Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: finance act 2003 section 134 · Page 1 of about 589 results (0.126 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 28 2014

Bihar Chamber of Commerce Vs. Bihar Electricity Regulatory Commission ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

Decided on : May-28-2014

Subject : Education

the Board? F. whether the State Commission has erred by adopting a methodology for calculation of interest and finance charges which are not provided for in the Regulations, 2007? G. whether the State Commission has erred in … The Appeal No. 131 of 2012 has been preferred by the Appellant under Section 111 of the Electricity Act, 2003 against the Order dated 30.3.2012 passed by the Bihar Electricity Regulatory Commission (hereinafter called the State Commission) in … certain legitimate expenditures without any basis and genuine grounds. 4. Appeal No. 134 of 2012 This Appeal has been preferred by the Appellant under Section

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 05 2012

Enercon (India) Ltd. and Others Vs. Enercon Gmbh and Another

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-05-2012

Subject : Arbitration

buttress the said submission by referring to the clauses mentioned in the IPLA, regarding the grant of licences, finance, tenure of the IPLA; iv] That the patents in respect of which the licences were to be given … the judgment of a learned Single Judge of this Court reported in 2003 CLC 601 in the matter of GTC Limited v/s Royal Consulting RV … upon another judgment of the Apex Court reported in (2009) 2 SCC 134 in the matter of ShaktiBhog Foods Limited V/s Kola Shipping Limited and … came to be set aside, resulting in the Application filed under Section 45 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 being allowed in terms of prayer clause 28(a) thereof, and the Injunction Application of the Petitioners above-named,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 05 2026

All Omni Bus Owners Association vs the Transport Commissioner

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-05-2026

2001 Bom 21; (ii)Andhra Pradesh Motor Vehicles Dealers Association and others Vs. Government of India and others, AIR 2003 AP 134; (iii)Tamil Nadu Omni Bus Owners, Assn. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu, 2004 (1) CTC 161; (iv)M/s.Sharma … control and manage the general municipal or local funds for the Chennai area. This is because the municipal finances, including presentation of budgets, approvals, etc, are governed under the Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Act, 1988, and … vehicles contemplated under the Motor Vehicles Act,1988. These classes are found under Sections 2(21), 2(33) and 2(35). She alsourged that the impugned order, by differentiating

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 21 2005

J.K. Industries Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Apr-21-2005

Subject : Customs

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - Sections 3, 8C, 9 and 9A to 9C; Customs Tariff (Amendment) Act, 1982; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 12, 15, 46, 58, 68, 72 and 129; Indian Tariff Act, 1934; Finance Act, 2003 - Sections 8B, 8C, 8(8) and 15(1); Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI), 2002; Finance Act, 2000 - Sections 9AA; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 34; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 148; Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Anti-dumping Duty on Dumped Articles and for Determination of Injury) Rules, 1995 - Rules 2, 3, 4, 5 to 17, 18, 19 and 20; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 136, 226, 227, 229 and 265

Reported in : 2005(103)ECC152; 2005(186)ELT3(Raj)

before competent authority before goods are cleared from warehouse under Section 68.35. Until Section 15(1)(b) was amended vide Finance Act, 2003, the rate of duty and valuation of tariff was to be done as per the date on which

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 23 2008

Sony India (P) Limited Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Decided on : Sep-23-2008

Subject : Direct Taxation

learned CIT(A), however, noted that the provisions of Section 234D have been introduced in the statute by the Finance Act, 2003 w.e.f.1.6.2003. According to him, the said provisions thus were applicable only in relation to AY 2003-04 onwards and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 27 2010

Hm Treasury Vs. Ahmed and Others

Court : UK Supreme Court

Decided on : Jan-27-2010

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Security Council had decided that all States shall, among various other measures “ "(d) Prevent those who finance, plan, facilitate or commit terrorist acts from using their respective territories for those purposes against other States or … all lawful means, the financing and preparation of any acts of terrorism." 134. The first specific measure called for by the Resolution in paragraph 1(b) … had reasonable grounds for suspecting that he was, or might be, a person who facilitated the commission of acts of terrorism. He was also told that, in light of the sensitive nature of the information on which … power to make Orders in Council which was conferred on them by section 1 of the United Nations Act 1946 ("the 1946 Act"). In each

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 30 2022

The Assistant Commissioner of State Tax vs M/S Manappuram Finance Ltd.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Nov-30-2022

the Court is concerned with the amendments made to Section 42(3) of the VAT Act by the Kerala Finance Act 2016 (for short ‘Act 18/2016’).2. We have heard Mr Mohammed Rafiq learned SpecialGovernment Pleader (Taxes), and Mr Shamsudheen, … and work. Sections 20 to 39 of Chapter V and Section 6 of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (for short ‘the VAT Act’) provide for different obligations -107- on the Dealer and the Officers in filing

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 30 2022

The State of Kerala, vs Pushpangadhan P.,

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Nov-30-2022

the Court is concerned with the amendments made to Section 42(3) of the VAT Act by the Kerala Finance Act 2016 (for short ‘Act 18/2016’).2. We have heard Mr Mohammed Rafiq learned SpecialGovernment Pleader (Taxes), and Mr Shamsudheen, … and work. Sections 20 to 39 of Chapter V and Section 6 of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (for short ‘the VAT Act’) provide for different obligations -107- on the Dealer and the Officers in filing

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 30 2022

The State of Kerala vs Tulsi Developers India (P) Ltd.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Nov-30-2022

the Court is concerned with the amendments made to Section 42(3) of the VAT Act by the Kerala Finance Act 2016 (for short ‘Act 18/2016’).2. We have heard Mr Mohammed Rafiq learned SpecialGovernment Pleader (Taxes), and Mr Shamsudheen, … and work. Sections 20 to 39 of Chapter V and Section 6 of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (for short ‘the VAT Act’) provide for different obligations -107- on the Dealer and the Officers in filing

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 30 2022

State of Kerala vs Mcp Enterprises

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Nov-30-2022

the Court is concerned with the amendments made to Section 42(3) of the VAT Act by the Kerala Finance Act 2016 (for short ‘Act 18/2016’).2. We have heard Mr Mohammed Rafiq learned SpecialGovernment Pleader (Taxes), and Mr Shamsudheen, … and work. Sections 20 to 39 of Chapter V and Section 6 of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (for short ‘the VAT Act’) provide for different obligations -107- on the Dealer and the Officers in filing

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial