Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: finance act 2003 section 157 · Page 1 of about 351 results (0.041 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 29 2004

Assam Brook Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Nov-29-2004

Subject : ExciseCivil

Acts : Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 3 and 5A; Additional Duty of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957; Additional Duties of Excise (Textile and Textile Articles) Act, 1978; Finance Act, 1978 - Sections 32(4); Finance Act, 2002; Finance Act, 2003 - Sections 157 and 157(3); Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 8 and 8(1); Punjab Sales Tax Act

way of surcharge, at the rate of Rs. 1 per kg. was introduced by Section 157 of the Finance Act, 2003. The duty imposed, thereafter, was included in the First Schedule to the Tariff Act of 1985. The demand

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 17 2009

Maruti Suzuki Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi-iii

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-17-2009

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; CENVAT Credit Rules, 2002 - Rules 2, 3(1), 6, 6(1) and 14; Additional Duties of Excise (Textile and Textile Articles) Act, 1978 - Sections 3, 3(2), 4 and 4(2); Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957 - Sections 3; Finance Act, 2001 - Sections 65, 66 and 136; Provisional Collection of Taxes Act, 1931; Finance Act, 2003 - Sections 157; Customs Tariff Act - Sections 3; Provisional Collection of Taxes Act, 1931; Finance (No. 2) Act, 2004 - Sections 91, 93, 95; Central Excise Rules, 2000 - Rules 3(1), 7, 9 and 16(2); CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004

Reported in : 2009(168)LC87(SC); 2009(240)ELT641(SC); JT2009(11)SC8; 2009(11)SCALE446; (2009)9SCC193; [2009]18STJ323(SC); [2009]22STT54; 2009(7)LC3257(SC)

(ii), (iii), (iv) and (v) above; andvii. the additional duty of excise leviable under Section 157 of the Finance Act, 2003 (32 of 2003), paid on any inputs or capital goods received in the factory on or after the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 02 2012

Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi-i Vs. Joint Secretary(Revisionar ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-02-2012

Subject : Excise

2004); (e) special excise duty collected under a Finance Act; (f) additional duty of excise as levied under section 157 of the Finance Act, 2003 (32 of 2003); (g) Education Cess on excisable goods as levied under clause … under section 136 of the Finance Act, 2001 (14 of 2001), as amended by Section 169 of the Finance Act, 2003 (32 of 2003) and further amended by Section 3 of the Finance Act, 2004 (13 of 2004); (e)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jun 13 2014

Pabhojan Tea Estate Vs. The Union of India, Represented by the Secreta ...

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Jun-13-2014

Subject : Excise

account of delayed payment made by the writ petitioner of (1) additional duty of excise payable under the Finance Act 2003, (2) cess payable under the Tea Act and (3) Education cess payable under the Finance Act on the … duty payable as a surcharge on” Tea and Tea waste” at the rate of “Rs. one per Kg”. Section 157 (1) of the Finance Act provided that there shall be levied and collected for the purpose of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 06 2006

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Ambari Tea Co. Ltd.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Decided on : Apr-06-2006

Subject : Sales Tax

interest is leviable.4. The learned Senior Advocate appearing for the respondent companies submits that Section 157 of the Finance Act, 2003 does not specifically mention for recovery of interest for any delayed payment of additional duty of excise. In

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 26 2014

M/s. Bharti Airtel Ltd. Vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-26-2014

Subject : Service Tax

eligible to take creditof such additional duty(viii)(viii) the additional duty of excise leviable under section 157 of the Finance Act, 2003 (32 of 2003)(ix)(ix) the service tax leviable under section 66 of the Finance Act; …….” 20. In respect

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 19 2005

Eveready India Tea Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Decided on : Jan-19-2005

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2005)(188)ELT419Tri(Kol.)kata

vide clause 149 of the Finance Bill, 2003 which was enacted on 14-5-2003 by Section 157 of the Finance Act, 2003, and not under Sub-section (3) of Section 3 of the Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 19 2005

Namdang Tea Estate Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Decided on : Jan-19-2005

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2005)(186)ELT196Tri(Kol.)kata

vide clause 149 of the Finance Bill, 2003 which was enacted on 14-5-2003 by Section 157 of the Finance Act, 2003, and not under Sub-section (3) of Section 3 of the Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 11 2012

Gmr. Hyd. International Airport Ltd., Vs. Central Board of Excise and ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-11-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 2012(5)ALD177

in India. (2) Every notification issued under this section and in force immediately before the commencement of the Finance Act, 2003 shall, on such commencement, be deemed to have been issued under the provisions of this section as amended … challenged in this writ petition. 2.   Exercising the power available under Subsection 2 of Section 141 read with Section 157 of the Customs Act, 1962, the Central Board of Excise and Customs framed “The Handling of Cargo in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 23 2017

S.C. Jayachandra Vs. Enforcement Directorate, Rep. by Special Public P ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-23-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

has challenged the vires of: (a) Section 2(y)(ii) of PML Act as amended vide Section 145(ii) of the Finance Act, 2015 enhancing the monetary threshold for offences specified under Part - B of the schedule from the total … Engineer working with the State Government. He has held various positions from 2003 till date such as Executive Engineer, Superintendent Engineer, Chief Engineer (Minor Irrigation), … the authority under PMLA, when there is neither any report of commission of any Scheduled offence sent under Section 157 of the Code to the Magistrate nor any complaint for taking cognizance of a Scheduled Offence by an

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial