963 (hereinafter referred to as
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKwality Milk Foods Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Madras
Mar-16-2006
Direct Taxation
(2006)100ITD199(Chennai)
has constituted this Special Bench to consider the following question: Whether amendment in proviso to Section 43B by Finance Act, 2003 could be construed to be curative, as such retrospective in nature? 2. We have heard the rival submissions … ITR (St.) 31, 32] and the Memorandum Explaining the provisions in the Finance Bill, 1983 [140 ITR (St.) 160], it was stated that Section 43B was clearly aimed at curbing the activities of those taxpayers, who did
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »