Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: finance act 2003 section 15 · Page 1 of about 8,878 results (0.128 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 17 2006

All India Tax Payers Welfare Association Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-17-2006

Subject : Service Tax

Acts : Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 65, 66, 68, 68(1), 70, 71A and 83; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 1B, 9C, 9D, 11, 11BB, 11C, 11D, 12, 12A, 12B, 12C, 12D, 12E, 14, 15, 35F, 35D, 35E, 36, 36A, 36B, 37A, 37B, 37C, 37O, and 40; Finance Act, 2003 - Sections 66, 669(1) and 68; Finance Act, 2004 - Sections 83; Central Excises Act, 1944 - Sections 9C, 9D, 11, 11B, 11BB, 11C, 11D, 12, 12A, 12B, 12C, 12D, 12E, 14, 15, 35F to 35O, 35Q, 36, 36A, 36B, 37A, 37B, 37C, 37D and 40; Service Tax Rules, 1997 - Rules 2, 12 and 17

Reported in : (2006)205CTR(Mad)360; 2006[4]STR14

let us look into the relevant provisions of the Act for disposal of this writ petition:Section 68 of Finance Act, 2003 : Every person providing taxable service to any person shall pay Service Tax at the rate specified in … a duty of Excise (9C, 9D, 11, 1B, (11BB), 11C, 11D, 12, 12A, 12B, 12C, 12D, 12E,, 14, 15, 35F, to 35D, 35E, 36, 36A, 36B, 37A, 37B, 37C, 37O, and 40 of the Central Excise Act;

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 18 2004

Dharmpal Satyapal Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : May-18-2004

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 9, 11, 11A and 35F; Finance Act, 2003 - Sections 154 and 154(3); Finance Act, 1982 - Sections 51; Haryana General Sales Tax Act, 1973 - Sections 39 and 39(5); Small Causes Courts Act - Sections 17; Court-fees Act - Sections 6; Customs Act; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 8(1), 9 and 49; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 41, Rule 1; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1) and 226

8.7.1999..The Union of India preferred SLP (c) No. 4131-34/2003 against the judgment in writ appeal.14.5.2003 : By the Finance Act, 2003, the benefit of Notification No. 32/1999 dated 8.7.1999, withdrawn from its inception viz. from 8.7.1999 to 28.2.2001 for … to amend Notification No. 32/1999 from its very inception viz. 8.7.1999. Section 154 of the Finance Act, 2003 retrospectively amended Notification No. 32/1999, withdrawing the … passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Guwahati directing the petitioners to deposit the said amount under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 as pre-condition for hearing the appeal filed by the petitioners against

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 26 2010

Tata Sky Limited Vs. the State of Uttarakhand and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Decided on : Jul-26-2010

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; ; Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 - Section 4; ; Indian Wireless Telegraphy Act, 1933; ; Uttar Pradesh Entertainment and Betting Tax Act, 1979 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 4A, 4A(4), 4B and 4C; ; Bombay Entertainments Duty Act, 1923; ; Uttar Pradesh Entertainment and Betting Tax (Amendment) Act, 2009; ; Finance Act, 2001 - Sections 65, 65(5), 65(13), 65(63), 65(72) and 137; ; Prasar Bharti (Broadcasting Corporation of India) Act, 1990 - Section 2; ; Finance Act, 2002 - Sections 65, 66(5), 65(14), 65(15), 65(80) and 65(90); ; Finance Act, 2003 - Section 65, 65(16), 65(95), 65(105) and 66(1); ; Finance Act, 2004; ; Finance Act, 2005 - Section 65(16) and 65(105); ; Government of India Act, 1935; ; Cable Television Networks (Regulation) Act, 1995; ; Bengal Amusements Tax Act, 1922; ; We

cent of the gross amount charged by the service provider) even under the Finance Act, 2002.19(iii). Under the Finance Act, 2003, the term 'broadcasting' was re-defined through Section 65(15), which is being extracted hereunder:65. Definitions.- In this Chapter, unless

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 21 2005

J.K. Industries Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Apr-21-2005

Subject : Customs

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - Sections 3, 8C, 9 and 9A to 9C; Customs Tariff (Amendment) Act, 1982; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 12, 15, 46, 58, 68, 72 and 129; Indian Tariff Act, 1934; Finance Act, 2003 - Sections 8B, 8C, 8(8) and 15(1); Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI), 2002; Finance Act, 2000 - Sections 9AA; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 34; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 148; Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Anti-dumping Duty on Dumped Articles and for Determination of Injury) Rules, 1995 - Rules 2, 3, 4, 5 to 17, 18, 19 and 20; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 136, 226, 227, 229 and 265

Reported in : 2005(103)ECC152; 2005(186)ELT3(Raj)

before competent authority before goods are cleared from warehouse under Section 68.35. Until Section 15(1)(b) was amended vide Finance Act, 2003, the rate of duty and valuation of tariff was to be done as per the date on which

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 26 2006

Merit Enterprises Vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad

Decided on : Apr-26-2006

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2007)288ITR226(Hyd.)

no question of Parliament overruling the decision of the Supreme Court by passing Finance Act, 2000, and the Finance Act, 2003, to amend the provisions retrospectively. It was held in that context that a Legislature is competent to remove … in Kardicoppal Estate v. State of Karnataka and Anr. 266 ITR 20-Kar., wherein interpreting retrospective amendment made to Section 15 of the Karnataka Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1957, brought about subsequent to the decision of that Court in Ashok

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 06 2007

Virtual Soft Systems Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-i

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-06-2007

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 28(1), 48, 143, 143(1), 143(1A), 260A, 271 and 271(1); Finance Act, 1975; Finance Act, 2002 - Sections 271; Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1975; Finance Act, 1993; Finance Act, 1992; Finance Act, 1951; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 23(5), 28 and 28(1); Constitution of India - Article 20(1)

Reported in : (2007)207CTR(SC)733; [2007]289ITR83(SC); JT2007(3)SC125; 2007(2)SCALE612; (2007)9SCC665

the Punjab and Haryana High Court pertaining to the assessment year 1970-71 was prior to the amendment of Finance Act, 1975 and therefore, was not applicable. For the same reason, the decision of this Court in affirming the … reasoning either on the scope of Section 271(1)(c) and Explanation 4(a) or the nature of 1976 or 2002- 2003 amendments.It has been laid down in CIT v. Podar Cement (supra) , CIT v. P.J. Chemicals : [1994]210ITR830(SC) … Rs.1,47,97,995.01 computed as under:Depreciation for Assessment year Rs. 1,32,44,507.291996-97Unabsorbed depreciation for Rs. 15,53,487.72Assessment Year 1995-96Total = Rs. 1,47,97,995.014. Accordingly, the appellant filed a 'nil' return

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 25 2011

M/S. Bharti Airtel Ltd., Rep by Its Head-legal and Regulatory, S. Naga ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-25-2011

Subject : Service Tax

relevant point of time. 5. BSNL got itself registered under the provisions of the Service Tax under the Finance Act, 1994 and paying service tax regularly. BSNL also got registered under the provisions of Karnataka Sales Tax Act … agreed to be severed before sale or under the contract of sale;” 76. In Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, Section 2(15) defines the term “Goods” as under:- “Goods” means all kinds of movable property (other than newspaper, actionable

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 01 2008

Gurcharan Singh Vs. Directorate of Revenue Intelligence

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-01-2008

Subject : CustomsCriminal

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 2, 2(33), 2(41), 8, 11, 13, 50, 76, 77, 104, 111, 113, 123, 132, 135, 135(1), 135B, 136 and 136(1); Customs (Amendment) Act, 2003; Finance Act, 2003 - Sections 109; Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - Sections 14, 14(1), 15 and 18; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 482; Finance (No. 2) Act, 1991; Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Rules, 1993 - Rule 11

Reported in : 2008(1)ALD(Cri)968; 2008CriLJ2238; 2008(128)ECC5; 2008(154)LC5(SC); 2008(224)ELT497(SC); JT2008(4)SC383; 2008(4)SCALE403; 2008AIRSCW2280; 2008(2)AICLR821; 2008(3)Supreme28

entry of goods which was even otherwise covered. It is in that contingency that Section 109 of the Finance Act, 2003 provided:109. In Section 113 of the Customs Act, -(a) in Clauses (c), (e), (f), (g) and (h), the … this Court not only took into consideration the provisions of the Customs Act, but also the provisions of Section 15 of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act and the rules framed thereunder, as also the notifications issued by the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 27 2009

Saint-gobaIn Glass India Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and or ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-27-2009

Subject : Customs

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; Customs Tariff Tax, 1975 - Sections 8B, 8C, 8C(2) and 8C(6); Finance Act, 2003; Customs Tariff (Transitional Product Specific Safeguard Duty) Rules - Rules 1, 2, 3, 4, 4(5), 5, 5(2), 5(3), 5(4), 6, 6(2), 6(3), 6(4), 6(5), 6(7), 6(8), 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 309 and 311(2)

Reported in : 2009(166)LC71(Delhi); 2009(240)ELT495(Del)

available to the Government of India. A specific provision i.e., Section 8C was introduced in the Act by Finance Act, 2003 w.e.f. 11.05.2002 in respect of specific safeguards duty with regard to imports from China. Under Sub-section (6) of … 5342 5176 5191 2000-01 - 43428 43428 - 5547 5547 2001-02 14840 148778 163617 7655 6987 7048 2002-03 1597 103679 105276 7382 6192 6210 2003-04 151 128214 128365 42268 5801 5844 2004-05 2120 182427 184547 11804 6257

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 08 2007

Fantacy Sales Corporation Vs. Sales Tax Inspector and ors.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Mar-08-2007

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 32, 143, 242, 245, 246, 265 and 301; Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) (Delhi Amendment) Act, 1956 - Sections 8A; Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 - Sections 3(2), 6 and 47(16A); Central Sales Tax Act, 1956; West Bengal Sales Tax Act - 3(1), 3(2), 11(3), 11(4), 11(5), 11(6), 11(7), 11(8), 11(10), 11(11) and 11(12); Income-tax Act, 1922 - Sections 16(3); Assam Taxation (on Goods Carried by Road or on Inland Waterways) Act; Tripura Sales Tax Act, 1976 - Sections 2, 29, 30, 32, 36-A and 38-B; Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1994 - Sections 15; Essential Supplies (Temporary Powers) Act, 1946 - Sections 3; Minimum Wages Act - Sections 27; Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act - Sections 6(2); Bombay Agricultural Produce Markets Act - Sections 29; Madras

Reported in : [2007]8STT33; (2007)7VST323(Ker)

Delhi : [1962]1SCR283 , the validity of Section 8-A of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) (Delhi Amendment) Act, 1956 was assailed in a writ petition … Balakrishnan Nair J.1. The constitutional validity of Sub-section (16A) of Section 47 of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 and the sustainability of two circulars issued by the Commissioner of Commercial Taxes under the said provision are … might be granted, etc., etc.7. In Sardar Inder Singh v. State of Rajasthan : [1957]1SCR605 the validity of Section 15 of the Rajasthan (Protection of Tenants) Ordinance which authorised the Government to exempt any person or class of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial