Advanced Search Results

Gujarat Ambuja Cements Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ConstitutionService Tax

Acts : Finance Act, 2000 - Sections 116 and 117; Finance Act, 2003 - Sections 158; Service Tax Rules, 1994 - Rules 2(1); Service Tax (Amendment) Rules, 1997; Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 64(3), 65, 65(5), 65(28), 65(41), 66, 66(3), 67, 68, 68(1), 69, 69(2), 69(5), 70, 70(1), 71, 71A, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 and 94; Finance Act, 1997 - Sections 68(1A) and 84; Finance Act, 1998; Service Tax (Amendment) Rules, 1998; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 2; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 246(1); Punjab Passengers and Goods Taxation Act, 1952 - Sections 3(3); Service Tax Act, 1994

Reported in : AIR2005SC3020; (2005)4CompLJ440(SC); (2005)194CTR(SC)428; 2005(99)ECC377; 2005(182)ELT33(SC); [2005]274ITR194(SC); JT2005(Suppl3)SC389; (2005)4SCC214; 2006[3]STR608; 200

the constitutional validity of Sections 116 and 117 of the Finance Act 2000 and Section 158 of the Finance Act, 2003 by which the decision of this Court in Laghu Udyog Bharati and Anr. v. Union of India and

Salem Textiles Limited 'B' unit rep. by Its General Manager (Tech), Mr ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Tamil Nadu Tax on Consumption or Sale of Electricity (Amendment) Act, 2007 - Sections 2(7); Tamil Nadu Tax on Consumption or Sale of Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 2(2A), 2(7), 2(8), 3, 3(1), 6, 20 and 20(1); Finance Act, 2003 - Sections 158; Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 65(5), 66(3) and 68; Finance Act, 2000 - Sections 116 and 117; Service Tax Rules, 1994 - Rule 2(1)

Reported in : (2008)1MLJ844

of law, this cannot be and is not disputed. The question is whether by enacting Sections 116 and 117 of the Finance Act, 2000 and Section 158 of the Finance Act, 2003, the bases on which this … an Amendment Act. While dealing with the said Amendment Act, it was held that the object of the Finance Act, 2003, which has in effect amended Section 65(5), 66(3) and 68 of Finance Act, 1994 was to nullify the

Nava Bharat Ferro Alloys Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Service Tax

Acts : Finance Act, 2000 - Sections 65(7), 65(18A), 65(18B), 65(48), 116 and 117; Finance Act, 1997; Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 65, 66 68, 70, 71A and 94; Finance Act, 2003 - Sections 68, 68(1), 69, 70, 71 and 71A; Assam Taxation (On Goods Carried by Road or on Inland Waterways) Act; Central Tea Act - Sections 3(1) and 3(2); Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 43, 43(1), 43(1A) and 44; Rajasthan Passengers and Goods Taxation Act, 1959 - Sections 3 and 4; Karnataka Entertainments Tax Act, 1958 - Sections 2; Expenditure Tax Act, 1987; British North America Act, 1867 - Sections 91 and 92; Finance Act, 1998 - Sections 65, 65(16), 65(17), 65(41) and 66(3); Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 2; Finance Act, 1997 - Sections 84; Service Tax Rules, 1994 - Rule 2 and 2(1); Service Tax (Amendm

Reported in : (2005)186CTR(AP)451; 2005(185)ELT236(AP); 2006[3]STR565

of tax, but extended the time to file returns till 28.11.2003. Further amendments however, were carried out in Finance Act, 2003 in order to validate the imposition of tax from 16.7.1997 to 2.6.1998 and to remove the basic infirmities … to this argument, it is necessary to reproduce the amendments that were affected to the Finance Act in 2003. Section 68 in 2003 Act reads as under:Section 68 : Payment of service tax.-Provided that-(i) in relation to services … assessment of the service tax and the provisions of Section 71 shall apply accordingly.In Finance Act of 2000, Section 117 lays down:117. Validation of certain action taken under Service Tax Rules. - Notwithstanding anything contained in any judgment,

R. Piyarelall Import and Export Ltd., a Company Incorporated Under the ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Destructive Insects and Pests (Amendment and Validation) Act, 1992 - Sections 4 and 11; Companies Act, 1956; Destructive Insects and Pests Act, 1914 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 3(3); Inter-State Water Disputes Act; Karnataka State Civil Services (Regulation of Promotion, Pay and Pension) Act, 1973 - Sections 11(2); Cess and Other Taxes on Minerals (Validation) Act, 1992; M.M.R.D. Act - Sections 2 and 2(1); Finance Act, 2000 - Sections 116 and 117; Finance Act, 2003 - Sections 158; Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 65, 65(5), 66, 66(3), 68(1), 68(1A) and 71; Finance (Amendment) Act, 1997; Service Tax Rules, 1994 - Rule 2(1); Plants, Fruits and Seeds (Regulation of Import into India) Order, 1989; Karnataka Cauvery Basin Irrigation Protection Ordinance, 1991

Reported in : 2006(4)BomCR637; [2006(3)JCR181]; 2006(6)MhLj123

is whether by enacting Sections 116 and 117 of the Finance Act, 2000 and Section 158 of the Finance Act, 2003, the bases on which this Court struck down Rule 2(1)(d), (xii) and (xvii) of the Service Tax Rules,

Greenply Industries Ltd. Vs. Cce

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2006)(111)ECC151

recourse to retrospective amendments.7. Having noticed the loophole in the provisions, a further amendment was brought by the Finance Act, 2003. Section 158 of the Finance Act, 2003 retrospectively amended the Section 68 and sought to insert a new Section … initiated for the recovery of interest from the appellants, the department's contention that he case is covered under Section 117 of Finance Act, 2000, miserably fails. If no attempt was made during the relevant period to raise any

Mount Shivalik Industries Ltd. Vs. Cce and C

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

recourse to retrospective amendments.6. Having noticed the loophole in the provisions, a further amendment was brought by the Finance Act, 2003. Section 158 of the Finance Act, 2003 retrospectively amended the Section 68 and sought to insert a new Section … initiated for the recovery of interest from the appellants, the department's contention that he case is covered under Section 117 of Finance Act, 2000, miserably fails. If no attempt was made during the relevant period to raise any

Cheyyar Co-op. Sugar Mills Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2008)14STJ54CESTAT(Chennai)

valid and always to have been valid for all purposes, as validly and effectively taken or done" vide Section 117 of the Finance Act, 2000. Later on, the Finance Act, 2003 made certain amendments to the service tax … period were filed and the tax paid within the period of time prescribed for the purpose under the Finance Act, 2003. Such payment of tax was made under protest. Later on, it appears, the party filed a refund claim,

Cce Vs. Super Sales Agencies Ltd.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2005)(119)LC192Tri(Chennai)

as validly and effectively taken or done" vide Section 117 of the Finance Act, 2000. Later on, the Finance Act, 2003, make certain amendments to the Service Tax provisions of the Finance Act, 1994, whereby the aforesaid assessees were

Commissioner of C. Ex. Vs. Bhuwalka Steel Industries Ltd.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2005)(185)ELT153Tri(Chennai)

as validly and effectively taken or done" vide Section 117 of the Finance Act, 2000. Later on, the Finance Act, 2003, made certain amendments to the Service tax provisions of the Finance Act, 1994, whereby the aforesaid assessees were

M/S South Eastern Coalfields Ltd Vs. Cce, Raipur

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

to the notice was issued on 02-11-2004 pointing out the retrospective amendment made in Finance Act, 1994 by Finance Act 2003 and the prospective amendment in section 73 of Finance Act 1994 made by Finance Act 2004. Finally the … by the Apex Court in the case of Laghu Bharati Udyog (Supra), The Parliament made retrospective amendment by section 117 of the Finance Act, 2000. This amendment validated the action taken under the said rule not withstanding any